News Cost Cutting Measures Coming Early 2025

larryz

I'm Just A Tourist!
Premium Member
Then again, Indy is an IP, and IPs have synergy and sell merch. Dinosaur has no ip. If dinosaur survives Indy somehow, NO WAY it is forever.
Uh, did you miss this bomb?
1737321270543.jpeg
 

JD80

Well-Known Member
I feel like some of the people that are complaining about "budget cuts" etc. have never actually worked on a complex project before. It happens all the time at every level of the project which include increasing budgets, changing goals etc.
 

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
I feel like some of the people that are complaining about "budget cuts" etc. have never actually worked on a complex project before. It happens all the time at every level of the project which include increasing budgets, changing goals etc.
That's fine but then don't announce all these things before hand. Be like every other park and only announce new attractions well into the construction phase. End the D23 expos
 

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
That's fine but then don't announce all these things before hand. Be like every other park and only announce new attractions well into the construction phase. End the D23 expos
If they want the D23 expos that’s fine, but enough with showing things that aren’t in progress. The more they do that and things get cancelled, the less trust we have in what they tell us which is why every time I see concept art now I’ll believe it looks like that or even happened when I see it
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
That's fine but then don't announce all these things before hand. Be like every other park and only announce new attractions well into the construction phase. End the D23 expos
Come on man.

Disney shouldn't announce projects to prevent some people feeling like things were budget cut? They should just ignore all the people who like these announcements? Who like watching the progress? Who appreciate seeing how these projects evolve? D23 exists for a reason.

How about the people who can't handle their own expectations just stop paying attention instead of insisting others lose out.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
If they want the D23 expos that’s fine, but enough with showing things that aren’t in progress. The more they do that and things get cancelled, the less trust we have in what they tell us which is why every time I see concept art now I’ll believe it looks like that or even happened when I see it

It’s just a comic con…

But for some reason people now pick and choose whether it’s that…or an SEC filing…

And then they make excuses or do lame podcasts…vacillate between the 2
 
Last edited:

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
Come on man.

Disney shouldn't announce projects to prevent some people feeling like things were budget cut? They should just ignore all the people who like these announcements? Who like watching the progress? Who appreciate seeing how these projects evolve? D23 exists for a reason.

How about the people who can't handle their own expectations just stop paying attention instead of insisting others lose out.
I never said not to announce anything. If they need announce new attractions at D23 keep it to things that are well past the concept art of phase. Attractions that are coming in the next year or two.
 

WorldExplorer

Well-Known Member
I swear I feel like I've fallen into an alternate dimension whenever people start acting like dinosaurs aren't a huge thing. I see those things everywhere.

Uh, did you miss this bomb?
View attachment 838301

Dinosaur was the fifth highest grossing film of 2000 (highest grossing animated film) and fourth highest home video seller of 2001. Adjusted for inflation it made over 600 million.

It didn't have a lasting impact, but it was absolutely not a bomb.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
I never said not to announce anything. If they need announce new attractions at D23 keep it to things that are well past the concept art of phase. Attractions that are coming in the next year or two.
Again, some of us enjoy the earlier look at things but even if they waited, that still wouldn't prevent a budget running over and modifications being made.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Then explain Galaxies Edge? There was supposed to be a lot more to that land but it got cut at the last minute New Fantasyland was supposed to be a lot different but we ended up with a bunch of Princess stuff.
How many times does this need to be explained? If you’re redoing your kitchen and end up buying a more basic refrigerator because you got a fancier oven, you didn’t cut your budget. You spent the same amount of money, just differently.

In general yes that's true. Compared to other park companies most don't cut the budget much. For most the new attractions, what they reveal is what they end up being.
Most parks are spending the bulk of their money on something that already exists. Even custom coaster layouts are compromised of lot established and understood components.

I understand many of you have been around a lot longer than me, but the jaded pessimism is really something.
How is pessimism not the appropriate response to this subject? What is supposed to be the world’s premier fixed amusement company is once again starting to panic over something that anyone with a modicum of sense and experience would have foreseen. There is absolutely no reason for cuts unless you have no understanding of the business and are thoroughly incapable of explaining the ups and downs of the business.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
We could reduce 75% of this thread if people understood the difference between operational cost cutting and capital expenditure.

How did we escalate from they are reducing kitchen staff to Tropical Americas is in trouble?

The last real significant tightening (during normal times) was 2015 against Shanghai. It really did nothing to WDW's capital expenditure plan. Quarterly belt tightening is pretty normal when we know they are having a soft 2 quarters followed by improved metrics post Epic..
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately some people here would like that just to be proven right…
the only people I see insisting they are 100% right are the people that are 100% sure it’s going to happen.

I believe it’s still the plan but until dinosaur actually closes I do believe that plans could change. The odds of them changing I have no idea.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
1. I’d say that one is almost certain to never happen…a “blue sky” misdirection by design to sell timeshares
2. That one I think is pretty assured. Like 75%. Only if water management is a headache Will they scrap that
3. Nah…that’s a go. Its ip bombardment and reskinned RNRC to call it something “new”. Not really a net add either…assuming no show ever arrives…just the door ride.
4/5. That’s a go…more ip bombardment. Though I bet what they’re planning is inadequate to provide Crowd relief or a new draw to dak. Gotta aim bigger.

Even Walter thinks 4/5 of the major projects are going to occur. That's practically unbridled optimism.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom