Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

TP2000

Well-Known Member
"People don't want to be preached to", i.e. people don't want black mermaids and gay characters in movies. It's saying, if you're a minority, YOU are part of the reason people didn't like a movie or won't go see it. YOU are not suitable for family entertainment. YOUR existence is a bad thing.

As a gay man myself, I'll tackle the gay issue specifically.

Why do you think Strange World flopped so horribly around the globe from Mexico to Finland to Brazil, while Inside Out 2 is doing gangbuster business in all of those same countries with the same audiences?

I think it's because most human parents on planet Earth aren't comfortable taking their 8 year old child to a Disney cartoon movie about a gay child. If Disney wants to continue making profitable movies that most Earthlings will take their young children to, they'd be wise to accept that and learn from it.

Data Doesn't Lie.jpg
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
And stop telling everyone how awesome you are, it’s very silly.
You’re projecting and that’s not coming from me…

How did all this come up again? Oh right…the SUCCESS of inside out was being talked about and the same handful of sock puppets decided to say the “hate conspiracy” torpedoed the last round of flops…

Just take the L and move on.

You don’t own Disneys failures. And why? Cause they don’t care that you…or I…exist!

It’s liberating
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
As a gay man myself, I'll tackle the gay issue specifically.

Why do you think Strange World flopped so horribly around the globe from Mexico to Finland to Brazil, while Inside Out 2 is doing gangbuster business in all of those same countries with the same audiences?

I think it's because most human parents on planet Earth aren't comfortable taking their 8 year old child to a Disney cartoon movie about a gay child. If Disney wants to continue making profitable movies that most Earthlings will take their young children to, they'd be wise to accept that and learn from it.

View attachment 793232

Yes. The undercurrent of this whole debate has been Disneys approach to “progress”

They can be measured and practical…because their business is selling product.

Or they can read a report from an analyst in the board room…decree it…and have people try to smash it into the audience’s faces like a hammer.
Does the world suck? Yes
Does that mean we can’t get there? Absolutely not
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
I think it's because most human parents on planet Earth aren't comfortable taking their 8 year old child to a Disney cartoon movie about a gay child.

Straw man. It's not a movie "about a gay child." There is a teenager that fits that description, though, just like there is in all of your kids' schools/communities.

It's a movie that is both an eco-fable about how powering our lives can have a negative impact on our environment and a movie about accepting our children for being different from how we want them to be. [Note: The 2nd point is not, in fact, about the aforementioned gay child.]
 
Last edited:

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Straw man. It's not a movie "about a gay child." There is a teenager that fits that description, though, just like there is in all of your kids' schools/communities.

It's a movie that is both an eco-fable about how powering our lives can have a negative impact on our environment and a movie about accepting our children for being different from how we want them to be. [Note: The 2nd point is not, in fact, about aforementioned gay child.]

Apparently that wasn't a movie that adults across the globe wanted to take their children to.

I'd forgotten about the "eco-fable" angle, which sounds even cringier than the gay kid, to be honest. Especially when the eco-fable lecture is coming from a global corporation that wastes tons of energy making robots sing and dance for tourists and sends actors to Cannes every year in a fleet of private jets so they can receive teary standing ovations. 🤣

That's a bad business and creative decision on the part of Disney, and a quick way to vaporize about $200 Million in production and marketing costs.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
I do.



But perhaps it would be better if @Casper Gutman could explain to us what exactly "the hate network" that controls the entire planet of movie-going adults and tells them not to see certain Disney movies is exactly.

Because as of now, it's just sort of a great punchline to a joke. I'd love to have it explained to us exactly how the hate network operates on six continents to control global movie consumers and successfully dissuades them from seeing certain Disney movies aimed at family audiences.

Until some sort of evidence is provided for the existence of the hate network, I'm of the belief that those movies flop so badly because most parents on Earth just aren't comfortable or interested in seeing those specific movies.
I originally thought the hate network posts were about YouTube sites like Nerdrotic but now I have no idea either, those sites combined reach a few million people at most, not the billions that it would take to doom a movie worldwide, even throwing in mainstream right sites like FoxNews wouldn’t have a fraction of the reach needed to influence the entire world.

I think we’re in tinfoil hat territory to think there’s an underlying “network” that can influence billions of people globally.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
This can't really be answered on this forum, which you probably know. But feel free to look into the work of something like the ISD and see what you think.

I'm afraid you're going to need to give me a better hint. I have no idea what ISD stands for, and just now when I Googled that acronym all I got was a list of school districts in towns and cities that start with the letter 'I' or that use the word "Independent" in their school district title.

Can you give me another hint?
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
I'd forgotten about the "eco-fable" angle, which sounds even cringier than the gay kid, to be honest. Especially when the eco-fable lecture is coming from a global corporation that wastes tons of energy making robots sing and dance for tourists and sends actors to Cannes every year in a fleet of private jets so they can receive teary standing ovations. 🤣

The eco-fable angle is probably them chasing the audience of kids/adults who really enjoy Studio Ghibli's movies.
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
I'm afraid you're going to need to give me a better hint. I have no idea what ISD stands for, and just now when I Googled that acronym all I got was a list of school districts in towns and cities that start with the letter 'I' or that use the word "Independent" in their school district title.

