Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I think she’ll eventually get another chance but I’ll be surprised if we see her on the big screen again in the next 5 years, 2-3 years for public sentiment to change and then 2 years for her next movies filming, editing, etc.

Her box office record is heavily against her at this point, her talent gets praised in every movie but she simply doesn’t have box office pull.
It depends on what you consider "big screen" movies, not all movies on the "big screen" are $200M budget movies. There are lots of small and mid budget films where an actor can get work and still be released to the box office.

Also its rare to be a "box office draw" these days as no one seems to be able to do it anymore.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
Mr Confirmation Bias strikes again
Ah yes, I’m the only guy here subject to confirmation bias.

Do you use critical thinking abilities when you read articles, Talking? Are you aware of the very strong industry bias of Variety? I bet you are when it’s helpful to your point because you’re a clever fellow.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Now someone will mention The Hunger Games, which made approximately half of what the last Jennifer Lawrence Hunger Games movie did.

I'm surprised her insufferable fans on Twitter don't go and support her, I guess they are just a loud minority.
Now is that her fault or is that a lack of JLaw and franchise fatigue? But I'm sure you'll only blame her and not any of the other reasons.

But we'll be able to see next year when the next prequel comes out.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
Tom can't even do it anymore, at least not like he use to. So that fading fast has already faded in my opinion.
There has been a pretty big drought of new stars, every “big” name draw I thought of was middle age or higher… Tom Cruise, Tom Hanks, Harrison Ford, Jim Carrey, Julia Robert’s, Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Will Smith, Keanu Reaves, Sandra … all middle age or older.

The only young(er) stars that come to mind are Tom Holland, Zendaya, Chris Pratt, and Ryan Reynolds.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
There has been a pretty big drought of new stars, every “big” name draw I thought of was middle age or higher… Tom Cruise, Tom Hanks, Harrison Ford, Jim Carrey, Julia Robert’s, Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Will Smith, Keanu Reaves, Sandra … all middle age or older.

The only young(er) stars that come to mind are Tom Holland, Zendaya, Chris Pratt, and Ryan Reynolds.
We’ve seen copious evidence that none of the people you named can open a film on their own.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
There has been a pretty big drought of new stars, every “big” name draw I thought of was middle age or higher… Tom Cruise, Tom Hanks, Harrison Ford, Jim Carrey, Julia Robert’s, Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Will Smith, Keanu Reaves, Sandra … all middle age or older.

The only young(er) stars that come to mind are Tom Holland, Zendaya, Chris Pratt, and Ryan Reynolds.
Even then those three have been hit or miss too. Its only Spidey for Tom and Zendaya and Deadpool for Reynolds that have been hits. All their other films have either opened soft or outright bombed.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
If we’re honest, outside of Hunger Games and X-Men it’s been uniformly “miss” for over a decade.
Yep, people here aren't realizing that its no longer stars that draw its the IP. Its the reason why original content fails fairly regularly and only franchises succeed. And people wonder why Iger and the rest of Hollywood keep pumping out sequels, prequels, reboots, refreshes, whatever term is the latest for continued IP use.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
There has been a pretty big drought of new stars, every “big” name draw I thought of was middle age or higher… Tom Cruise, Tom Hanks, Harrison Ford, Jim Carrey, Julia Robert’s, Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Will Smith, Keanu Reaves, Sandra … all middle age or older.

The only young(er) stars that come to mind are Tom Holland, Zendaya, Chris Pratt, and Ryan Reynolds.

I'd add maybe Dwayne Johnson but he's not particularly young either
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
I'd add maybe Dwayne Johnson but he's not particularly young either
He REALLY can't open a movie anymore. He NEEDS Moana or he's on the way out of the A-list.

Seriously, none of the "stars" mentioned can open a movie. We've seen this again and again for over a decade! The "star system" as an organizing principle in Hollywood has been dead for 20 years or so. This isn't the 90s!
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Target actually has the movie based dolls on clearance already.

Ooh! I forgot to do my famously beloved and highly scientific Target Toy Aisle Check for this movie! And I've got a Target run to do this week, so maybe I should push that forward to this evening or tomorrow? I'm on it. :cool:

I think she’ll eventually get another chance but I’ll be surprised if we see her on the big screen again in the next 5 years, 2-3 years for public sentiment to change and then 2 years for her next movies filming, editing, etc.

Her box office record is heavily against her at this point, her talent gets praised in every movie but she simply doesn’t have box office pull.

Here's how that box office tally looks for her fledgling young career. She hasn't been in a truly profitable movie yet, and Snow White was arguably her most high profile movie, but she ruined it for herself with needless controversy and commentary. Her career thus far has vaporized over $400 Million in cash spread across several studios, including a low budget horror flick she starred in last year called Y2K (Who knew?!?).

Miss Zegler, Please Call Your Agent.jpg


Assuming Snow White eventually pulls in $300 Million globally, evenly split between the USA and foreigners....

Rachel Zegler Movies: Production $585, Marketing $251, Domestic $250, Overseas $178 = $408 Million Loss
 
Last edited:

TP2000

Well-Known Member
It’s very clear what that article is. A bunch of highly-paid Disney execs who made a series of bottomlessly stupid decisions about the movie are frantically trying to divert attention from their culpability by drawing a target on someone that a lot of people are already primed to hate. It’s utterly unforgivable behavior.



Or, you could go with the theory that the Variety article was simply what it appeared to be; a piece of journalism about an infamously bumbling young star who kept putting her studio, her co-stars, and her mega-budget movie in the crosshairs of scandal with her own repeated and purposely divisive (if not just catty) public statements.

Zegler is toxic. She will find work again but not on a film of this budget.

That or a career on Broadway, where they don’t mind her toxic behavior.

I'm hoping that when Miss Zegler heads back to Broadway, there's a Helen Lawson somewhere who can take her down a few notches in the ladies lounge one evening.

Just substitute the 1960's phrase "booze and dope" for 2020's "TikTok and Tweets". :cool:

 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
Saw this on the weekly box office article on Rotten Tomatoes:

"the only live-action film since 2000 to open in March with less than $50 million and gross over $150 million was Wild Hogs."

It's unlikely Snow White breaks from this trend and pulls a Mufasa like turnaround for all the reasons others have already mentioned. Lower CinemaScore, lower audience Post Trak and Tomatometer, not a holiday release etc

Even a strong strong hold like 3.5x its opening weekend would be just under $150 million domestically.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
a low budget horror flick she starred in last year called Y2K (Who knew?!?).
Those of us that actually follow movies knew, and it was discussed here in this very thread briefly last year.

I've actually also seen it (actually went to the theater for it and everything) and its pretty good. Its a campy 90s nostalgia filled horror/thriller/comedy. As someone who worked in IT during the Y2K panic it was a fun romp through the memories of the fears of the day.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom