LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
To actually watch the movie before commenting on its story?Did I forget anything?
To actually watch the movie before commenting on its story?Did I forget anything?
To actually watch the movie before commenting on its story?
If you actually watched modern movies or TV you'd now.And what's Peter Dinklage up to now, I wonder?
If you actually watched modern movies or TV you'd now.
He was just in Wicked.
He has 3 movies coming out this year, including the sequel to Wicked.
He is on the new Dexter TV show.
So to say the least he is not just sitting at home twiddling this thumbs.
And thus this shouldn't be a question you ask about any actor as you don't pay attention or care anyways.
Do you actually know 7 other actors with dwarfism? Let alone be able to actually comment on their careers?That was my point exactly. He's actually working. While seven other actors with dwarfism are not.![]()
Not hard to figure outWe'll just never know why Snow White flopped so badly. We'll just never know.![]()
Do you actually know 7 other actors with dwarfism? Let alone be able to actually comment on their careers?
Do you even know that the movie does actually have 2 actors with dwarfism in it?
Quick, without a 8 second google search who are the 2 actors with dwarfism in this movie?Yes, I do know that. I watch Bill Maher, and he had a hilarious take on this nonsense on a recent show.
Quick, without a 8 second google search who are the 2 actors with dwarfism in this movie?
Both Zegler and Gadot look white to me. Sure, they aren't Northern European white, but I would struggle to categorise them as another "race".
Except he didn't, not 7. If you want to get technical he got 6 if you're only counting the dwarf roles.I don't know their names. Who cares who they are? They're supporting actors in 2025, why would I know them?
What I think is stupid is that Peter Dinklage got to kill off 7 gigs for actors with dwarfism, while he still has a busy career. It was a stupid and unnecessary bout of woke nonsense. And the movie apparently was handicapped for it, as many folks have commented how forced into the new story the CGI dwarves are as they were added in post-production in 2024. Messy!
Martin Klebba stars as Grumpy. Something that should have been a gimme for you since it was discussed at great length in the Snow White thread where you had a field day of comments when it was active.
George Appleby is the other actor and he one of Jonathan's Bandits.
I think no matter what Disney did (either hired 7 actors or did the CG route) there was going to be an uproar one way or the other. Hire 7 actors and it could be seen as insensitive to the community. Don't hire 6 other actors and hire 1 and go CG and it could be seen as insensitive to the community.I have absolutely no earthly idea who either of those two men are. I trust they are doing well?
Burbank execs needed to stand up, politely, to Peter Dinklage when he went on his dwarf rant. Although, I do remember the vapid and limp statements from Disney's HR team about dwarves being in a movie about seven dwarves to be hilariously funny at the time. So at least we got a few chuckles out of Burbank's spineless incompetence, even if a half dozen paying gigs went to computer technicians instead of human actors.![]()
I didn't scavenge the Internet to look. But I didn't see any real support for what Peter said. I did see negativity against his statements. Disney made the wrong choice. Especially taking advice from Dinklage, the guy who became known playing a part where it was a big Santa's elf gag. So I think any blowback would have been less just sticking to live action.there was going to be an uproar one way or the other. Hire 7 actors and it could be seen as insensitive to the community.
If you can't imagine in 2025 there wouldn't be uproar if Disney went the full dwarf actor route, you're kidding yourself. In a time where there is outrage at the drop of a hat over the most silliest things, I can almost guarantee it would have happened. Now would it have been enough to affect the movie, I can't say, but uproar would have happened.I didn't scavenge the Internet to look. But I didn't see any real support for what Peter said. I did see negativity against his statements. Disney made the wrong choice. Especially taking advice from Dinklage, the guy who became known playing a part where it was a big Santa's elf gag. So I think any blowback would have been less just sticking to live action.
And if they put the dwarfs in a movie that was faithful to the original, they would have had Snow White embarrassing them into washing up before dinner and teaching them table manners as if they were children.If you can't imagine in 2025 there wouldn't be uproar if Disney went the full dwarf actor route, you're kidding yourself. In a time where there is outrage at the drop of a hat over the most silliest things, I can almost guarantee it would have happened. Now would it have been enough to affect the movie, I can't say, but uproar would have happened.
I didn't say people wouldn't make a fuss. I said it would be less. Of course people will be offended either way. But the guy doesn't speak for the entire community. Don't forget, he played a dwarf character early in his career too. I've seen plenty of support for live actors. I've seen almost no support for Dinklages take. I guess it doesn't matter at this point. It's just one more thing on the pile of nonsense associated with this film.If you can't imagine in 2025 there wouldn't be uproar if Disney went the full dwarf actor route, you're kidding yourself. In a time where there is outrage at the drop of a hat over the most silliest things, I can almost guarantee it would have happened. Now would it have been enough to affect the movie, I can't say, but uproar would have happened.
Do people care what he thinks though? He played a dwarf in Narnia and a character making a joke of it with the Santas elf gag.Yeah that would have gone over well with Peter Dinklage.
People do care what he thinks, probably because he is a well-respected, award winning actor.Do people care what he thinks though? He played a dwarf in Narnia and a character making a joke of it with the Santas elf gag.
Here's an interview with Greg Doherty. He played a goblin in Harry Potter.
"Film work for little people doesn't come around too often, but when it does it's really enjoyable, which makes what Disney is doing so disappointing. I think they've gone backwards. What they have done is deny very talented and hard-working people with dwarfism that are out there and could have fulfilled these roles."
"You can see them in their interviews, on the streets; they aren't CGI dwarves, they're real people. There are many people that I know with dwarfism and this has upset them. By Disney doing this, they've gotten rid of those little people being able to have a chance for community in and around the shoots, and have basically said they don't need these people in the future."
If those rolls weren't available, Dinklage might never have broken out. One person doesn't speak for a community, that's all I'm saying. His view on it is no more valid than another with dwarfism.
So he transcends the whole community? Don't get me wrong, I've liked just about everything he's been in. But he was given that opportunity with roles that he's opposing. Now if Disney comes out and says they did all theses focus groups and says the community overwhelmingly said it's insulting to play those roles. Ok fine. But based on the reaction to the film and cgi dwarfs. I'd say Peter should just take the L on this one. I'd ask you, why is his opinion more valid than the interview I posted?People do care what he thinks, probably because he is a well-respected, award winning actor.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.