http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=&e=2&u=/ap/20040304/ap_on_bi_ge/disney_shareholders
. . . .MITCHELL???!!!
:fork:
. . . .MITCHELL???!!!
:fork:
Originally posted by tigsmom
Now that would be cruel........to Evelyn. :lol:
I think we will see more changes by the end of the year.
Originally posted by Wilt Dasney
I think you're right...Roy and Stan will keep pounding away at current management until we see substantive changes. Based on what I heard from the meeting today, lots of folks are on their side.
And I've had it before, and this will go away, I believe.
Originally posted by SpaceRacer2003
Did they miss the fact we didn't vote for Mitchell either:fork: , what was it something like a 20% no confidence vote for him?
Great way to start a new gig.
:fork:
Originally posted by SirGoofy
:veryconfu Is the board really this dumb? I could have made a better choice than this. The only explination I can think of is that they are trying to think of a plan for the future.
Originally posted by CTXRover
Come on guys...one thing at a time. There is absolutely no succession plan set at Disney...that is a major problem on its own. But as a result, you can't expect Eisner to step down tomorrow without having some dire consequences for the whole company. Finding the right guy or gal to fill this position needs to be done right or someone even worse could take the position. Since the board has been adamant up to this point with their support for Eisner and his direction, Disney has not seriously talked with anyone about taking over the leadership of the company. Things like this don't happen overnight, much less in 5 hours.
Roy and Stanley were also demanding these two positions be split. Round 1 of their campaign is now complete. You must also realize that some of the Institutional Investor groups who voted No have said they were not necessarily voting no to get Eisner removed as Roy and Stanley want, rather they voted No since they believed that the company would be better if the CEO and chairman positions were two separate entities and Eisner was no longer head of both. And the board has responded to that request rather quickly. Give it time people. Look how far things have come in a short span of time since Roy's campaign started. Is George Mitchell the right guy in the long run or does this split with him at the head really change much? No, but there are few people that could step into it so quickly....so this will have to do for now.
Let's be realistic on how fast things can happen. If they had a true succession plan or even were working on one, things could go differently and much more quickly, but they don't.
Originally posted by Woody13
Well said. I agree with you, except for one point. The Board does have a succession plan:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.