• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Disney Irish

Premium Member
That's interesting to me. There is a whole lot of the legacy cast in that trailer.
This is not really a spoiler, but I'll put it in a tag anyways.

But outside of Aykroyd in some additional scenes what you see in the trailer is pretty close to all appearances of the legacy cast.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
For me it was too much melody being a ghost having multiple strokes and xo creations with. They wanted to make a ghost a goon that is redeemed, but it was a messy subplot. Bht that is my preference His choice but Rock Moranis would have been a nuce cameo as Tully at end.

A 4/5 for me and Dan Aykroyd and balance of cast as supporting roles was impressive in it.

If a other adventure with the youngjns getting older I would love to see the four main young cast with more chemistry moments.
Aykroyd was fine for me. But I'll just say....

He really didn't need to be in most of his scenes. Its like he was "in" on what was going to be said by the other characters and could have just said it himself. Like that whole section with Patton Oswalt explaining the orb could have been done by Aykroyd himself.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Aykroyd was fine for me. But I'll just say....

He really didn't need to be in most of his scenes. Its like he was "in" on what was going to be said by the other characters and could have just said it himself. Like that whole section with Patton Oswalt explaining the orb could have been done by Aykroyd himself.
I agree with that. I think it is a continuation of the modern world having more passionate spiritual/conspiracy types like him.
It was probably to make sure that performed had a part in it as he has been a fan and connected to the franchise when he can rather openly.

the Mary Todd Lincoln phonograph bit got.me a good laugh
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
They just think Jesus gives them bonus Heaven Points if they don't go see a cartoon with a gay character in it.

Can you explain that theory in the context of the horrifically bad box office across the world for Strange World, in countries that are majority Buddhist, Hindu or Muslim, or in European countries that are majority non-religious or agnostic?

WWJD.jpg
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Today is the day that Snow White was originally scheduled to be released in theaters, before it was Zegler'ed and got sent back for major rewrites and rework and pushed to a 2025 release

Box Office is out for Thursday, previewing what this weekend will look like without Snow White. The Ghostbusters sequel looks to be the #1 movie this weekend. According to industry sources, it had a rather modest $100 Million budget, so will need around $300 Million globally to break even.

Preview.jpg


 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
Can you explain that theory in the context of the horrifically bad box office across the world for Strange World, in countries that are majority Buddhist, Hindu or Muslim, or in European countries that are majority non-religious or agnostic?

View attachment 774359
People are running with the narrative that Strange World did not do well because it featured gay characters when in reality it just was not a great movie… but people use it as an excuse for their own prejudices
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
Since we've been talking about it here, BOR is projecting that Late Night with the Devil will open at $1.4m.

That would be a huge opening for an IFC film. From what I can see, that's easily the biggest weekend since The Death of Stalin (2018) was at its peak. Before that, you have to go back to Best Picture nominee Boyhood (2014) to find a movie that did significantly better than that at open.

ETA: Immaculate to open at $4.4m. There is definitely still plenty of room in the horror market for The First Omen when it drops in a couple weeks.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
People are running with the narrative that Strange World did not do well because it featured gay characters when in reality it just was not a great movie… but people use it as an excuse for their own prejudices
It wasn't like it was even terrible, or poorly made, it just committed the ultimate movie sin of being boring.
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Since we've been talking about it here, BOR is projecting that Late Night with the Devil will open at $1.4m.

That would be a huge opening for an IFC film. From what I can see, that's easily the biggest weekend since The Death of Stalin (2018) was at its peak. Before that, you have to go back to Best Picture nominee Boyhood (2014) to find a movie that did significantly better than that at open.

ETA: Immaculate to open at $4.4m. There is definitely still plenty of room in the horror market for The First Omen when it drops in a couple weeks.

1.4 is good? Like for just Friday?
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
No, that's the prediction for the whole weekend. That's great for an IFC movie, though -- they don't get a lot of screens typically (I still haven't seen a count for what Late Night is getting) and generally don't have significant ad budgets.
Ok. I didn’t realize it was *that* tiny of a film.
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
Definitely. There were something like 9 or 10 different production cards on the front of the movie. I've never seen anything like that many before, even on a Euro indie. It's like everybody chipped in their $50,000 or whatever to make it happen.
I wonder how wide the film went… It is actually playing at several theaters here this weekend… I was not expecting the film to… as I thought it was a very limited first week… caught me by surprise… saw it… enjoyed it
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
Third times a charm? Looks like no:

"Disney has Pixar’s Luca, which was previously relegated to Disney+, in theaters, but similar to the other Pixar re-releases this year (Turning Red, Soul), there was no muscle behind these in marketing. The Italian-set animated movie did $150K yesterday at 1,390 for what will be a very underwhelming $510K or $367 per theater."

- Deadline


My concern is that Disney will take the wrong lessons from this and think re-releases are not worth it, instead of understanding that these three titles and how they were marketed factored into their lack of success.
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
I wonder how wide the film went… It is actually playing at several theaters here this weekend… I was not expecting the film to… as I thought it was a very limited first week… caught me by surprise… saw it… enjoyed it

Wow. 1034 screens (although I should caveat that it's only been given half screens at my AMCs) -- that's by far the largest IFC opening I can find, and higher than Boyhood or The Death of Stalin at their peaks. I think it's also going to blow by that previous estimate -- sitting at $1.15m after Thu/Fri. Immaculate sitting at $2m, so some of the prospective audience appears to have flipped which movie they went to see.
 
Last edited:

Disney Irish

Premium Member
It shouldn't really get in the way of (m)any important screen times, even on opening day. A live showing would be in the 3:00-7:00 time block on the East Coast.
Yep (actually earlier), opening ceremonies are to start around 7:30pm Paris Time, which would be 1:30pm Eastern/10:30am Pacific. And given a normal ~3 hour run time, will probably be over by 5pm Eastern (maybe 6 at the latest).


So this isn't really going to get into prime evening viewings for any movie opening.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom