Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
Disagree...That's so not true. IP isn't the problem, but rather the correct or incorrect application of said IP is.
The inclusion or lack of IP makes a park absolutely no more or less unique. EPCOT's claim to fame shouldn't SIMPLY be the 'park withour characters'
If IP is executed properly then it is inconsequential to storytelling on a broad scale, or at least not detrimental to it. The way to make each park stand on its own is thematic and nor based on amount of previously existing franchise.
I've not been to Tokyo but I have been to California, and no it doesn't 'blow WDW out of the water' at all. In quality it's mostly comparable just on a smaller scale, although DL is... more filled with attractions than MK.
People are way too hard on WDW. I had massive expectations for DL and somehow it fulfilled all of them because it was the great... but if I had to chose one, I still think WDW is superior if not only based upon scale and diversity of park line up. DL is fantastic but I found DCA to be surprising weak - and it felt tiny in, honestly, kind of a bad way.
And Disneyland is superior for the simple fact they haven’t abandoned/limited the patrons ceiling for how much they can do in one day.
Wdw is still woefully behind on the amount of capacity on its attractions - which is the point of going there. It’s now bogged down in a reservation system that drives upsells.
I’m ok with IP. But instead of taking 4 years to build ratatouille(l (a clone...by the way)...build 3 good IP rides in 5 years