Disney Buying LucasFilm! WHOA

I wouldn't say the prequels were entirely disappointing. IMHO, Revenge of the Sith is the third best SW film behind E5 and E4. Creating new films sans Lucas presents an unprecedented opportunity for Disney to reboot a truly legendary and groundbreaking film franchise. Disney is not going to risk those kind of stakes on material from the EU. While some of the EU is interesting, I think much of it is appealing only to the truly rabid fanboys and won't play well to a mass audience. Disney will hire an up and coming hot Hollywood screenwriter or someone with a good track record and base it all on the existing films with new tidbits from George. The Director they choose will have a successful track record. They don't want to blow this because the money-making potential is unprecedented.

I hope you are right about that. There is a crowd of talent right now, I can think of 3 or 4 just off hand. So let me ask this, if it is a continuation , who is the big bad?? Do you go force user, or do you go like Zahn did and pick an Imperial mastermind? Or do you not even involve the main characters of the first and tell a side story , like an Emperor's Hand , something of that nature?? I am a fanboy and can think of many possibilities lol.
 

JustInTime

Well-Known Member
As it should, she's not the put a logo on everything type of person Lucas is. Potter is staying pure, and true to her vision... I admire that. Lucas built this giant Star Wars machine, not everything is of high quality, we all know that - but it's huge. The fan base is there, drooling for something to get behind and re-energize it.
Oh, I totally agree. But in the same hand, I think the Wizarding World will be very similar. I think it's right up there, at least equal to Star Wars. Just above LOTR. Get ready though, Rowling is not done with that world. She would not have made that comment if she wasn't on to something. Count on her to inject excitement to the series years to come. She is so protective that she won't let it fade. I would also not be shocked at all if she allowed another author to do something in her universe in the coming years. And if she does that, you know it will be the right time and the right material.

Now, none of this is to discredit Star Wars. I happen to agree with you that the HP movies are far below par with the HP books. But ultimately I just think that the two should be able to coexist. Harry Potter is the closest thing we have ever seen to come close to what Star Wars has. And some areas, it has exceeded. I think that is so impressive. And at the end of the day, I love both.
 

FigmentJedi

Well-Known Member
Universal likely couldn't care less. It has Harry Potter. How could it feel the least bit threatened by a franchise that faded a long time ago?

Frankly, I'm surprised ANYONE'S still a fan of Star Wars after those crappy sequels/prequels and that dopey Clone Wars cartoon...
Clone Wars is actually really good. Had a shaky first season and the premiere movie was lame, but it's gotten so much better since. Feels more like the Original Trilogy then the prequels ever did.
 

mgf

Well-Known Member
When did The Walt Disney Company announce its intention to acquire Marvel Entertainment?
When did The Walt Disney Company officially acquire Marvel Entertainment?
When did The Walt Disney Company announce a new theme park experienced based on a Marvel property?

Despite what Lasseter said back when Pixar Was purchased, there has been no evidence to show any interest on Disney's part to move quickly in regards to theme park developments. Given Iger's love of caution I really have a hard time seeing a new attraction until after Episode VII has made an acceptable amount of money.

Given the aggressive passion of SW fans (see "The People vs GL), it might be good for Disney to signal a level of seriousness by moving on the theme park experience before the movie. SW fans are already vocalizing their concern that Disney will wreck the franchise. A well executed, well funded expansion would both calm nerves and drum excitement.

The difference here is that SW is a proven moneymaker. With the SW Weekend synergy, for example, Disney already knows it can exploit the theme park platform for financial gain from this particularly fan-base. There is no real guessing here. People will come for a well done environment.

Iger said on the call that the purchase was done almost exclusively for the films and merchandise. The park can and should be the loss leader to drive the fan-base to trust Disney with the films AND to drive significant merchandise sales - assuming unique/exclusive offerings.
 

JustInTime

Well-Known Member
I agree with you on the longevity of the Potter franchise, but The Casual Vacancy is horrible. The critics definitely got it right on that one. It only sold because everyone was hoping to recapture some Potter magic.
I didn't hate it but I also didn't love it. The story was there and it was good, I just didn't give a crap about all the characters. I literally only liked 2 characters. But it is sad. Start to finish. Nothing good happens. Not once.
 

JenniferS

When you're the leader, you don't have to follow.
All caught up now.
Have to admit it, I only understood half of what I read. As a 45 year old woman, I am only familiar with original three SW movies, but I have to say I AM EXCITED.
I think this is huge news. Hoping Disney is willing to keep the wallet open and keep spending to bring some of this IP to the parks.
 

disney fan 13

Well-Known Member
There is only one definite about this new movie...







