• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

TP2000

Well-Known Member
To actually watch the movie before commenting on its story?

We're not talking artistic merits here in this thread, much less stuff like technical editing or sound or lighting. And to her credit, Miss Zegler apparently does have real talent and got generally good reviews for her work here.

It's a shame Miss Zegler can't just let her work speak for herself, instead of letting her Instagram rants overshadow her work.

We're mostly talking about the scandals that started in 2023, created mostly by the star herself and her own words. Over and over again, as she just seemed incapable of shutting up about it on her own Social Media or in PR stunts at picket lines and such. With of course, honorable mentions to Mr. Dinklage and Burbank's eunuch execs and humorless HR managers.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
And what's Peter Dinklage up to now, I wonder?
If you actually watched modern movies or TV you'd now.

He was just in Wicked.
He has 3 movies coming out this year, including the sequel to Wicked.
He is on the new Dexter TV show.

So to say the least he is not just sitting at home twiddling this thumbs.

And thus this shouldn't be a question you ask about any actor as you don't pay attention or care anyways. And an 8 second google search that you normal do should be able to answer that for you.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
If you actually watched modern movies or TV you'd now.

He was just in Wicked.
He has 3 movies coming out this year, including the sequel to Wicked.
He is on the new Dexter TV show.

So to say the least he is not just sitting at home twiddling this thumbs.

And thus this shouldn't be a question you ask about any actor as you don't pay attention or care anyways.

That was my point exactly. He's actually working. While seven other actors with dwarfism are not. ;)
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Quick, without a 8 second google search who are the 2 actors with dwarfism in this movie?

I don't know their names. Who cares who they are? They're supporting actors in 2025, why would I know them?

What I think is stupid is that Peter Dinklage got to kill off 7 gigs for actors with dwarfism, while he still has a busy career. It was a stupid and unnecessary bout of woke nonsense. And the movie apparently was handicapped for it, as many folks have commented how forced into the new story the CGI dwarves are as they were added in post-production in 2024. Messy!
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Both Zegler and Gadot look white to me. Sure, they aren't Northern European white, but I would struggle to categorise them as another "race".

I agree with you on that. I thought it was much ado about nothing, as Rachel Zegler looks more Italian to me than anything.

But having traveled quite a bit in Mexico and Asia, I know how race-conscious those cultures are and how outright bold they can be in their racial prejudices. It didn't surprise me that Little Mermaid did poorly in Central America and Japan, and it wouldn't surprise me to know audiences stayed away from Snow White in Asia or parts of Europe due to racial prejudice.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I don't know their names. Who cares who they are? They're supporting actors in 2025, why would I know them?

What I think is stupid is that Peter Dinklage got to kill off 7 gigs for actors with dwarfism, while he still has a busy career. It was a stupid and unnecessary bout of woke nonsense. And the movie apparently was handicapped for it, as many folks have commented how forced into the new story the CGI dwarves are as they were added in post-production in 2024. Messy!
Except he didn't, not 7. If you want to get technical he got 6 if you're only counting the dwarf roles.

Martin Klebba stars as Grumpy. Something that should have been a gimme for you since it was discussed at great length in the Snow White thread where you had a field day of comments when it was active.

George Appleby is the other actor and he is one of Jonathan's Bandits.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Martin Klebba stars as Grumpy. Something that should have been a gimme for you since it was discussed at great length in the Snow White thread where you had a field day of comments when it was active.

George Appleby is the other actor and he one of Jonathan's Bandits.

I have absolutely no earthly idea who either of those two men are. I trust they are doing well?

Burbank execs needed to stand up, politely, to Peter Dinklage when he went on his dwarf rant. Although, I do remember the vapid and limp statements from Disney's HR team about dwarves being in a movie about seven dwarves to be hilariously funny at the time. So at least we got a few chuckles out of Burbank's spineless incompetence, even if a half dozen paying gigs went to computer technicians instead of human actors. 🤣
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I have absolutely no earthly idea who either of those two men are. I trust they are doing well?

Burbank execs needed to stand up, politely, to Peter Dinklage when he went on his dwarf rant. Although, I do remember the vapid and limp statements from Disney's HR team about dwarves being in a movie about seven dwarves to be hilariously funny at the time. So at least we got a few chuckles out of Burbank's spineless incompetence, even if a half dozen paying gigs went to computer technicians instead of human actors. 🤣
I think no matter what Disney did (either hired 7 actors or did the CG route) there was going to be an uproar one way or the other. Hire 7 actors and it could be seen as insensitive to the community. Don't hire 6 other actors and hire 1 and go CG and it could be seen as insensitive to the community.

