Andrew C
You know what's funny?
My understanding is that they had to sacrifice both the M&G's and Pixie Hollow to pay for the mine ride.
sounds like a good trade to me.
My understanding is that they had to sacrifice both the M&G's and Pixie Hollow to pay for the mine ride.
My understanding is that they had to sacrifice both the M&G's and Pixie Hollow to pay for the mine ride.
sounds like a good trade to me.
Mine Ride for the M&G yes, but I would have also liked Pixie Hollow to have stayed. We really wouldn't have lost much of value from Story Book Circus and it would have added an additional ride to the land.
What ride was to be included with Pixie Hollow?Mine Ride for the M&G yes, but I would have also liked Pixie Hollow to have stayed. We really wouldn't have lost much of value from Story Book Circus and it would have added an additional ride to the land.
What ride was to be included with Pixie Hollow?
It feels (to me) and was, cheap. The only reason for its existence at all was as a cost saving alternative to their other plans (Pixie Hollow, etc.). Recycle the tents, light overlay on Barnstormer, a (ugh) water play area....
I'll agree that the added spinner is a capacity boost, but it's at the expense of its former iconic location and was done in part as a test case for the NextGen queue system.
Yawn.
You're right, even a small ride like this would be better than the tents.
Pretty much.
Sounds like "Kang and Kodo's Twirl n' Hurl"Pretty much.
It was called "Bobble and Clank's Whirl and Twirl."
It's a small town....Sounds like "Kang and Kodo's Twirl n' Hurl"
Thank you!Here is an earlier version of the Fantasyland plan with Dumbo on the other side of the Storybook circus area.
View attachment 117995
ehh. That picture does it no justice. We are going to have to agree to disagree. I have listed the reason I like and what they did specifically that I have not like. Danlb_2000, that was a great post of the girl centric and cheaper version of new Fantasyland 1.0 before Tom Staggs came in and changed it to what we now have. In doing so he admitted to share holders there was a "slight increase" in cost.That's what I was thinking.
Doesn't scream world class themed entertainment to me.
ehh. That picture does it no justice. We are going to have to agree to disagree. I have listed the reason I like and what they did specifically that I have not like. Danlb_2000, that was a great post of the girl centric and cheaper version of new Fantasyland 1.0 before Tom Staggs came in and changed it to what we now have. In doing so he admitted to share holders there was a "slight increase" in cost.
I can take a picture like the above of many parts of a Disney theme park that does not scream world class theme park. Not going to do so as its a moot point. Storybook Circus is well done. I expect Toy Story Land to be on the same level. I expect Star Wars land to be higher.
oh true that! I was just commenting on the picture, not trying to paint you in one corner or the other. Apologies.Disclaimer: The use of my name in this post in no way indicates that I endorse the views and opinions of the poster.
I think Storybook Circus is mediocre overall but I agree that the Dumbo capacity increase and the improvements to its appearance were huge and very much needed.Oh we have both been to the same Storybook Circus. I said Storybook Circus does not come across as done on the cheap and I stand by that. It takes you to a romanticized version of a circus that previously only existed in movies and dreams. It is loaded with details big and small. The Dueling Dumbos are beautiful and add a kinetic energy. It is not a e-ticket nor does it have one, but it was not meant to be. It was meant to address a capacity issue they had for decades with the Dumbo. It was not meant to inspire a new population to buy a ticket into the Magic Kingdom, it was meant to add to the value of the day they are already enjoying inside the park. On this scale, Storybook Circus exceeds Mickey's Toontown fair, which did feel cheap and inconsistent. And they spent 10s of millions of dollars to do that, address a capacity issue with Dumbo and greatly improve the aesthetics of this corner of the Park.
I do agree with the idea that Goofini should go. I would like to see a Casey Jr. theme version of Maters Junkyard Jamboree in its place. Goofini is obsolete as family coaster experience compared to 7 Dwarfs Mine Train and is poorly themed compared to the rest of the area. Maters ride system has yet to make its debut at WDW. Replace the tractors with little Casey Jr.'s, and have the guests sit in the little yellow tenders that swing left and right as the trains chug around each other to Casey's theme song or others from the Dumbo Soundtrack.
I remember Tony Baxter talking about how he should have pushed for a the limited Tomorrowland 98 budget to be spent on one great attraction, rather than spread thin. Perhaps New Fantasyland would've been better off with an e-ticket version of Ariel or Mine Train, rather than both?
Re Toy Story Land, it looks like the purpose of the place is to add kid-friendly rides to DHS, in which case it'll probably serve it's purpose well (and permits more of the DHS budget to go to the marquee Star Wars attractions).
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.