Hopefully whatever this is for, is something BIG. The wizard down the road is apparently ready to throw money at the parks to beat the mouse. The mouse seems to be content
Hopefully whatever this is for, is something BIG. The wizard down the road is apparently ready to throw money at the parks to beat the mouse. The mouse seems to be content
Nintendo if done correctly, offers dozens of obvious choices for full immersion to the same degree as Hogwarts or Pandora. There are many fully fleshed out worlds for them to choose from to create and adapt the characters into. Whether its Hyrule or the Mushroom Kingdom or one of the many others, they could very easily produce something that is visually unique and with rides that bring the games to life. I'd say that Nintendo brings them more options than Harry Potter does, because with that they were pretty much locked into starting with Hogwarts or Diagon Alley, and then not much else that's unique to the property.I don't see how a Nintendo land can compare to either Harry Potter or Star Wars. Nintendo produced some great games and will be popular but they are different games and putting them in the same land will be fun but in no way can it have a common theme. I loved the original games on the original NES but never got into any of the other systems. 8 bit systems required game play and programming over video and IMO were better than what is out there now. I know it's only my opinion but Harry Potter provided the perfect environment for a themepark while Nintendo lacks it.
I don't see how a Nintendo land can compare to either Harry Potter or Star Wars. Nintendo produced some great games and will be popular but they are different games and putting them in the same land will be fun but in no way can it have a common theme. I loved the original games on the original NES but never got into any of the other systems. 8 bit systems required game play and programming over video and IMO were better than what is out there now. I know it's only my opinion but Harry Potter provided the perfect environment for a themepark while Nintendo lacks it.
This, like the 3,000 acre purchase a few years ago, has nothing to do with development of a 5th gate. They do this because it lowers their taxes. They pass it off as being in the name of conservation, which is more of a side effect.
I’m not desperate for any fifth gate as there’s plenty of room for expansion of the existing parks. There’s even more room within existing parks for expansion than even a fifth gate would bring.Yes, there is very little chance of a 5th gate any time soon for a variety of reasons.
There’s a lot of added expense and labor involved in a fifth park that doesn’t exist with expansion of the existing parks.I’m not desperate for any fifth gate as there’s plenty of room for expansion of the existing parks. There’s even more room within existing parks for expansion than even a fifth gate would bring.
But, I don’t understand how a fifth gate is very different from an equally large expansion of existing parks. What makes one plausible and the other prohibitive?
Disney's Captain America Park. Coming soon in a celebration near you.I wish they would build the old Disney’s America park... but its not IP so that will never happen
You are underestimating the popularity of nintendo. Several announcements from them got number 1 in the past.I don't see how a Nintendo land can compare to either Harry Potter or Star Wars. Nintendo produced some great games and will be popular but they are different games and putting them in the same land will be fun but in no way can it have a common theme. I loved the original games on the original NES but never got into any of the other systems. 8 bit systems required game play and programming over video and IMO were better than what is out there now. I know it's only my opinion but Harry Potter provided the perfect environment for a themepark while Nintendo lacks it.
This is probably a question for @danlb_2000 .
Does the value of the land set aside for conservation have an effect on how much they’re allowed to develop, or is it just how much land is set aside?
I ask because Mira Lago was $11.5 million for 3,000 acres versus this purchase which was $23 million for 965 acres.
No, nothing to do with the value of the land.This is probably a question for @danlb_2000 .
Does the value of the land set aside for conservation have an effect on how much they’re allowed to develop, or is it just how much land is set aside?
I ask because Mira Lago was $11.5 million for 3,000 acres versus this purchase which was $23 million for 965 acres.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.