These two will be in it...









57260.jpg
 

theRIOT

Active Member
I've heard that Disney is taking its old ideas for Westcot and retheme them all to Star Wars. The gold version of SSE will look quite fetching in Death Star black and shooting a green lazer from the top!

Ok, that's all a lie. But I fanboi can dream.
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Way back when Disney purchased the rights to those old characters, there were NO properties available with multiple film and TV show treatments. The only source material available for acquisition was from books.

I enjoyed the recent Muppets movie. Star Tours 2.0, too. Pixar movies and attractions continue to show artistry, as well.

When Walt was first involved with television, the network owners were always after him to create a western, because westerns were popular. Walt resisted. He had no interest in doing what others were doing. He liked to set trends, not follow them. Given that, I find it very hard to believe that he'd be interested in using, much less buying, characters that someone else had already fully developed. He was the polar opposite of CEOs like Iger, who find fully-developed, universally recognized characters attractive; all the creative and financial risks of development have been taken - by someone else. Creativity and the risks that go with it are things to be avoided as far as he's concerned. He's as unlike Walt as you can get. Worse than Eisner, even. Which is why I kinda despise the guy.

As for that Muppet movie, I tried to watch it On Demand, and couldn't get through it. It was PATHETIC. The puppets were going around saying "Nobody likes us anymore! Poor poor us!" and begging for the audience's sympathy. When that poor actor did that rap song, that was enough for me. Jeez. No wonder the thing underperformed financially. Big surprise!

Pixar is the one arm of Disney that still has a measure of Walt's creative spirit. It takes risks. I had high hopes when Lasseter was given such a high position in the company. I don't know why he hasn't made more of a difference. Maybe Pixar is more than enough for him to handle. Bummer...
 

Taylor

Well-Known Member
When Walt was first involved with television, the network owners were always after him to create a western, because westerns were popular. Walt resisted. He had no interest in doing what others were doing. He liked to set trends, not follow them. Given that, I find it very hard to believe that he'd be interested in using, much less buying, characters that someone else had already fully developed. He was the polar opposite of CEOs like Iger, who find fully-developed, universally recognized characters attractive; all the creative and financial risks of development have been taken - by someone else. Creativity and the risks that go with it are things to be avoided as far as he's concerned. He's as unlike Walt as you can get. Worse than Eisner, even. Which is why I kinda despise the guy.

As for that Muppet movie, I tried to watch it On Demand, and couldn't get through it. It was PATHETIC. The puppets were going around saying "Nobody likes us anymore! Poor poor us!" and begging for the audience's sympathy. When that poor actor did that rap song, that was enough for me. Jeez. No wonder the thing underperformed financially. Big surprise!

Pixar is the one arm of Disney that still has a measure of Walt's creative spirit. It takes risks. I had high hopes when Lasseter was given such a high position in the company. I don't know why he hasn't made more of a difference. Maybe Pixar is more than enough for him to handle. Bummer...
The Muppets movie that was universally praised by movie critics?
 

Jedeye80

Active Member
Couple thoughts:
- In regards to Indiana Jones, it will be interesting to find out just what rights Paramount has to the franchise. Paramount I suspect will retain the rights to distribute any future films.
I would think, without looking it up, that the rights to the character now fully belong to Disney, opening the door to new attractions. (Somebody get Mike Eisner on the line, he's the one that made the deal. Funny how stuff comes full circle, huh?)

- No. There aren't gonna build a Star Wars park in the US. Probably not anywhere else either. Let's just leave that alone.

- I agree with what was said above, Disney needs to get moving NOW to get new attractions in the pipeline. Fast-track them. Get them up and running within the next, say...three years. People will wait for them...but only for so long before it becomes just...silly.

- I wouldn't want to be Avatarland today. Forgotten...pushed to the back...dismissed....Cameron may be a bit...displeased by today's news.

- Wonder if they would let Joss slide over into Star Wars and hand off Avengers 2. The mind reels at the prospect of a Whedon written/directed Star Wars. Nah...very unlikely.
I can't see why they wouldn't let Whedon do a Star Wars film, after all he did firefly and serenity and serenity is a Star Wars film in all but name, it's even better than all but the first 2 Star Wars films IMO. When I say first two film you know I mean episodes 4 & 5.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom