ACE
New Member
speck76 said:If a 14 year old can not maintain themselves on the forums, perhaps there should be a minimum age limit.
Yeah, like 30. Oh wait, you wouldn't be old enough then. Well maybe next year. :lol:
:wave: ACE
speck76 said:If a 14 year old can not maintain themselves on the forums, perhaps there should be a minimum age limit.
AEfx said:I do and have.
As I specifically said above, I know nothing about him but that post. It's irrelevant. You obviously have some problem with him. I have no preconcieved notions about him. I'm not going to speculate what the issue is. He simply said something that I've heard a lot and felt before. There was a time where I didn't want to post here because of some of the things that are posted. Maybe it was justified in his case. Maybe not. Maybe he DOES have an "axe to grind" or falls under one of the other "excuse" examples. It's irrelevant because his posting history and my lack of knowledge of it doesn't invalidate the things I observe on these boards myself.
AEfx said:EXACTLY MY POINT.
Where am I mistaken? It's not about premium vs. non-premium. It never was. Some people have seemed to try to say this in the past that was about the most minor point I have made in this thread and you have made a huge deal about it - detracting from the actual issue.
I can tell you exactly where this came from - because under the old rep system one of the benefits of paid vs. non was that you could see who left you rep. Some people took advantage of this and gave negative rep with abusive comments because people weren't premium members and they felt they wouldn't be held accountable since the non-paying member couldn't see who left it. It was a way to leave a snide comment for someone without exposing yourself in a thread. When things like that were mentioned, people said "Oh no, you are full of it - you're just jealous!" and so it began.
You are SO right in what you say in the last quote above. Some people behave right, some people don't. In this thread I have simply shared some observations that I have about some of the people that don't. I have never started a thread about this topic, and I won't. But this thread has been going for a few days and I felt the need to contribute my opinion. Perhaps that was a mistake. If you are implying that I am behaving badly by doing so, I guess you feel I should keep my opinion to myself if I see things differently than you. If that's the case...I just don't agree. Why is it not okay for me to percieve some of the posts here differently than you? Why do you protest so much when I say it's not cool to tell people things like what they post is stupid?
AEfx
brich said:....
Running right along side a discussion on underwear contents and weapons of choice. :
Pumbas Nakasak said::lookaroun
arent they one and the same thing :drevil:
objr said:Umm...no...I don't think you understand where he is coming from...
I have no problems with NowInc...why you would say that, is beyond me...but anyways....
objr said:First, you say it's not about PM and nonPM then you turn around and go back to one of the arguments made about PMs way back when...what's the point of that? Seems like a contradiction to me...
objr said:Like I said before, I respect your opinion, I just don't agree.
objr said:My problem is ONLY with the way you have presented your opinion, because the newer members will come in here and read all this trash (every post from start to finish) and get the wrong impression of things...
objr said:Everyone has an opinion...and I'll be the first to say yours is as valid as mine...
TAC said:I think underwear contents would be considered a weapon of opportunity.
How about Wepons of Mass Distruction :lookarounPumbas Nakasak said:Does that include bio chemical weapons?
How about Weapons of Mass Reproduction... :lookarounAurora_25 said:How about Wepons of Mass Distruction :lookaroun
diddy_mouse said:the sprinkles of underware discussions added a nice bit of flavor.
objr said:I've said all that I needed to say about this issue AEfx....people know where I stand...
objr said:An attack of wdwmagic.com is a personal attack...maybe it shouldn't be that way but thats how I take it...and I'm not the only one...
objr said:But take it up with the very person you have a problem with (this is another problem I had with this thread) people should know when they are being accussed of something...PM them address your concerns with them...maybe there is a misunderstanding...if all else fails Report them...
objr said:Just don't stand behind the anonymity of the internet and scream foul.
yellowstoner said:Who here thinks that objr and AEfx should get a room?
:wave:
yellowstoner said:Who here thinks that objr and AEfx should get a room?
:wave:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:yellowstoner said:Who here thinks that objr and AEfx should get a room?
:wave:
Pumbas Nakasak said:Me, I just post crap, spell badly, start arguments and hopefuly rattle a few pompus windbags. Oh and Im old with a cynical attitude :dazzle: too.
speck76 said:debate: To engage in a formal discussion of opposing viewpoints
argue: To engage in a quarrel; dispute.
If a 14 year old can not maintain themselves on the forums, perhaps there should be a minimum age limit.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.