donaldtoo
Well-Known Member
I see you understand what an "awards show" is.
Read the next post below yours.
And don’t talk down to me anymore.
I see you understand what an "awards show" is.
It puzzles me that so many cite political content as the reason the Oscars have lost viewership. Probably the most political moments in the ceremonies’ history occurred in the ’70s, long before the drop in figures.Then it became a stand for politics, and that was a big turn off.
If you “could care less that means you do care at least a little.” Weird Al Yankovic, Word Crimes.I agree. I am "older" too and grew up watching the Oscars every year. It was an "event" that we didn't miss!
Then it became a stand for politics, and that was a big turn off. Many years later, I could care less about the Oscars and won't watch them anymore.
Yes. I’ve always been confused when people say “I could care less” when what they mean is “I couldn’t care less” for example I couldn’t care less about the Oscars.If you “could care less that means you do care at least a little.” Weird Al Yankovic, Word Crimes.
Neither could IYes. I’ve always been confused when people say “I could care less” when what they mean is “I couldn’t care less” for example I couldn’t care less about the Oscars.
I sure wouldn’t want my job to depend on the fate of Thunderbolts.The final box office tally is in from overseas through March 3rd for Captain America: Brave New World.
After it's third full weekend globally, it looks fairly certain it won't get to Ant-Man Quantumania territory. It still could reach $400 Million globally by the end of its box office run though. That would be a loss of around $50 Million for Marvel's latest.
View attachment 847119
![]()
Captain America: Brave New World (2025) - Box Office and Financial Information
Financial analysis of Captain America: Brave New World (2025) including production budget, domestic and international box office gross, DVD and Blu-ray sales reports.www.the-numbers.com
I’m in this category also, grew up watching it, couldn’t care less now.I agree. I am "older" too and grew up watching the Oscars every year. It was an "event" that we didn't miss!
Then it became a stand for politics, and that was a big turn off. Many years later, I could care less about the Oscars and won't watch them anymore.
I don’t think the general public is more interested in Pugh than the Captain America brand. But she does have a following outside of MCU so we’ll see.
UPDATED: Nielsen’s finalized reporting of Sunday’s Oscars telecast has brought the total from 18.1 to 19.7 million viewers. Rather than a 7% decrease from last year’s show, this indicates a 1% increase.
Per ABC, the discrepancy came from a significant portion of younger viewers tuning in via mobile devices and personal computers, which were not represented in Nielsen’s fast national data. The new total is a five-year high for the Oscars in both total viewers and rating among adults age 18-49, which rose from 3.92 to 4.54, a 19% improvement on last year’s 3.82
It puzzles me that so many cite political content as the reason the Oscars have lost viewership. Probably the most political moments in the ceremonies’ history occurred in the ’70s, long before the drop in figures.
They did update the headline after you posted it.I'm sure this'll just prompt another post about how it's not 1975 anymore, but oh. Hey. It turns out that ratings were actually up this year.
![]()
Oscars Hit 19.7 Million Viewers, Up 1% From Last Year
19.7 million viewers tuned into Sunday's Oscars, a 1% increase from last year, according to finalized reporting from Nielsen.variety.com
And... I see that they didn't update the headline, so:
It's just like if a movie bombs, it's a cue to blame politics. If a movie does well, any political commentary is conveniently ignored.
It puzzles me that so many cite political content as the reason the Oscars have lost viewership. Probably the most political moments in the ceremonies’ history occurred in the ’70s, long before the drop in figures.
I'm sure this'll just prompt another post about how it's not 1975 anymore, but oh. Hey. It turns out that ratings were actually up this year.
![]()
Oscars Hit 19.7 Million Viewers, Up 1% From Last Year
19.7 million viewers tuned into Sunday's Oscars, a 1% increase from last year, according to finalized reporting from Nielsen.variety.com
And... I see that they didn't update the headline, so:
Ok Boomer, or maybe realize that not everyone consumes media via a TV anymore, this isn't 1972 where a household only consumes media via a single TV and everyone gathers around it to watch the Brady Bunch. Media is consumed in many different ways today, and the younger generations are less likely to own an actual TV instead choosing to use one of their many other devices to watch media.Nielsen found a million kids watching the Oscars on their computer screens and phones? These poor children don't have a proper TV set? Or were they grounded in their room and watching under the covers?
Regardless, I've created an updated chart of the Oscars annual viewership since 2000, in case anyone wants to print this out and put it on their fridge.
And here's Fun Facts for you to use at your next dinner party:
19.7 Million people is 5.7% of the US population in 2025
19.7 Million people is 17% less people than the 23.6 Million who watched the Oscars in 2020
19.7 Million people is 58% less people than the 46.3 Million who watched the Oscars in 2000
19.7 Million people is the amount of visitors Disneyland got in total from 1955 to 1961!![]()
View attachment 847172
Nielsen found a million kids watching the Oscars on their computer screens and phones? These poor children don't have a proper TV set? Or were they grounded in their room and watching under the covers?
You're a Nielsen "family," so if you read the instructions you should understand how this all works.
Anyway, there's a pretty decent correlation (R^2 = .6566) between number of movie tickets sold and viewership of the following year's Oscars (using data back to 1995), which makes pretty good sense to me. If people come back to the theaters more and more, then these ratings should go up correspondingly.
You assumed he read it and understood it. I mean we know he doesn't follow their basic instructions of not talking about it on the internet since he posted proudly here about it.
Her purported Native ancestry has been disputed by multiple family members. Mary Louise Cruz.Aside from that young Indian lady who accepted an award for someone (I can't remember who) and gave a short protest speech on the plight of the American Indian, which elicited boos from the celebrity audience, I can't think of any big political moments or themes during the 1970's shows. And then John Wayne got all upset about it, which fueled the stunt further.
I may have just forgotten, and I'm sure there was something besides the Indian lady, but the tone and shift was noticeable and rather off-putting in the 2010's. I don't remember the 70's Oscars being that way year after year, much less the 80's or 90's.
Ok Boomer, or maybe realize that not everyone consumes media via a TV anymore, this isn't 1972 where a household only consumes media via a single TV and everyone gathers around it to watch the Brady Bunch.
But still it shows the Oscars, something you should be raving about, seems to be making a trend back in the right direction with viewership on the rise. And that its the younger generation that is paving the way for this. So you can rest assured that there may actually be a resurgence of your classic Oscar parties you mourn aren't happening anymore.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.