Then, there is the potential "lawyer" side to these measures: What are the BEST things WDW can do to limit liability?
All a guess on my part - I'm a Chemist, not a lawyer.... Would LOVE to have a real lawyer comment
![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
.
1) Temp Checks - that's an active act on WDW's part. One of those "your system failed to protect me" arguments. Hire someone ELSE to do the checks? Better.
2) WDW masks
![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
. Oh LORD no ! You can guess why
![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
. Another active act
![Frown :( :(](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png)
. Resell someone else's masks? Better, if they are somehow "approved" by some agency.
3) Mandating that guests wear their OWN masks. Better - it's YOUR PPE. If it fails? Not a WDW issue.
4) if the current waiver of liability at WDW is insufficient? I suspect we'll see an enhanced waiver
![Frown :( :(](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png)
.
I'm leaving out the obvious "level of cleaning" thing... it's really not possible to declare what level of cleaning is OK
![Frown :( :(](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png)
.