Can you give me another hint?

Really? It's #3 in the Google results in a private window for me. <Ctrl-F> hate on your search results, or I suppose just add that to your search terms.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
I originally thought the hate network posts were about YouTube sites like Nerdrotic but now I have no idea either, those sites combined reach a few million people at most, not the billions that it would take to doom a movie worldwide, even throwing in mainstream right sites like FoxNews wouldn’t have a fraction of the reach needed to influence the entire world.

I think we’re in tinfoil hat territory to think there’s an underlying “network” that can influence billions of people globally.
I very strongly suspect you are very, very willing to acknowledge the existence of a loose, informal network of ideologically likeminded outlets - mainstream media, YouTube, bloggers, etc - attempting to influence public opinion if we start talking about MSNBC, the New York Times, BBC etc.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
The eco-fable angle is probably them chasing the audience of kids/adults who really enjoy Studio Ghibli's movies.

Oh. Well, it didn't work.

And no wonder, because Disney's entire business model is built on decadent luxury and wasteful use of resources.

There's no good reason why you need giant air conditioned warehouses in a Florida swamp full of singing robots, on a property that encourages the entire audience to either fly across oceans or drive across multiple states to get there. The whole concept of Disney World and Disneyland is wasteful and practically sinful, at least if you really do believe that using more energy than is required for your basic safety and health is bad for the planet.

Just the fleet of Gulfstream jets that Disney maintains at Van Nuys Airport to fly executives and company talent around the globe for business and leisure, just so they don't have to suffer the indignities of First Class commercial air travel with the peasants, undermines the preachy lecture against using energy that is contained in Strange World.

DSC04677-HDR_edited-1024x683.jpg
 
Last edited:

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Really? It's #3 in the Google results in a private window for me. <Ctrl-F> hate on your search results, or I suppose just add that to your search terms.

I played around with the search function, and got Institute for Strategic Dialogue out of London? Is that what you were getting at to look into? I've never heard of them.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
I'm afraid you're going to need to give me a better hint. I have no idea what ISD stands for, and just now when I Googled that acronym all I got was a list of school districts in towns and cities that start with the letter 'I' or that use the word "Independent" in their school district title.

Can you give me another hint?
I had no idea either and did a search and got pages of school districts also, then a bunch of results for investor state disputes 😂, maybe your browser history needs to direct you toward the result, I still have no clue what ISD is. I’m old though so it wouldn’t be the first time I’m out of the loop.
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
Oh. Well, it didn't work.

And no wonder, because Disney's entire business model is built on decadent luxury and wasteful use of resources.

There's no good reason why you need giant air conditioned warehouses in a Florida swamp full of singing robots and dancing ghosts, on a property that encourages the entire audience to either fly across oceans or drive across multiple states to get there. The whole concept of Disney World and Disneyland is wasteful and practically sinful, if you really do believe that using more energy than is required for your basic safety and health is bad for the planet.

Just the fleet of Gulfstream jets that Disney maintains at Van Nuys Airport to fly executives and company talent around the globe for business and leisure, just so they don't have to suffer the indignities of First Class air travel with the peasants, undermines the preachy lecture against using energy that is contained in Strange World.

Who said it was a preachy lecture? That's a pretty specific categorization from someone who hasn't actually seen the movie in question. It's also not about energy consumption writ large, but where that energy comes from. WDW is allegedly 40% powered by solar as of last year, so it's not as if Disney is sleeping on this particular issue.

Private jets (and aviation, in general) are a drop in the bucket of all of the emissions generated in this world, and many of them have been switched to using more efficient fuels over the last 15-20 years. But I suppose you're trying to appeal to our natural "eat the rich" tendencies with this line of critique.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
I had no idea either and did a search and got pages of school districts also, then a bunch of results for investor state disputes 😂, maybe your browser history needs to direct you toward the result, I still have no clue what ISD is. I’m old though so it wouldn’t be the first time I’m out of the loop.

I added the word "hate" to my search right after "ISD", and it popped up on top.

But I was still getting a bunch of school districts too, but this time with topics about "Why do kids hate school?" 🤣
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
Apparently that wasn't a movie that adults across the globe wanted to take their children to.

I'd forgotten about the "eco-fable" angle, which sounds even cringier than the gay kid, to be honest. Especially when the eco-fable lecture is coming from a global corporation that wastes tons of energy making robots sing and dance for tourists and sends actors to Cannes every year in a fleet of private jets so they can receive teary standing ovations. 🤣

That's a bad business and creative decision on the part of Disney, and a quick way to vaporize about $200 Million in production and marketing costs.
Go and ahead and ignore the fact most People did not care for that movie for reasons that had nothing to do with a gay character that consisted of less then 10 minutes of screen time…. But a movie failed cause “ minorities”
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom