LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
Friends.I'm old and quite possibly out of touch, but, other than Gentlemen instead of Gentleman, what other options are there.
Friends.I'm old and quite possibly out of touch, but, other than Gentlemen instead of Gentleman, what other options are there.
Once again... Friends as a salutation to a group is absolutely acceptable, but it cannot be used individually unless one actually is a friend. It's just plain proper grammar. Maybe if they taught English grammar in school now this would be recognized as an incorrect way to greet an individual one does not know.Friends.
Of course it can. Multiple people have done in here in this thread.it cannot be used individually unless one actually is a friend.
What you’re talking about actually has nothing to do with grammar, but leaving that aside, “gentleman” likewise falls short of the standards you’ve laid out: one can’t idiomatically address an individual as “gentleman”, and the traditional definition of the term (which for hundred of years was restricted to men born into nobility and the gentry) doesn’t apply to the vast majority of people today. “Sir” does work as an individual form of address, but it too is an overextension of the term’s original meaning, which applied only to men of a certain rank.Once again... Friends as a salutation to a group is absolutely acceptable, but it cannot be used individually unless one actually is a friend. It's just plain proper grammar. It has nothing to do with "woke" or whatever other pimple on life that one can conceive. Maybe if they taught English grammar in school now this would be recognized as an incorrect way to greet an individual one does not know.
I am not playing games. Some people do not identify as either a lady or a gentleman. Regardless of how you feel about this, Disney has made it clear that they are trying to be as inclusive as possible. Using "friend" avoids introducing gender into the interaction between CM and guest.No it covers everyone & even if i played into your little game which i will
Not it still covers probably over 99% of people walking thru those gates… but again it covers everyone.
I read usage books for fun (sad, I know). Self-appointed language authorities make all sorts of silly pronouncements that bear no relation to actual usage (“Don’t split infinitives”, “Never put prepositions at the end of sentences”, etc.), but I’ve never come across any sort of claimed rule against the use of “friend” for people who aren’t actually our friends. On the contrary, such use of the term is a traditional feature of our language, attested by examples going back hundreds of years.And "rules" made by experts don't matter when it comes to cultural usage.
Congrats, you answered your own question.What is the relevance of posting this paper?
If/when CMs address a guest as “friend,” that doesn’t mean they’re trying to get you to be their friend.
WDW already uses "guy" and "guys."What you’re talking about actually has nothing to do with grammar, but leaving that aside, “gentleman” likewise falls short of the standards you’ve laid out: one can’t idiomatically address an individual as “gentleman”, and the traditional definition of the term (which for hundred of years was restricted to men born into nobility and the gentry) doesn’t apply to the vast majority of people today. “Sir” does work as an individual form of address, but it too is an overextension of the term’s original meaning, which applied only to men of a certain rank.
All of which is to say that “gentlemen”, “sir”, and “friend(s)” are all being used nonliterally when employed as forms of address for strangers.
I doubt very much they use “guy” to address individuals—“Hello, guy, please move behind the line” sounds totally unidiomatic.WDW already uses "guy" and "guys."
So people are not allowed to have a different opinion? That's what this thread boils down to, and as has been pointed out, that crosses into an unhealthy discourse.Exactly. People are making up the “offended” part. Disney is simply doing what many companies have done for decades: evolving with the times.
