Disney CMs calling guests " Friends"?

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I know I am unique. As I see the world, I see males that have traits which are more common in females and there are females that have traits more commonly found in males, I just do not associate these as gender specific just because it works for most. -- but it seems, to better fit in with the times, I should see traits as boxed into gender specificities because the box fits the majority? (which omits a good number of folks as they do not fit the box 100% ) believe that is the path my mind takes in seeing things as traits and not as pronouns.
I’m not suggesting that men can’t have traits normatively associated with women (and vice versa). Indeed, I myself am such a man. But that doesn’t mean that I would take kindly to being called “princess” except in very specific circumstances by very specific people. As a general rule, one shouldn’t misgender people, particularly if that act of misgendering, no matter how well intentioned, is likely to come across as a homophobic slur.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
I have to admit that it makes me chuckle that you are having to explain that calling a man "princess" is not likely to be interpreted as a compliment!
Not to mention it's problematic that it's considered an insult for a man be called by feminine names as if there was something inherently inferior to being female or having a stereotypical female trait.

"I'm not a woman! ... Not that there's anything wrong with that."
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
Good morning ladies and gentleman boys and girls!
Tell me why saying ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls do not align with whatever anyone defines themselves as other then Eunuch? The only other way to describe the human race that is universal is carbon-based life form. Which doesn't exactly roll of the carbon based tongue, does it? But again that is for a wide range, larger gathering of mixed identities, not individuals. That is also when Friends would be appropriate, not for individual stranger identity.
 

Mr Ferret 75

Thank you sir. You were an inspiration.
Premium Member
Tell me why saying ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls do not align with whatever anyone defines themselves as other then Eunuch? The only other way to describe the human race that is universal is carbon-based life form. Which doesn't exactly roll of the carbon based tongue, does it? But again that is for a wide range, larger gathering of mixed identities, not individuals. That is also when Friends would be appropriate, not for individual stranger identity.
Well said friend.
 

mkt

When a paradise is lost go straight to Disney™
Premium Member
Until the presence of aliens from another world has been established "Good morning humans" couldn't possible offend any one
You rang?

animation domination fox GIF by gifnews
 

crazy4disney

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Tell me why saying ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls do not align with whatever anyone defines themselves as other then Eunuch? The only other way to describe the human race that is universal is carbon-based life form. Which doesn't exactly roll of the carbon based tongue, does it? But again that is for a wide range, larger gathering of mixed identities, not individuals. That is also when Friends would be appropriate, not for individual stranger identity.
so are you saying that the removal of this phrase was way over the top like i feel & believe or are suggesting something else?
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
so are you saying that the removal of this phrase was way over the top like i feel & believe or are suggesting something else?
Yes, that is what I'm saying. The phrase Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls covers every possibility other then such a small number that it really isn't worth the effort. If, for example a man (transitions) and identifies as a woman then whatever one he/she identifies with is covered, non-judgmentally. So yes, they did go unnecessarily overboard if they have changed that. But, saying "Friends" in that group announcement isn't offensive or incorrect either. But keeping with the title of this thread, it does not fit individually. And it's not necessary to even try to get the attention or address any individual with friend unless the really are friends.
 
Last edited:

crazy4disney

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Yes, that is what I'm saying. The phrase Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls covers every possibility other then such a small number that it really isn't worth the effort. If, for example a man (transitions) and identifies as a woman then whatever one he/she identifies with is covered, non-judgmentally. So yes, they did go unnecessarily overboard if they have changed that. But, saying "Friends" in that group announcement isn't offensive or incorrect either. But keeping with the title of this thread, it does not fit individually. And it not necessary to even try to get the attention or address any individual with friend unless the really are friends.
So i found another in agreement 👍👍. We should start a club lol
 

MickeyLuv'r

Well-Known Member
Other varieties of English (including British) also use "princess" in that way. It's still gendered, because it's based on the idea of a supposedly female brand of entitlement. But I don't see what any of this has to do with the topic at hand. We're talking about how one should address strangers in a courteous manner. Surely we can agree that "friend" is a safer way to address a man you don't know than "princess".
Huh? I did not start the sidebar on the word princess.

person you do not know =stranger
In some places friend ONLY =someone you know have known your entire life.
stranger and friend are antonyms.
Calling a stranger a friend is double-speak, an inversion of language. Double-speak is a form of lying. It is done to manipulate emotions, and it is dangerous, because it makes lies sound truthful.

Surely, we all agree that doublespeak is dangerous, and that we should call it out when we see it.
 

MickeyLuv'r

Well-Known Member
I have to admit that it makes me chuckle that you are having to explain that calling a man "princess" is not likely to be interpreted as a compliment!
I'm sorry, but who claimed that?
All I can find is someone saying they did not mind their daughter being addressed as princess while visiting WDW. -post #395
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom