Polkadotdress
Well-Known Member
The slooooow March towards vaccine coverage continues, and at this rate we will be in a better place by…February?!?!
The slooooow March towards vaccine coverage continues, and at this rate we will be in a better place by…February?!?!
There is a difference between people visiting patient care areas and people seeking life-saving shelter. Hospitals have many areas, conference rooms, cafeterias, etc., in which people can stay temporarily that has no impact on clinical staff.They do when there is a visitor limitation. Anyone with a medical problem can check into the ER, but the pubic can and will be removed from the premises.
I’m sure there is either an outright ban or a severe limit on visitors in those hospitals because of Covid.
The slooooow March towards vaccine coverage continues, and at this rate we will be in a better place by…February?!?!
Either way, its going to further strain a system that's already heavily overburdened. True, someone simply sheltering in a hospital won't chew up nearly as many resources as an admitted patient, but it will still require extra staffing, security and food.There is a difference between people visiting patient care areas and people seeking life-saving shelter. Hospitals have many areas, conference rooms, cafeterias, etc., in which people can stay temporarily that has no impact on clinical staff.
Hopefully it won’t come to hospitals having to decide to turn people away.
or someone being denied admission to a sporting event, concert or play due to vaccination status.Perhaps someone short of breath saying “I wish I had gotten Comirnaty” before the ventilator is hooked up. A much darker commercial.
The slooooow March towards vaccine coverage continues, and at this rate we will be in a better place by…February?!?!
Absolutely.Either way, its going to further strain a system that's already heavily overburdened. True, someone simply sheltering in a hospital won't chew up nearly as many resources as an admitted patient, but it will still require extra staffing, security and food.
And if I-10 gets knocked out like happened during Katrina, the situation will be even worse.
I don’t think Katrina was a 5 at landfall. Pretty sure I read only 4 have made landfall as a 5…..Labor Day, Camille, Andrew, and Michael. I could be wrong.Katrina was a cat 5 and the real damage was from flooding caused by the canal wall failure. It played out over days as the water rose.
The wind effects are secondary but the storm surge will tell the tale of what damage is done.
It was given that name ( By Pfizer/BioNtech ) last fall. I even linked the name announcement back then.For some reason, the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine is now named Comirnaty. I guess they wanted something less pronounceable.
Right it was a massive 3 so not the wind but the flooding did the damageI don’t think Katrina was a 5 at landfall. Pretty sure I read only 4 have made landfall as a 5…..Labor Day, Camille, Andrew, and Michael. I could be wrong.
Well, we were initially thinking 70% was what was needed for herd immunity, right? And now, that the estimate is much higher, if that Tweet were to be updated, it would likely say “Estimate time of completion: when pigs fly.”70% seems kind of arbitrary at this point. It certainly is better than where we stand now, and it will definately relieve some of the pressure on hospitals. But as we've seen, 70% isn't nearly enough to prevent the virus from ripping through the unvaccinated population.
Given all the phizer and pizers and such I see, I am not sure I agree. Nevermind BioNTechIt was given that name ( By Pfizer/BioNtech ) last fall. I even linked the name announcement back then.
Pfizer vaccine is just easier to say and spell. I do not think Pfizer will get much traction in getting people to use the brand name, they haven’t so far.
How often have we seen the brand name of their covid vaccine used vs news and people calling it “the Pfizer vaccine”.Given all the phizer and pizers and such I see, I am not sure I agree. Nevermind BioNTech
My state views cases as active until either specifically told the person has recovered (or died) or 30 days have passed since diagnosis.Every day I see the number of Covid positive cases added. But how many are presumed recovered that same day? Perhaps the number from two weeks ago, allowing that amount of time to recover as an example? And of course subtracting deaths. I suppose its possible to get various ballparks but with a pretty significant margin of error since its not a hard number like hospitalizations or confirmed positives. You cant confirm a negative, in logic-speak.
This is not a comment on the seriousness of the pandemic. Nor how to fight it. Just that if we are going to be obsessed over daily numbers then we should also understand all the other numbers that arrive at them. As well as other numbers that, pardon me for saying, just arent as interesting. The media knows that talking about the number of positives reported that day generates viewers and web hits. Recoveries do not.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.