SnarkyMonkey
Well-Known Member
I guess I must be in the minority but I think the transformation of Maelstrom into a Frozsn attraction. Norway seems like an appropriate place for a tie in from a movie that takes place in Norway.
I guess I must be in the minority but I think the transformation of Maelstrom into a Frozsn attraction. Norway seems like an appropriate place for a tie in from a movie that takes place in Norway.
Yup. Looks like Disney found a way to help with traffic a little. A real expansion in a better spot could've handled traffic too, but that Viking Longship sailed a LONG time agoThe size of the building is larger than Fairytale Hall. Just guessing here but I wonder if an Olaf Meet and Greet would be part of this, or additional princesses beyond Anna and Elsa. With the restrooms being a woman's restroom @Tom also speculated that it probably means the men's room in the existing Norway pavilion building will expand into the woman's room. Considering the expectation of increased traffic this makes some sense.
Put a walk through with Kangaroos and Koalas near the Nemo theater, call that small area Australia and the theming issue there is fixed.
Wait. What is coming to Epcot? Besides the ride makeover? Fill me in.FYI, @WDW1974 back in November 2013: http://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/the-spirit-takes-the-fifth.876705/page-12#post-5802761
I wouldn't be surprised if it's more than just Anna and Elsa meeting guests here. Also, do any of our insiders know if the $75 million that was originally thrown out there is still accurate for the entire project? If so, the prospects for the ride just decreased significantly.
Nope, keep those restrooms! They were there before Norway!OMG we are getting a restroom update. Its about time the 1980's was evicted and the restrooms were expanded. This is probably the best news out of the entire project.
So. Just watched WFTV do a news story on Frozen coming to Epcot and they suggested the NEW building would house the ride and the Maelstrom building will house the meet and greet.
Can we get some insider confirmation on this? I know they can sometimes get their wires crossed when telling a Disney news story on a new attraction/etc.
Just thought I'd share what they said.
they got their wires crossed lol
Speaking of fictional empires, you just made me wish Atlantis did better way back when. We could have had it all: Fire Mountain in Magic Kingdom, Atlantis Subs at Disneyland, a really cool in-house Sci-Fi IP, a TV show with a crossover with Gargoyles and more Mignola designed monsters, turbonerds speaking Atlantean at conventions...So when are we getting Mos Eisley Cantina over in Morocco?
Oh?
We're not?
What do you mean a fictional Empire does not belong in EPCOT?
Since when are we playing by actual rules anymore?
Thanks for clarifying, that is very good to hear!well the building is marked as modular... means the interiors can be struck and replaced really easily, essentially a warehouse or soundstage. so it can be changed and rearranged as the needs of the park changes.
I think once Frozen-mania is over, we'll look back and not really be bothered by Frozen at Norway. It took a quarter century for the little mermaid to make its way into Magic Kingdom. I think i'd be equally offended if Frozen joined the elite ranks of making it into fantasyland a year after it's debut. As for Norway, The church is still there, the bakery is still there. To me, that alone would be sufficient for a Norway pavilion. If we compare it to Maelstrom, it's a travesty because Maelstrom felt authentic and it had the greatest voiceover in the history of ride voiceovers. If we step back and say "Of all the countries with a pavilion, which country makes the least sense" and then add on top of that "Of all the pavilions with rides, which country makes the least sense", I stop feeling so bad that they crammed Frozen into Maelstrom's spot. If Frozen is really all it's cracked up to be, in 25 years it can move into a shiny new home in fantasyland and they'll find something else to put into Norway.
It's all blown out of proportion because they removed maelstrom to do it. If Maelstrom had never existed and they built a home for Frozen in Norway's pavilion, I think this thread is only a quarter as long.
But before everyone throws stones and says I don't understand world showcase, etc etc, I was probably in line with some of you on Maelstrom's last weekend. I don't agree with the commercialization of the parks any more than you do. But if you were going to stick a Frozen ride somewhere, it hasn't earned fantasyland, i've got way bigger plans for DHS than frozen, and AKL doesn't make any sense. Stick it in norway and let it die.
It has become obvious that the parks are about showcasing different Disney IPs in different environments. Go back a couple decades and fantasy and fiction was found at Magic Kingdom, science and discovery were at Epcot Center. You didn't see loads of Disney themed stuff in Epcot Center. Now Epcot is just another Disney theme park to place IPs.So, let me get this straight. Maelstrom is being gutted for a cartoon ride. And, they are going to use the pad between Norway and Mexico to build some sort of Arendelle themed building for a new restroom and a large meet and greet?
Has the entire concept of World Showcase and EPCOT just gone out the window here? This belongs in the Magic Kingdom. It would be GREAT for the Magic Kingdom.
Then again, Nemo and his lame ride belonged in DAK, not The Living Seas.
It has become obvious that the parks are about showcasing different Disney IPs in different environments. Go back a couple decades and fantasy and fiction was found at Magic Kingdom, science and discovery were at Epcot Center. You didn't see loads of Disney themed stuff in Epcot Center. Now Epcot is just another Disney theme park to place IPs.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.