easyrowrdw
Well-Known Member
Serious question... which news sources are considered trustworthy in the US?
I think it's mostly dependent on who you ask.
Serious question... which news sources are considered trustworthy in the US?
Serious question... which news sources are considered trustworthy in the US?
What you are describing is exactly what I'm talking about. Most people's definition of "care about x" is the equivalent of my wife caring about her potted plant. She cares about it enough to take care of it, water it, make sure it has sun. But if there's a trip to WDW coming up and she can't find anyone to water her plant, she will just let it fend for itself. Even if that means it could die.
When I say people don't really care about anyone outside of their circle of friends and family, my point is they don't care about others more than they do a potted plant. They care about people as long as it fills their own need to feel personal pride that "I care about people". That is, until it interferes with their inner circle's rights/priorities/goals. At that point everyone is left in the lurch to fend for themselves.
That is sad.
June 1 is when Disney and Disneyland are honoring reservations for hotels and dinners. When I heard Trump speak last night talking about June 1 getting back to some normalcy it clicked that perhaps Disney knew about the April 30 extension and are planning for a June 1 opening. Lake Burns Vista hotels are also giving a June 1 date. The graphs that people look on as gospel show no covid deaths by July.
Serious question... which news sources are considered trustworthy in the US?
Do you know how much worse a double dip recession would be if we come out of this too early and then there is a relapse? Far more damage to the economy long term than waiting a few more weeks.
The other factor is you need customers to make money. If they open businesses while the death count is still rising how many people will want to take a cruise or book a flight or even go to a mall?
Fair enough and we can agree to disagree. Let me ask you this, on March 1st if I told you your governor would have you locked down for at least 6 weeks and all non-essential businesses would be closed would you have had the same reaction? Predicting civil unrest? I think a lot of us thought we would never see the day this was necessary, but people realize the seriousness of the situation and adapt. Not saying we like it but these are unprecedented times.
Already didDid Maryland go to June 10th too?
There are people who are working from home receiving their normal pay. There are small business owners who may not survive this. There are unemployed people who will not see any check for weeks.
When talking about adaptability, I’d be sure to think of who can adapt for long periods of time, and why.
It isn't a ridiculous question, nor are the numbers in any way ridiculous based on what is known about the virus at this point. We have a low infection rate because we have are quasi-lockdown going on and a ban on large gatherings Eliminate that ban on large gatherings and the number of cases will skyrocket so fast there will be no hope of getting everyone that need an ICU bed access to one. If that happens it really wouldn't be a 1 in a 100 death rate it would be much higher. But if you want to go pretend that nothing you can't see is going to hurt you feel free... I just want to know if the kid who loses his mom or dad from the virus would have been happier if their mom or dad had just lost their job but was still around to give them a hug.1) Of course the world will exist without theaters. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm focused on the people who work those jobs. Who depend on those jobs. Not just the $8/hr workers, but those in middle management who make $80-100K a year.
2) Your question is so asinine and short-sighted. First off, even if you take the number of cases in the US and multiplied it by 15x, you would still only have .7% of the population infected. It's not 1 out of every 100 people are automatically dead. It's 1.8% of those who GET it die, at this point (that number gets thrown out immediately if you take into account that more people than have been tested have it making it closer to .1% if you take the number of cases currently and multiplied by 15x). Not even going to spend additional time answering this ridiculous question.
Did Maryland go to June 10th too?
Yeah! Lets stick with the news channel that said this was a hoax instead.That’s why I don’t watch MSNBC or CNN. we need to work together. Time to stop feeding the panic.
And the ban on large gatherings is what will keep those resources from being overwhelmed... once they are overwhelmed we both know your odds of dying from it jump up a lot.The world has existed with infectious diseases. Only one human disease has been successfully eradicated. There is no guarantee that a vaccine will be developed, that the virus will not mutate and that the virus will be eradicated.
Outside of overwhelmed resources, your odds of dying don’t increase because others survive.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. I have personally saved the planet 15 times at great personal risk.
It all depends on your personal politics and to be frank, our politics are quite stupid.Serious question... which news sources are considered trustworthy in the US?
Serious question... which news sources are considered trustworthy in the US?
Depends on what your political leanings are, and that's all I'll say about that. This site does a pretty good job of ranking news sources impartially, though: https://www.adfontesmedia.comSerious question... which news sources are considered trustworthy in the US?
I think even the most liberal and conservative mainstream sources are providing the same basic facts when they speak about what is officially known about the virus... it is just that you often have to ignore the bias slant that they all put on everything. Unfortunately there is no source that gives you a Joe Friday "just the facts" run down... they all want to give it spin which is incredibly annoying.It is very surreal.
It all depends on your personal politics and to be frank, our politics are quite stupid.
MSNBC reported of possible priblem with the food supply. I thought it was sensational reporting and done for political reasons. It is just an example of the irresponsible reporting done by NBC news.
The government is providing relief. $1,200 per person in a one time check plus if unemployed on average $1,000 a week from unemployment covers almost anyone’s basic needs. People will riot if they can’t buy food or are removed from their homes. That’s not happening. All of the stuff talked about is averages and typical situations. I understand that not everyone is made whole by the government assistance but it takes the masses to rise up not the exceptions. I know it’s hard for small business owners but again, not the typical demographic to take to the streets and riot. I agree people will be unhappy. I agree they will complain about it to anyone that listens. I don’t see those same people taking to the street to riot. Just my opinion, O could be wrong.I don’t know the number of people who would still book a flight, take a cruise, or go to the mall.
What I know is that there are people and families in America who will not see any pay for several weeks, and have probably lost all medical benefits- not that they can go for anything other than an emergency now anyway, even if they pay for COBRA...we’ve seen study after study in this country showing that too many people live paycheck to paycheck and/or above their means.. now all of their means are taken from them.. then you add in the small business owners who are watching their life’s work crumble, and as a result- I predict unrest.
Maybe it won’t happen, but either way, I don’t think it’s as easy as simply saying “they know it’s for the good of our health”
To be absolutely clear- this is not in reference to short term orders.. I am specifically talking about if the orders turn into months ie Virginia
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.