mergatroid
Well-Known Member
Now comes the telling part about the Disney fan base, as we watch people get more triggered over a CM of the company getting exposed, than the fact children were impacted by sinister behavior.
(For examples: See comments above and most likely following this.)
But when you've seen this rodeo so many times, it's almost expected. Something hits the news about a predator being arrested who works for Disney. Then we usually get the same response from the Disney die-hards:
"This isn't DISNEY's fault. Shame on the media!"
"Why do they always make headlines when it's a Disney employee? Shame on the journalists!"
"Why is this being discussed? Shame!"
"Shame on the OP! Not the correct CM!!" SHAME!!!!"
Then somebody reminds the angry mob that children have been hurt through all this, and suddenly it's...
View attachment 646792
Forgive me. Apparently I'm being very unreasonable for thinking any anger should be toward the predatory behavior, and not the reporting of it.
We'll go through this route yet again the next time there's an O-Town sting operation...
Not worth even trying to makes sense. I'm out of this one. You CM's have fun looking out for your own when these stings occur.
Maybe my head is bizarre for thinking there's a bigger problem than "Oh, there's another person who happens to share the same name so we shouldn't talk about this...it's slander!
Rather ironically the responses you've provided claiming "people get more triggered over a CM of the company getting exposed, than the fact children were impacted by sinister behavior", not once show any sympathy to the children being abused in this story. Now I'm 99.9% sure that you and everyone else assumes it goes without saying that the kids are the most important part of this sordid tale and deserve our concern over everything else. However it's ironic that you make 5 replies to the topic criticising others for not mentioning the true victims whilst not doing so yourself and accusing others of doing what you've done? You seem more triggered by other people's 'predicted' responses than the fact children were impacted by sinister behaviour.The title alone is clickbaitey for readers familiar with the other (innocent) Zach. But as soon as you read the post and see the picture, you know it's not the same person. If people are that easily fooled, then I surely hope someone with my first name and occupation doesn't get busted for something.
Click bait title, yes, if the OP was trying to get attention based on another well known individual.