Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
YepSplitting hairs,
YepSplitting hairs,
Posting spoilers is very childish.
Quick lesson in RTEs (Rich Text Editors) for phones, if the image is as wide as your text its going to show up huge on any other browser. You can also tell because of the image size, in case your image is 1125x2202 basically that means it'll be long and wide across the screen because that translates to the number of pixels used to display the image, 1200x800 is usually a standard size for best displaying on most screens whether phone or desktop, as it'll be a long but not as wide image. Long story short once you get beyond an 800 width it starts to require scrolling unless you have a wide screen. I would even make it like 900x800, so its a bit easier on the eyes, but that is just personal preference. I think the image I just posted earlier was like 1200x1100, and you can see that was displaying fine on a phone.
Happy to help those less technically inclined.…thanks for the important tip, Mr cook
It’s just courteous to post smaller images so it displays best on all displays. Having a tech background I’m just aware of it more because I post and edit on many different devices and have worked with many different technologies since the beginning of the internet basically.I put no extra effort into pics here. Whatever size it is, it is. 90% posted from my phone.
That's fine. I think it's when people start reading ill intent into such things that we're in trickier territory.Just don’t be surprised when someone comments on a post that your image looks huge.![]()
Is this a thing?It’s just courteous to post smaller images so it displays best on all displays. Having a tech background I’m just aware of it more because I post and edit on many different devices and have worked with many different technologies since the beginning of the internet basically.
But do what makes you happy. Just don’t be surprised when someone comments on a post that your image looks huge.![]()
Is this a thing?
Does anyone actually care? Legit question
Oh yes its a thing. Working in tech I've published a lot of documents and images that are viewable on many platforms. As I always have to be conscious of the devices they will be displayed on I have to make sure that an image that is uploaded isn't going to require a user to scroll too much to view it. So yes its courteous to post smaller images for this reason. Not saying anyone has to follow it, but it is something that many follow when creating content.Is this a thing?
Does anyone actually care? Legit question
In this case I'll apologize for automatically assuming intent. Its just easy to assume though given a specific post and surrounding the topic of box office and the discussion of certain movies falling short at the box office and posters that tend to gloat over that, especially when there is no additional context to go by. So one can see why the post comes across that way.That's fine. I think it's when people start reading ill intent into such things that we're in trickier territory.
We all tend to be less charitable to posters whose opinions we don’t share. I find myself doing it all the time (not liking a post I agree with because of its author, not giving the benefit of the doubt even when it’s deserved, etc.), so please know that I’m not calling you out specifically!In this case I'll apologize for automatically assuming intent. Its just easy to assume though given a specific post and surrounding the topic of box office and the discussion of certain movies falling short at the box office and posters that tend to gloat over that, especially when there is no additional context to go by. So one can see why the post comes across that way.
I think stitch will get the 400 million range final domestic but I think HTTYD next week is going to steal a lot of family attention from it for it to get to past Moana 2 levels.
Speaking of things that came across feeds, I saw this today, anyone looking forward to this and the movie coming later this summer -
View attachment 862492
Resized for your viewing pleasure.![]()
To bring this back to the box office, its really looking like M:I8 isn't even going to break $200M domestic just like the last one, and I'm beginning to think it may not even reach the $172M that the last one did just two years ago.
View attachment 862523
You’re in Japan? Awesome.Inspired by a @TP2000 target run, I’ve done a quick scan of Fukuoka to get the pulse of the health of stitch in the Non-maihama catchment Japan - heading into the box office weekend.
He seems healthy, spotting him filling random gotcha machines around the city. A perusal of a Disney Store has him well represented along with the fab five. A good amount of Zootopia (for the year end) and the always quizzical adoration of Lotso. I think this random wall of stickers and bands captures the franchises they rather like.
View attachment 862580
View attachment 862581
Lots of movie displays, but also noted a bunch of Minecraft and this is the launch day for Mario Kart World (Switch 2) and a new Pokemon TCG expansion. Those also are dominating the vibes.
Signing off.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.