Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Chi84

Premium Member
ChatGPT 4.5 Deep Research answering question:

“Did Disney originally expect huge box office numbers for Snow White when the movie was announced to be made in 2019?”

Disney’s Initial Expectations for the Live-Action Snow White (2019)

Announcement and Remake Strategy in 2019

Disney’s intent to remake Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was first confirmed in 2016, but the project gained momentum in 2019 as part of the studio’s live-action remake boom . By May 2019, Disney had director Marc Webb (of The Amazing Spider-Man fame) in talks, and he was officially announced by September 2019 . The film was envisioned as a theatrical tentpole release – not a streaming project – aligning with Disney’s strategy of reimagining animated classics for the big screen. Executives slated production to begin in 2020 (before COVID-19 delays) , signaling that Snow White was a priority in the post-Aladdin and Lion King pipeline. This timing positioned Snow White as a flagship entry in Disney’s ongoing remake slate, not a niche experiment.

Riding the Wave of Billion-Dollar Remakes

Disney had strong reasons to expect Snow White to be a major theatrical success. The few years prior saw several live-action remakes turn into box-office juggernauts. Beauty and the Beast (2017) grossed a colossal $1.263 billion worldwide , and Aladdin (2019) likewise soared past the $1 billion mark – outcomes that proved audiences would flock to lavish re-stagings of beloved Disney musicals. In fact, 2019’s The Lion King (another remake) became one of the highest-grossing films ever with well over $1.5B globally (though it was virtually an animated CG remake). Coming off these successes, Snow White – as Disney’s original princess story – was expected to “stomp the competition” at the box office . Industry observers in 2019 speculated that a property as iconic as Snow White could follow the pattern of Beauty and Aladdin, which had been among their year’s top earners. The remake formula was clearly working for Disney, so anticipation was high that Snow White would become the next family blockbuster in line.

Disney’s Expectations and Positioning

Internally, Disney treated Snow White as a key piece of its live-action remake strategy, which by 2019 had become a lucrative enterprise. The studio’s leadership emphasized how revisiting classics attracted broad, multi-generational audiences and boosted Disney’s broader businesses (merchandise, theme parks, Disney+ content) in tandem . Even if some remakes drew mixed reviews, they reliably drew big crowds – as Reuters noted, these films “tend to perform quite well at the box office” despite lukewarm critical enthusiasm . Disney was riding a record-breaking box office year in 2019 (with seven releases surpassing $1B globally), and Snow White was positioned to continue that streak. With the company pouring substantial resources into the project – reportedly over $200 million in budget, a level usually reserved for tentpole franchises – it’s clear Disney expected a significant return on investment. Simply put, Snow White was never intended as a modest release; it was banked on as a major theatrical event that could replicate the commercial magic of its remake predecessors.

Disney’s live-action Snow White (portrayed by Rachel Zegler) with the Seven Dwarfs. As the remake of Walt Disney’s 1937 animated classic, the film was envisioned as a big-budget musical fantasy aimed at today’s audiences.

Creative Team and Ambitions

From the outset, Disney assembled an A-list creative team for Snow White, signaling high ambitions for the film’s quality and appeal. Marc Webb was hired to direct, bringing experience in both character-driven drama (500 Days of Summer) and large-scale spectacle (Marvel’s Spider-Man) . The songwriting duo Benj Pasek and Justin Paul – known for hit musicals (La La Land, The Greatest Showman) – were commissioned to write new songs for Snow White . (Pasek & Paul had just contributed music to 2019’s Aladdin, so their involvement bridged the remake successes.) This indicated Disney’s intent to make Snow White a full-fledged musical extravaganza, much like Beauty and the Beast, rather than a straightforward retelling. Longtime Disney collaborator Marc Platt was on board as a producer (he previously produced Mary Poppins Returns and Into the Woods), underscoring the studio’s confidence in the film as a prestige project. Even before casting, the creative choices suggested Disney was targeting the broad family audience that had embraced prior live-action musicals – blending nostalgia for older fans with fresh elements for new generations.

Casting Choices and Target Audience

When casting news eventually broke (slightly after 2019, but stemming from the film’s development goals), it further reflected Disney’s big aspirations and inclusive target audience. In June 2021, the relatively unknown Rachel Zegler (then 20 years old) was cast as Snow White, just before her breakout in West Side Story. Director Marc Webb praised Zegler’s “strength, intelligence and optimism” as integral to “rediscovering the joy” in the classic fairy tale . Choosing a young Latina actress with powerhouse vocals signaled Disney’s aim to update Snow White for a modern, diverse audience while still honoring its princess legacy. Meanwhile, Disney tapped Gal Gadot – an internationally famous actress from Wonder Woman – to play the Evil Queen, bringing star power and adult audience appeal to the project . Gadot’s excitement about “stepping into the shoes and crown” of this iconic villainess underscored the film’s event status. These casting decisions indicated that Disney was courting all quadrants: children and families (with a youthful new princess to root for), nostalgia-driven viewers (with a story they grew up on), and even global action-fantasy fans (with Gadot’s draw). In short, everything about the early announcements – from creative team to casting buzz – pointed to Disney positioning Snow White as a major theatrical tentpole with broad appeal, on par with its billion-dollar remake predecessors.