Basically they did what Disney always does which is just move forward and damn the uproar.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
there was going to be an uproar one way or the other. Hire 7 actors and it could be seen as insensitive to the community.
I didn't scavenge the Internet to look. But I didn't see any real support for what Peter said. I did see negativity against his statements. Disney made the wrong choice. Especially taking advice from Dinklage, the guy who became known playing a part where it was a big Santa's elf gag. So I think any blowback would have been less just sticking to live action.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I didn't scavenge the Internet to look. But I didn't see any real support for what Peter said. I did see negativity against his statements. Disney made the wrong choice. Especially taking advice from Dinklage, the guy who became known playing a part where it was a big Santa's elf gag. So I think any blowback would have been less just sticking to live action.
If you can't imagine in 2025 there wouldn't be uproar if Disney went the full dwarf actor route, you're kidding yourself. In a time where there is outrage at the drop of a hat over the most silliest things, I can almost guarantee it would have happened. Now would it have been enough to affect the movie, I can't say, but uproar would have happened.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
If you can't imagine in 2025 there wouldn't be uproar if Disney went the full dwarf actor route, you're kidding yourself. In a time where there is outrage at the drop of a hat over the most silliest things, I can almost guarantee it would have happened. Now would it have been enough to affect the movie, I can't say, but uproar would have happened.
And if they put the dwarfs in a movie that was faithful to the original, they would have had Snow White embarrassing them into washing up before dinner and teaching them table manners as if they were children.

Yeah that would have gone over well with Peter Dinklage.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
If you can't imagine in 2025 there wouldn't be uproar if Disney went the full dwarf actor route, you're kidding yourself. In a time where there is outrage at the drop of a hat over the most silliest things, I can almost guarantee it would have happened. Now would it have been enough to affect the movie, I can't say, but uproar would have happened.
I didn't say people wouldn't make a fuss. I said it would be less. Of course people will be offended either way. But the guy doesn't speak for the entire community. Don't forget, he played a dwarf character early in his career too. I've seen plenty of support for live actors. I've seen almost no support for Dinklages take. I guess it doesn't matter at this point. It's just one more thing on the pile of nonsense associated with this film.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Yeah that would have gone over well with Peter Dinklage.
Do people care what he thinks though? He played a dwarf in Narnia and a character making a joke of it with the Santas elf gag.

Here's an interview with Greg Doherty. He played a goblin in Harry Potter.

"Film work for little people doesn't come around too often, but when it does it's really enjoyable, which makes what Disney is doing so disappointing. I think they've gone backwards. What they have done is deny very talented and hard-working people with dwarfism that are out there and could have fulfilled these roles."

"You can see them in their interviews, on the streets; they aren't CGI dwarves, they're real people. There are many people that I know with dwarfism and this has upset them. By Disney doing this, they've gotten rid of those little people being able to have a chance for community in and around the shoots, and have basically said they don't need these people in the future."

If those roles weren't available, Dinklage might never have broken out. One person doesn't speak for a community, that's all I'm saying. His view on it is no more valid than another with dwarfism.
 
Last edited:

Chi84

Premium Member
Do people care what he thinks though? He played a dwarf in Narnia and a character making a joke of it with the Santas elf gag.

Here's an interview with Greg Doherty. He played a goblin in Harry Potter.

"Film work for little people doesn't come around too often, but when it does it's really enjoyable, which makes what Disney is doing so disappointing. I think they've gone backwards. What they have done is deny very talented and hard-working people with dwarfism that are out there and could have fulfilled these roles."

"You can see them in their interviews, on the streets; they aren't CGI dwarves, they're real people. There are many people that I know with dwarfism and this has upset them. By Disney doing this, they've gotten rid of those little people being able to have a chance for community in and around the shoots, and have basically said they don't need these people in the future."

If those rolls weren't available, Dinklage might never have broken out. One person doesn't speak for a community, that's all I'm saying. His view on it is no more valid than another with dwarfism.
People do care what he thinks, probably because he is a well-respected, award winning actor.

From what I read here, people care deeply about what actors say. More than about the movie.
 
Last edited:

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
People do care what he thinks, probably because he is a well-respected, award winning actor.
So he transcends the whole community? Don't get me wrong, I've liked just about everything he's been in. But he was given that opportunity with roles that he's opposing. Now if Disney comes out and says they did all theses focus groups and says the community overwhelmingly said it's insulting to play those roles. Ok fine. But based on the reaction to the film and cgi dwarfs. I'd say Peter should just take the L on this one. I'd ask you, why is his opinion more valid than the interview I posted?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom