DHS Soundstage 1 Renovation - Toy Storia Mania expansion

SirLink

Well-Known Member
Im pretty sure the funds for this and Star Wars were approved by the board 6 months ago when Tom Staggs and Iger took them on a tour of Cars Land at DCA:

pic14.jpg

pic21.jpg

Let us not assume anything especially in regard to funding for a specific section of two parks.
 

flyerjab

Well-Known Member
So I am unfamiliar with the DL DCA redo after the first failed attempt at that park. When Anaheim decided to open the checkbook for that park, how was it handled from an advertising standpoint? Was there a big official announcement for DCA 2.0? Was it like, "hey we got it wrong first time around so please give us a second chance!" Just curious as to how they handled that and if people expect this to be done in a similar manner or if it will be different. Also, will that responsibility of selling this to the public be handled by Burbank or TDO?
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
So I am unfamiliar with the DL DCA redo after the first failed attempt at that park. When Anaheim decided to open the checkbook for that park, how was it handled from an advertising standpoint? Was there a big official announcement for DCA 2.0?

No - it was leaked by Micechat and while things were announced, it was more about Disney PR. The DCA redo was in part local politics about the resort district and development Disney didn't want to happen. It was laid out as a long term plan to be done in chunks. D23 and the Bluesky Cellar were big avenues for fans to see what was coming, details, etc.

Was it like, "hey we got it wrong first time around so please give us a second chance!" Just curious as to how they handled that and if people expect this to be done in a similar manner or if it will be different

Just like everything else... 'we have a brand new re-imagined experience for you!' - the company didn't need to say 'its under performing, so here's a reboot' - everyone already knew it. It was a old song by that point and the company just promoted what new and great things were coming. It's PR man.. its all about the positive.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
No - it was leaked by Micechat and while things were announced, it was more about Disney PR. The DCA redo was in part local politics about the resort district and development Disney didn't want to happen. It was laid out as a long term plan to be done in chunks. D23 and the Bluesky Cellar were big avenues for fans to see what was coming, details, etc.



Just like everything else... 'we have a brand new re-imagined experience for you!' - the company didn't need to say 'its under performing, so here's a reboot' - everyone already knew it. It was a old song by that point and the company just promoted what new and great things were coming. It's PR man.. its all about the positive.
And why dwell in the past when you have fantastic, new attractions?
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
No - it was leaked by Micechat and while things were announced, it was more about Disney PR. The DCA redo was in part local politics about the resort district and development Disney didn't want to happen. It was laid out as a long term plan to be done in chunks. D23 and the Bluesky Cellar were big avenues for fans to see what was coming, details, etc.



Just like everything else... 'we have a brand new re-imagined experience for you!' - the company didn't need to say 'its under performing, so here's a reboot' - everyone already knew it. It was a old song by that point and the company just promoted what new and great things were coming. It's PR man.. its all about the positive.
At the 2011 expo Lasseter did say that the park wasn't up to Disney standards.
 

Captain Neo

Well-Known Member
So I am unfamiliar with the DL DCA redo after the first failed attempt at that park. When Anaheim decided to open the checkbook for that park, how was it handled from an advertising standpoint? Was there a big official announcement for DCA 2.0? Was it like, "hey we got it wrong first time around so please give us a second chance!" Just curious as to how they handled that and if people expect this to be done in a similar manner or if it will be different. Also, will that responsibility of selling this to the public be handled by Burbank or TDO?

It was a huge announcement. It was all over the news and Wall Street Journal. Jay Rasolu got out and tried to do damage control by selling it as "an evolution rather than a revolution." and compared it to the Disneyland expansion of the 1960s (although IMO its nowhere near that scope). A preview center was opened in the park and each phase got its own advertising.

I'm not sure they will do the same thing for MGM since that park never had a reputation as being a garbage park. I'm thinking a vague rebranding announcement and then slowly announcing stuff as they begin construction
 

SirLink

Well-Known Member
Hang about people have been saying that the B tickets that come with a Toy Story Playland will give more stuff for kids to do ... news flash two of the flat rides have height restrictions.
 

HolleBolleGijs

Well-Known Member
Hang about people have been saying that the B tickets that come with a Toy Story Playland will give more stuff for kids to do ... news flash two of the flat rides have height restrictions.

That's what I was thinking. I've not yet ridden any of the Paris playland rides, but they're definitely not all kid-friendly. Especially for kids (and adults for that matter) who are afraid of heights, even if they are tall enough.
 
Last edited:

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
Nothing shocking there when it's a safe thing to say since the company had already committed to redoing it. By that point it was ok to call the baby ugly. Not like Gurr and others who openly panned it when it was new.
Agreed, it's definitely different. It is why I found it someone entertaining when Meg Crofton's letter regarding the GAC explicitly mentioned guest abuse. I would have expected, "we constantly re-evaluate, blah blah blah"
 

Cosmic Commando

Well-Known Member
Agreed, it's definitely different. It is why I found it someone entertaining when Meg Crofton's letter regarding the GAC explicitly mentioned guest abuse. I would have expected, "we constantly re-evaluate, blah blah blah"
Like when they straight-up fired the guy who screwed up the Aulani sales instead of him "resigning to spend more time with his family"... when Disney is frank, you know it's REALLY bad.
 

Mouse_Trap

Well-Known Member
I'm really surprised at the number of people here who seems to think a Toy Story Playland would be an acceptable development.

This is Disney, surely some basic and lightly themed, low capacity carnival rides should not be acceptable?

For info, the Playland people are calling for from the Paris Studio features just 3 rides, 2 of which have height restrictions (81 and 120cm).

If this is what is added to DHS, I for one will be extremely disappointed.
 

jdmdisney99

Well-Known Member
I'm really surprised at the number of people here who seems to think a Toy Story Playland would be an acceptable development.

This is Disney, surely some basic and lightly themed, low capacity carnival rides should not be acceptable?

For info, the Playland people are calling for from the Paris Studio features just 3 rides, 2 of which have height restrictions (81 and 120cm).

If this is what is added to DHS, I for one will be extremely disappointed.
Normally, I would agree, but I think we're at the point where adding anything to the area that includes some family rides would be good.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom