HippieCrane
Member
If this is true, this has got to be the dumbest thing the disney company has done since removing america sings! I will GLASS the ENTIRE planet if they TOUCH my bears!!!
If this is true, this has got to be the dumbest thing the disney company has done since removing america sings! I will GLASS the ENTIRE planet if they TOUCH my bears!!!
The parks score was lower when SGE was in operation. Close an attraction and improve guest satisfaction? Seems like a good deal for TDO. It would be nice for something to go into its spot though.SGE should still be replaced. I don’t know how they are OK with leaving a useless building on stage. That’s like Target selling out of appliances, deciding not to carry them anymore, and just leaving the empty shelves there.
Why? What do Woody and Jessie have to do with Splash Mountain? If they are going to build a lame puppet theater for Woody and Jesse, shouldn't they build it in Toy Story Land? Perhaps in one on the buildings they cut from the original plan?They should build a Toy Story Puppet theater at the exit of Splash Mountain when Woody and Jessie Meet and Greet. Disney used to be about "plus-ing" things not "subtracting" them
Why? What do Woody and Jessie have to do with Splash Mountain? If they are going to build a lame puppet theater for Woody and Jesse, shouldn't they build it in Toy Story Land? Perhaps in one on the buildings they cut from the original plan?
Rather than displacing an original attraction and creating a more thematic mess.
two originals at once, which makes this even worse, if true.
Why can’t Disney put it in Toy Story Land at Hollywood Studios?! Common sense
They're not interested in compromise. They're interested in euthanizing bears.Could the addition of food service be the best way forward for both Tiki and CBJ? I think it's a reasonable compromise if the only alternative is losing the attractions.
They're not interested in compromise. They're interested in euthanizing bears.
Because then they would be building a new attraction which increases operating costs. By replacing something existing with something they think will draw more crowds they increase capacity without increases cost.
That's one way to open with an attraction...If this is tied with Tiki as is speculated... where will the birds go? Brazil?
What about the Tiki motifs, like the Tiki Garden, around the Birds? Where will those go?
D23 is in California, thankfully. They didn’t particularly care for CBJ.
It's. Widespread. Because. There. Is. Truth. Behind. It.
My God, if you don't want to read rumors and they bother you THIS MUCH, then PLEASE go explore the other sections of this site. Nearly every single thing you post is some variation of the same thing. It's exhausting.
I think I'm finally just going to use the ignore function for the first time in my nearly 20 years here because I truly don't think I can deal with your posts any more.
For the record, this is the only WDW site that I'm a member of. Nice assumption, though. Like literally 80% of your ridiculous posts.
If relocation is actually on the table, which I doubt, Polynesian Resort would make sense. The bears could go to Fort Wilderness. I would begrudgingly accept that as an alternative.If this is tied with Tiki as is speculated... where will the birds go? Brazil?
But seriously, how much truth is there in this rumor? From the first 30 pages no one seems to want to answer me to how concerned we really should be and how far this is, unless I missed it, which is totally possible! I still have another 6 pages to go ...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.