Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

DKampy

Well-Known Member
People should stop claiming to speak for “everyone.”

Maybe just say, “I don’t want to see the film,” instead of the unsubstantiated, “No one wants to see the film.” Plenty of films would kill for a $47m opening. No matter the context, that’s not “no one.”

There may be fewer people in the MCU fandom drawn to a film with 3 female or minority leads. That’s sad, but real. So do you never make that film?

Sometimes you have to break new ground. Will & Grace didn’t come about after gay people were widely treated as equals; they paved the way by showing the characters to mainstream America in a non-threatening way. (Of course, they were all white, so maybe that was easier?)

The kids watching The Marvels today will have no trouble supporting a billion dollar blockbuster with a female Pakistani lead when they are adults with their own kids.
It is rather sad… I feel we have gone backwards since a certain event took place in the USA… I feel as if a Movie like Bros would have done better 10 years ago… most did not see it base on their own issues… which is a shame because it is rather fantastic
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Others have been hitting more than Disney comparatively. They also seem to have a bit more control over their budgets, which helps.
As I just posted, the entire Hollywood studio machine needs to find a way to reign in budgets, not just Disney.

Other studios have the same problems with budgets as Disney does, so don't fall into the trap of thinking its only Disney.

A little late on the adjustment...if there even is one...
It might be too late for 2023, but its not too late to adjust for the future. If you think that Disney is just going to fade out of the movie business you're naive. For a company as large as Disney they can suffer losses like they have in 2023 and still continue to function and move forward.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Its a larger trend in Hollywood, big budgets to chase the big box office. I go back to Scorsese, he spent basically blockbuster money for what amounts to almost a documentary and got no box office for it.

The entire Hollywood studio machine needs to find a way to reign in budgets, not just Disney.
TOTALLY AGREE! Still good advise for Disney.

But Disney as well as the other movie studios will just keep spending and losing.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I suppose you can continually ask for clarification, but if someone is thinking something that would violate forum rules to say out loud, you're probably never going to get it. I would count that as a good thing and move on. Why people post with no intent to actually discuss is a mystery to me but there are some things you just can't fix.
I’ll be by later to take the next shift watching the gate 👍🏻 🏰
 

Andrew C

You know what's funny?
There may be fewer people in the MCU fandom drawn to a film with 3 female or minority leads. That’s sad, but real. So do you never make that film?
If they wanted to make a "statement" film, they should have probably done it with a lower budget.
The kids watching The Marvels today will have no trouble supporting a billion dollar blockbuster with a female Pakistani lead when they are adults with their own kids.
Unless that blockbuster is in fact not a blockbuster and somewhat garbage.
Will & Grace didn’t come about after gay people were widely treated as equals
Good show.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
The kids watching The Marvels today will have no trouble supporting a billion dollar blockbuster with a female Pakistani lead when they are adults with their own kids.

There were very few Gen Z kids of either gender who went to see The Marvels. The 18-24 demographic collapsed by more than half for The Marvels compared to Captain Marvel a few years ago, both boys and girls.

Which is the problem; almost no one wanted to see this movie. Not Black women, not white women who work in HR, not the 600,000 people of Pakistani descent living in the USA, not Marvel fans, not teenage boys, not teenage girls. Almost no one.

 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Of course its good advice for Disney.

And yes just like they have for 100 years, they will continue to spend and lose, and spend and profit, and so on. Its a cycle that keeps going.....
That would be interesting data to look at all the movies TWDC released of the 100 years, and how much they made or lost.

Too bad, that data is not available to the public.

Even today, we have no idea how much a given move really cost to make and market, how much a given movie went over budget etc.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
That would be interesting data to look at all the movies TWDC released of the 100 years, and how much they made or lost.

Too bad, that data is not available to the public.

Even today, we have no idea how much a given move really cost to make and market, how much a given movie went over budget etc.
We know that some classics like Pinocchio and Fantasia and others were major "flops" when released. And we know that some years in the 70s and 80s were less than profitable.

But yeah it would be interesting to see over its history of the profit/loss of Studios. I think the outcome might surprise many here.

And I agree, and have said many times, we never really know the real costs of anything, nor do we know the real splits either. Its all part of that fuzzy Hollywood math that has been around for almost 100 years itself.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
Checking in on the global audiences and their reaction to this film.

Wiki: Pakistanis are the second largest national group in the UAE after Indians, constituting 12.5% of the country's total population.

UAE opening weekend: $694K, down about 50% from Guardians 3.


The search for the global audience that resonated with this film continues...
Can we please drop the absurd idea that only Pakistani movie-goers are capable of relating to a character of Pakistani heritage?
 

Wendy Pleakley

Well-Known Member
I saw it, its a great film and I expect it to win some awards.

But it still cost $200M (with no VFX) to make, plus $100M to market (using everyone's favorite guesstimate number), and that is a huge loss for a filmmaker that is usually pretty solid at the box office. Hmm, sound familiar.... ;)

I wonder what Apple expected from that movie.

They seem to be focused on their streaming service.

Were they expecting the movie to turn a profit theatrically, or was it just for awards purposes? Is any theatrical revenue merely a bonus on top of what they get from subscriber income?

This could be part of that shift people are mentioning, where theatrical box office isn't the be all and end all.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Not that the discussion of mega-flop The Marvels isn't fun, but Box Office Pro just updated its box office forecast for Wish.

Wish gets the plum and highly enviable Thanksgiving weekend debut. And it had a lavish $200 Million production budget and has a carpet-bombing marketing campaign that must have cost $100 Million or so. So it would need roughly $600 Million at the global box office to break even. And yet it's total domestic box office forecast ranges from $165 to $289 Million.

At the high end of $289 domestically, it might break even if the overseas box office is stronger than the USA. But at the low end of only $165 domestically, even a very strong overseas box office wouldn't get it to break even. If the overseas is similarly weak to the domestic box office of $165, Wish could lose $100 Million or more at the box office.

Wish is not a movie that seems to be ready to leap out of the gate next week towards a $750+ Million box office tally.

A4.jpg

A3.jpg

 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Agreed, TWDC is not the only company making movies that lose money.
Nor is that new.
For producing flop after flop, you don't think they should be embarrassed. If you were that bad at your job, would you be embarrassed?
They’re not bad at their job. They overestimated their audience (which has morphed over the last several years while these movies were being made.) If TLM was an objectively bad movie, I’d agree with you. It wasn’t, but it was treated like one. That’s not a problem with the product.
If they wanted to make a "statement" film, they should have probably done it with a lower budget.
I think it’s more complicated than that.

Marvel films were doing well. Black Panther did well. Why wouldn’t TLM or The Marvels or a different take on Snow White do well? These films were attacked long before they came out. That obviously has zero to do with film quality.

Also: you’ve made all these big budget Marvel films. Now the one focused on women should be low budget?

Again, they had misplaced faith in their audience - an audience being actively turned against Disney by politicians and groups.
Even today, we have no idea how much a given move really cost to make and market, how much a given movie went over budget etc.
Why would we other than a curiosity?

You’re just a fan. Your job is do I like this or not? That’s all. How much it cost to make has zero to do with that. How well it does at the box office has zero to do with that.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
We know that some classics like Pinocchio and Fantasia and others were major "flops" when released. And we know that some years in the 70s and 80s were less than profitable.

But yeah it would be interesting to see over its history of the profit/loss of Studios. I think the outcome might surprise many here.

And I agree, and have said many times, we never really know the real costs of anything, nor do we know the real splits either. Its all part of that fuzzy Hollywood math that has been around for almost 100 years itself.
I knew Fantasia lost money, although there are stories that folks like to watch it while high :)

I did not know about Pinocchio, but I think Pinocchio was the most expensive to make at that time.

See, the same rules applied back then. DON'T OVER SPEND WHEN MAKING MOVIES
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
People should stop claiming to speak for “everyone.”

They aren't speaking for everyone. The box office is speaking on behalf of "everyone"

Maybe just say, “I don’t want to see the film,” instead of the unsubstantiated, “No one wants to see the film.” Plenty of films would kill for a $47m opening. No matter the context, that’s not “no one.”

You can keep your head in the sand - but 47m in sales represents a FRACTION of the number of people they were expecting, and a fraction of the number of people that previously were going to see these films.

Sometimes you have to break new ground. Will & Grace didn’t come about after gay people were widely treated as equals; they paved the way by showing the characters to mainstream America in a non-threatening way. (Of course, they were all white, so maybe that was easier?)

A nice thought... if The Marvels were the first of it's type and somehow a miss compared to a streak of something not misses. Meanwhile, Disney is on a huge streak of misses, across multiple film types. Is every one of these films 'breaking new ground' and your suggesting the misses are just casualties of being too early for something?

How much do you think Disney has in the tank to keep being culturally 'too early' while burning up billions
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom