The other company attempting to get seats on the board has been more critical of Trian than Disney. And there jumping in on Peltz's unforced error...
The activist investor said Nelson Peltz's remarks are an "affront to Disney’s customers, employees and shareholders," and that he should be disqualified from sitting on the board
www.thewrap.com
In addition to addressing Peltz’s comments surrounding Marvel, Blackwells’ letter knocked him for “boasting about his shortcomings” despite lacking “critical expertise.”
It noted that 15 of the 22 companies where Trian has taken a board seat have underperformed the S&P 500 during its tenure on the board. Blackwells added that the companies that have outperformed the market with Trian as a director have ” arguably been the result of management resisting or ignoring Trian’s ideas,” citing examples including Procter & Gamble rejecting a suggestion to movie its Cincinnati headquarters and Pepsi rejecting proposals to merge with Mondelez and dispose of Frito Lay.
The firm also pointed out that Trian has “faced a spate of investor redemptions due to poor performance, shuttering its U.K. fund, and overseeing a collapse of almost 40% of its assets under management” and that it has lost key personnel, including Peltz’s own son-in-law Ed Garden, which it argued is “due in part to Trian’s poor performance.”
“Shareholders, particularly those who espouse the principals of good corporate governance and believe there is a need for change at Disney, do not have to accept the false dichotomy of Mr. Peltz or the status quo Board,” Blackwells wrote. “The Board does not need nominees driven by personal grievances or animus towards management, as we believe Trian Partners’ (“Trian”) nominees Nelson Peltz and Jay Rasulo are.”