Do you not read these posts. When talking about group salutations is when Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls is acceptable in a theme park environment and should not have been changed. It never was inappropriate and still isn't when used in that situation. I never said they could be used when addressing individuals. If we go back to the beginning of this discussion I said and I stand by the idea of saying something like Hey, Friend or stand in line friend or excuse me friend stand behind the rope is not the proper way to address individuals unless the word Friend is proceeded by the possessive word "my" friend or "your" friend or "their" friend, otherwise it is being used incorrectly. You seem to want to intermingle the singular and group salutations. They cannot both be used properly in alternate situations. That is less being "sensitive" and more culturally "dumbing down". No I didn't just call you dumb. In this sense it is the errosion of a universal language that means the same thing to everybody. People cannot just create their own language on a whim without making sure that everyone is on the same page. Before to long our language would become something that even we don't understand. At what point does it become acceptable to say things like "I ain't gonna got no more nothin for ya". You understand what is said but it doesn't fit in with universally accepted grammar. That is why I don't like it. Like I said it's like fingernails on a chalk board to me. Doesn't my sensitivity require consideration as much as others?What you’re talking about actually has nothing to do with grammar, but leaving that aside, “gentleman” likewise falls short of the standards you’ve laid out: one can’t idiomatically address an individual as “gentleman”, and the traditional definition of the term (which for hundred of years was restricted to men born into nobility and the gentry) doesn’t apply to the vast majority of people today. “Sir” does work as an individual form of address, but it too is an overextension of the term’s original meaning, which applied only to men of a certain rank.
All of which is to say that “gentlemen”, “sir”, and “friend(s)” are all being used nonliterally when employed as forms of address for strangers.
Where in my post did I insinuate this?So people are not allowed to have a different opinion?
Dear reader,I read usage books for fun (sad, I know). Self-appointed language authorities make all sorts of silly pronouncements that bear no relation to actual usage (“Don’t split infinitives”, “Never put prepositions at the end of sentences”, etc.), but I’ve never come across any sort of claimed rule against the use of “friend” for people who aren’t actually our friends. On the contrary, such use of the term is a traditional feature of our language, attested by examples going back hundreds of years.
I’m not really sure how to respond to all this except to say that I do indeed read these posts very carefully and that I do not agree that there is such a thing as “a universal language that means the same thing to everybody”. If there were, there would be nothing to discuss in this thread.Do you not read these posts. When talking about group salutations is when Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls is acceptable in a theme park environment and should not have been changed. It never was inappropriate and still isn't when used in that situation. I never said they could be used when addressing individuals. If we go back to the beginning of this discussion I said and I stand by the idea of saying something like Hey, Friend or stand in line friend or excuse me friend stand behind the rope is not the proper way to address individuals unless the word Friend is proceeded by the possessive word "my" friend or "your" friend or "their" friend, otherwise it is being used incorrectly. You seem to want to intermingle the singular and group salutations. They cannot both be used properly in alternate situations. That is less being "sensitive" and more culturally "dumbing down". No I didn't just call you dumb. In this sense it is the errosion of a universal language that means the same thing to everybody. People cannot just create their own language on a whim without making sure that everyone is on the same page. Before to long our language would become something that even we don't understand. At what point does it become acceptable to say things like "I ain't gonna got no more nothin for ya". You understand what is said but it doesn't fit in with universally accepted grammar. That is why I don't like it. Like I said it's like fingernails on a chalk board to me. Doesn't my sensitivity require consideration as much as others?
Um.....Monsters INC.I doubt very much they use “guy” to address individuals—“Hello, guy, please move behind the line” sounds totally unidiomatic.
“Guys” used for groups sounds fine to me, though some may not like it. It too is meant nonliterally (it originally referred to effigies of Guy Fawkes).
How does any of this relate to what I wrote?Dear reader,
The question is not if anyone has used it this way. They have. They have often done so as a form of manipulation. The question discussed how comfortable we feel with the word being used this way. This thread has established that some people are, and some are not. English is used by a great many people around the world. There is variation in how words are used in different locations and over time.
The opening post of this thread was, "Has anyone else that has visited the parks recently noticed CMs referring to you/your party as "friends"? "
That isn’t a form or vocative address. You can refer to someone as “that guy”, but you can’t idiomatically address someone in the singular second person as “guy” (unless their name is actually “Guy”). If you’re really going to debate me on that point, you’re just arguing for the sake of it.Um.....Monsters INC.
"That guy" is in every show.
Ultimately, it isn't up to you or me what WDW employees say.“Friend(s)” has done the trick nicely for about a millennium now.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.