Honestly, right???Well I am glad I am free from such rules in my own home
Not as good as I'm Blowing Up Your Head Part 5: Stumpy takes Manhattan.I’m Blowing Up Your Head Part 6: Stumpy’s Revenge
How do you know if Bride of Frankenstein has a lot in common with Poor Things if you refuse to watch it?For me I love a good monster movie or a cheesy B-movie. My favorite of the classic Universal monster movies is the Bride of Frankenstein. It has a lot of things in common with Poor Things. However the entry to watch is far too high for me.
if you want to see How to Blow Up a Pipeline, that is a very good film:I’m Blowing Up Your Head Part 6: Stumpy’s Revenge
And this is part of the reason why The Numbers isn't used by most in the Industry, it doesn't track a lot of rereleases especially internationally.
But I would say give Poor Things a try at some point even with its description, you may find it has more in common with Valley of the Dolls than you think.
I want to ask this in the most respectful way possible… what is your issue with rated R movies?I won't be seeing Poor Things because of the MPAA rating for it, as anything that gets an R rating in 2024 automatically raises a red flag for me.
If you noticed in the article that you yourself just posted, they didn't have wide releases in the US. They were released to 24 Cinemark theaters across 11 states. So they probably didn't do a whole lot of domestic box office.Do you know where we can find the box office data for the eight re-releases that were part of the Disney 100 gimmick?
Unlike Hocus Pocus and Nightmare Before Christmas, I can't find any evidence the eight Disney 100 movies even existed in US theaters in the last half of 2023 after the June press release about it, much less their box office tallies.
8 Fan-Favorite Movies Return to Theaters for Disney's 100th Anniversary: Full Schedule
Disney is commemorating its 100th anniversary with 100 days of movie magic. As part of the year-long Disney100 celebration, eight fan-favorite Disney movies will return to select theaters nationwide for special engagements: Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003), Toy Story...comicbook.com
I want to ask this in the most respectful way possible… what is your issue with rated R movies?
Ahh. Different strokes for different folksI like some of them, at least back in the 20th century. But usually if a movie is rated R nowadays you are going to be subjected to bare bosoms bouncing around, profanity replacing adjectives in regular conversation, and/or blood and guts.
I'm not opposed to warfare or mild violence, as I enjoyed most of the Star Wars movies and some war epics. But the gratuitous sex I find distasteful, and gory violence and blood splattering everywhere just makes my stomach turn.
There's a few exceptions, but that's generally how it pans out for the past 20 years or so. I once was subjected by my nephew about 15 years ago to 10 minutes of a movie called Kill Bill, and it was horrific. Just not my scene at all.
There is no gore, graphic nudity (or any nudity), or disturbing material in Valley Of The Dolls. It is an adult movie, and children shouldn't watch it for its adult themes, but it was not profane or obscene or gory.
I won't be seeing Poor Things because of the MPAA rating for it, as anything that gets an R rating in 2024 automatically raises a red flag for me. Then when the subject matter of Poor Things was further described and explained to me, I knew my instinct was correct to avoid it.
I like some of them, at least back in the 20th century. But usually if a movie is rated R nowadays you are going to be subjected to bare bosoms bouncing around, profanity replacing adjectives in regular conversation, and/or blood and guts.
I'm not opposed to warfare or mild violence, as I enjoyed most of the Star Wars movies and some war epics. But the gratuitous sex I find distasteful, and gory violence and blood splattering everywhere just makes my stomach turn.
There's a few exceptions, but that's generally how it pans out for the past 20 years or so. I once was subjected by my nephew about 15 years ago to 10 minutes of a movie called Kill Bill, and it was horrific. Just not my scene at all.
If you noticed in the article that you yourself just posted, they didn't have wide releases in the US. They were released to 24 Cinemark theaters across 11 states. So they probably didn't do a whole lot of domestic box office.
However some of the international numbers are available on BoxofficeMojo, which is the industry used site and most accurate.
From what I can find here is the following international numbers -
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl - Not reported
Toy Story - $27.5M
Frozen - $62.8M
Beauty and the Beast - Not reported
The Incredibles - $77k
Coco - $151k
The Lion King - Not reported
Moana - $22.1M
All totaling, at least from what is reported, ~$112.6M internationally.
To each their own, but you have missed out on some of the truly great cinematic experiences of the last 30+ years.
Since 2 of the theaters are local to me I can say that yes they were released and did go through with it, I personally didn't go.Oh, so this wasn't a USA thing at all? Did the 24 theaters in the USA actually go through with it? I can't find any evidence they did. The Numbers will track a movie that's only in 2 theaters and released by some church or something that only makes $600 bucks on one Friday night showing. But none of these Disney 100 films showed up at all in box office data.
Something tells me the concept was mostly scrapped, even overseas. Looking at that link, Moana did decent business but was only released in Australia and New Zealand. Frozen did the best at $63 Million, but almost all of it came from South Korea. I take it because it was the sing-along version and I think South Korea invented Karaoke?
So to answer the question posed by @tcool123, no the re-release of Soul in 1,350 theaters is not going to be able to be compared/contrasted against the Disney 100 re-releases. That Disney 100 thing was something that seemingly was abandoned by Burbank domestically, or purposely relegated only to a handful of foreign countries who had wildly varying box office reactions to the films that were actually released.
At this point, the re-release of Soul is most unflatteringly compared/contrasted to the re-releases in 2023 of Hocus Pocus and Nightmare Before Christmas;
Hocus Pocus = $4.9 Million from 1,375 theaters
Nightmare Before Christmas = $10.2 Million from 1,650 theaters
Soul = $600,000 (and counting) from 1,350 theaters
No one claimed its wrong to not have watch them, nor is there any arguing over it. As I said to each their own.Yes, I'm sure. But I have really enjoyed the truly great cinematic experiences I have seen, and look forward to whatever I might choose to see in 2024 and beyond.
This is like arguing which is better, pizza or cheeseburgers. Both are great, but liking one more than the other isn't wrong.
As for why they aren't being reported I have no idea.
No one claimed its wrong to not have watch them, nor is there any arguing over it. As I said to each their own.
As I mentioned 2 of the theaters are local to me. I personally can say they were released as I have gone to both theaters during that time.Truly a mystery. If these movies did play in the 24 different US theaters that were announced in June, they weren't reported by any box office tracking website. How every odd.
Something tells me some of these Disney 100 re-released movies announced in June didn't actually appear in US theaters, even 24 of them, by September or October. And overseas they only showed in select countries, with varying results (Frozen re-release got $27,000 in the Netherlands, then disappeared...)
No wonder no one had mentioned this until @tcool123 brought it up. If you aren't Dutch, you didn't know it was happening.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.