Early Media Speculation and Forecasts (2019–2020)

When Snow White was announced, media outlets and industry analysts largely assumed it would be another huge hit for Disney, barring any unforeseen issues. The studio’s live-action remake track record through 2019 made it “the fairest of them all” in box office terms – hence expectations for Snow White were optimistic. Some commentary did note potential challenges, such as Snow White coming after other studios’ versions of the tale (2012’s Mirror Mirror and Snow White and the Huntsman). But Disney’s Snow White had the advantage of the trusted Disney brand and the musical formula that had just propelled Aladdin and The Lion King to enormous success. Early on, observers mused that a “beloved Disney property like ‘Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs’ is supposed to stomp the competition” – in other words, anything short of dominating the box office would be surprising. While Disney did not publicly release a numeric target, the internal and external narrative in 2019 cast Snow White as a film with billion-dollar potential. In investor circles, Disney’s pipeline of remakes (including Mulan, The Little Mermaid, and Snow White) was cited as a reliable growth driver, given the past performance of similar titles. The general sentiment was that Snow White would be one of Disney’s marquee theatrical releases in the coming years, expected to draw massive crowds as the next live-action chapter of a timeless fairy tale.

Conclusion

In summary, when the live-action Snow White was first being unveiled in 2019, Disney undoubtedly expected it to be a major theatrical success. The project was launched on the heels of multiple $1B-plus hits from the same remake strategy, and Disney approached it with commensurate scale and confidence. From the high-profile creative talent and considerable budget, to the deliberate positioning alongside films like Beauty and the Beast (2017) and Aladdin (2019), every sign pointed to Disney viewing Snow White as a potential blockbuster meant to enchant global audiences. As one report later quipped, a classic IP like Snow White was “supposed to” be a surefire hit – highlighting just how high the expectations were at the outset.

Sources:


• Walt Disney Company – Snow White project development timeline


• Cinemark News – Snow White production details & creative team


• Beauty and the Beast (2017) box office – $1.263B worldwide


• Aladdin (2019) box office – $1.05B worldwide


• Reuters – Disney’s remake strategy and Snow White budget context


• Hollywood in Toto – commentary on Snow White and past remake performance


• PEOPLE – casting announcements (Rachel Zegler, Gal Gadot) and director quotes
That’s a lot of AI. Are you sure you’re not toeing the line on what’s allowed here?
 

MagicMouseFan

Well-Known Member
That’s a lot of AI. Are you sure you’re not toeing the line on what’s allowed here?
Excellent question.

I’m using a service everyone on the planet will use or are using now and I’m using it as an evolved search engine. Based on a 15 minute deep search, that is the information it gathered and reported.
Internet never went away, it was never a fad.
AI is not going away and will be used for knowledge and information.

I think what’s important… and this is very important…
You must let everyone know the prompt used.
So for this search, I used the prompt:

“Did disney originally expect huge box office numbers for Snow White when the movie was announced to make in 2019? “

Everyone is on the same page with the information provided and can read the report and then do their own due diligence if they so choose.
 

MagicMouseFan

Well-Known Member
I have never used it and never shall (at least not willingly or knowingly—I hate the fact that it’s now woven into Google searches).
There is nothing wrong with not using a new technology.
My Grandmother said she was scared of the telephone when they first got one in the house.
Many said the same thing when the internet came out when I got out of college… it didn’t stop the internet.

We don’t have this message board without the internet.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
The simple fact is that Disney’s theatrical brand is lower than it was five years ago, rarely turning out hits at the scale that was common pre-2020. It’s a problem that’s plagued all studios since it reflects theatrical industry drops across the board.

What’s pretty clear is that Disney/Iger have no plan to course correct, just sticking to the same playbook and hoping the next sequel/remake makes a billion. Strongly suspect the next CEO will reevaluate Disney’s theatrical strategy.

Disney diagnoses is that the sequels/remakes need to be of a better quality and that's why some of them haven't fared so well.

Then questions then are a) is that really the case? and b) has Disney's reputation taken a hit such that even if the upcoming ones are better will people think twice about going because they've been burned before?
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
That’s just silly on its face. I don’t know why you keep repeating it.
Just stating my observation. You are of course free to call it silly.

My observation is Disney makes the movies they want to make, it appears to me the money does not matter, they will spend whatever money they need to spend to finish a movie for better or worse.

Some will return a profit, many won’t but that doesn’t stop Disney from telling stories they want to tell, and sometimes re tell previous stories the way todays Disney wants to tell them.
 
Last edited:

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
Disney diagnoses is that the sequels/remakes need to be of a better quality and that's why some of them haven't fared so well.

Then questions then are a) is that really the case? and b) has Disney's reputation taken a hit such that even if the upcoming ones are better will people think twice about going because they've been burned before?
You’d hope Burbank would realize the 2024 success of Inside Out, Deadpool, and Moana had more to do with timing and novelty nostalgia than the quality of those films.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
You’d hope Burbank would realize the 2024 success of Inside Out, Deadpool, and Moana had more to do with timing and novelty nostalgia than the quality of those films.

Deadpool 3 was an almost guaranteed hit, but Inside Out 2 becoming the highest grossing animated movie ever was pure luck that no one saw coming, and as successful as Moana 2 was I'd say the reason its release was so front loaded* and didn't make even more was the less than stellar reaction to it.

*It made about 1/2 of its domestic gross in its first 5 days of release
 
Last edited:

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Well-played, sir.

 

Chi84

Premium Member
There is nothing wrong with not using a new technology.
My Grandmother said she was scared of the telephone when they first got one in the house.
Many said the same thing when the internet came out when I got out of college… it didn’t stop the internet.

We don’t have this message board without the internet.
I don’t object to it. It’s clearly identified as AI and easy enough to skip over if one is not interested.

I personally find it of limited value but then people are posting screenshots of theaters seating charts so . . .
 

MoonRakerSCM

Well-Known Member
Good morning from the San Diego 5k! I'm still training for a half in May so I only managed the 5k this morning. My friends are much more trained than I am and currently just passed the 10k split in the half marathon. Im enjoying my now traditional (unless I switch back to the half) post 5k bottomless mimosas and fruit platter at Provisional Kitchen in the Gaslamp Quarter. The grapefruit is particularly spectacular this morning. I figured I'd check out the local theaters down here SD way this AM, ya know, in case we get a sudden hankering for a bit of post race Snow White... but my fears of not being able to find a seat are quite unfounded this morning-

Screenshot_20250323_082515_Chrome.jpg


Screenshot_20250323_082545_Chrome.jpg
 

MagicMouseFan

Well-Known Member
I don’t object to it. It’s clearly identified as AI and easy enough to skip over if one is not interested.

I personally find it of limited value but then people are posting screenshots of theaters seating charts so . . .
Exactly, I’m the opposite. I find it fascinating and love doing deep dives.

But yes… each their own and no one has to read the information discovered.

But it does look like and rightfully so back in 2019 that Disney was expecting Snow White to make 1 billion at the box office. To be fair 2019 was a different world for the movie business.
 
Last edited:

MagicMouseFan

Well-Known Member
I don’t remember anyone saying that. There’s a huge difference between the internet itself and the multiple activities and services it hosts. There are many such activities and services that I refuse to use; ChatGBT is among them.
I encourage you to never use AI, I for one feel it will help my company and will be hugely impactful in my kids lives and want them comfortable with the pros and cons.


For the internet… It exploded our business out of college when everyone in my family’s industry said it was a fad. Including my father until he saw the benefits.

Teachers in college forbid the use of internet to look up information and said we had to go to the library.
We searched on the internet anyway for our research.

Clifford Stoll famously wrote a piece in Newsweek titled “Why the Web Won’t Be Nirvana,” arguing that the internet was cumbersome, slow, and impractical, suggesting it would fade away after initial curiosity passed.
 
Last edited:

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I don’t object to it.
I do. It’s not a question of fear, as the poster you’re replying to suggested, but of seeing the damage it’s already done to education and wanting no part of it. Many students no longer feel the need to think or speak for themselves; they are getting AI to write their essays for them. The effects of this shift are truly depressing. I will never endorse a tool that is leading us to stop using our own brains and words.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
I do. It’s not a question of fear, as the poster you’re replying to suggested, but of seeing the damage it’s already done to education and wanting no part of it. Many students no longer feel the need to think or speak for themselves; they are getting AI to write their essays for them. The effects of this shift are truly depressing. I will never endorse a tool that is leading us to stop using our own brains and words.
You’re right. I agree. My response was that I don’t object to their posts here because they don’t appear to violate the TOS.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I encourage you to never use AI, I for one feel it will help my company and will be hugely impactful in my kids lives and want them comfortable with the pros and cons.


For the internet… It exploded our business out of college when everyone in my families industry said it was a fad. Including my father until he saw the benefits.

Teachers in college forbid the use of internet to look up information and said we had to go to the library.
We searched on the internet anyway for our research.

Clifford Stoll famously wrote a piece in Newsweek titled “Why the Web Won’t Be Nirvana,” arguing that the internet was cumbersome, slow, and impractical, suggesting it would fade away after initial curiosity passed.
I have no idea why you’re conflating an opposition to AI with opposition to the internet. That would be like saying someone opposed to online p*rn is opposed to the internet just because the latter is the locus of the former.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom