And futurama ride. Though I don't think fox owns futurama anymore. Doesn't comedy central own the rights now?If we get a Bender, Zoidberg and Leela meet and greet in Tomorrowland, it'll all be worth it.
a market is the combined behavior of thousands of people responding to information, misinformation, and whim
And futurama ride. Though I don't think fox owns futurama anymore. Doesn't comedy central own the rights now?
I was on my morning walk this morning and was listening to Fox Business. They claim Comcast is not going to bid against Disney for Fox but are interested in getting some of the assets, specifically the Fox RSNs and didn't say but it is well known they want Sky. After my walk I read that Comcast will be making its formal proposal to buy Sky at a value of 31 billion. Now that makes no sense because it is only 16% higher than Fox's proposed bid which the UK board is determining if it will have to be a 36% higher since Disney increased their Fox offer by that much. In any case, thanks to Comcast, Sky will cost Disney around 35 billion and unless Disney is willing to let it go for that Comcast will have to pay more.
Getting back to the RSNs, Disney should listen to any offer Comcast is willing to make but should be sure that all stockholders get full value. I still think spinning off the RSNs is the best thing for shareholders. Selling to Comcast must bring in a minimum of 20 billion plus a new deal on the Marvel movie and themepark rights. Disney should not offer Comcast any lost cost deal because I think the market cap of a spin off RSN company would be between 20 and 25 billion.
That makes no sense. Why would Comcast try and find buyers for the RSNs? If they found one willing to pay a ton of money wouldn't they pay the same amount to Disney? Or is there an illegal behind the scenes agreement to just increase the rates Comcast customers will pay for the channels?I was really hoping this was dead: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/finance/o...yers-for-fox-sports-assets-sources/ar-AAzNX3d
I think Comcast just wants to keep Disney from getting larger. Disney will have the OTP services so they will no longer be dependent on Comcast for distribution. At the same time with the new cable channels Comcast will be much more dependent on Disney for content. In fact it is scary for cable companies that cable tv is no longer a necessity and that 5G will end the cable monopoly on high speed internet. Something I have been talking about here for several years and is about to become a reality for consumers. I strongly believe Comcast is making a big mistake in trying for content when they should be going all in on 5G service nationwide.Originally I was wondering if this comcast and mouse chase was really about Comcast acquiring SKY and that they would continually threaten the overall Fox deal for Disney to get Iger to give up SKY.
The more I think about it, I don't understand even why Comcast is pushing so hard for SKY, let alone the rest of the Fox assets. They could open their checkbook to John Malone and pick up Liberty Global if they wanted European distribution assets. Pick up Endemol Shine for more internationally recognized branded content. The only thing that really makes sense here is making Iger overpay.
That makes no sense. Why would Comcast try and find buyers for the RSNs? If they found one willing to pay a ton of money wouldn't they pay the same amount to Disney? Or is there an illegal behind the scenes agreement to just increase the rates Comcast customers will pay for the channels?
Comcast needs to increase their offer to over 90 billion if they want Fox. The problem with that is the UK merger rules. If they buy Fox for 90 billion that is 80% higher than what Disney originally offered. As a result of that bid, they would have to offer yo buy the rest of Sky at the same price. In other words they would need to offer about 35 billion for the remaining 61% of Sky. That is 4 billion more than they valued the entire company at. Then there is the assumed debt of both Sky and Fox.To me this is a hint about how much more Comcast is willing to bid..... to reassure Wall Street that an increased bid will not be too much debt. If they can get rid of the RSN's, then they can increase their bid at the value of those RSN's and (in their mind) be at the same place they are now. It's an effort to keep their stock price from dropping into the mid to high 20's.
Of the 22 RSN's, there is a reasonable argument Comcast could keep 8 of them which have no overlap to their current holdings. Do you sell them off 1 at a time, in small clusters, or in one big bundle. Personally, I like the idea of an IPO with the funds going to reduce debt over time.
With 5G investments coming (next gen of wireless), they (Comcast) are going to need capital to invest in the future of their network. I believe Comcast will be selling more than just the RSN's, and at the end of all of this, Disney will be in a better place to get their Marvel IP (controlled by Comcast) under their roof.
What a joke. Hulu still loses money and is not worth more than about 8 billion total so he is complaining about 2.4 billion out of a total transaction cost of 84 to 85 billion. This will be tossed in a day or two.Fox Shareholder Sues to Stop Disney Acquisition
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/fox-shareholder-sues-stop-disney-acquisition-1125698
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.