This is the current top rated comment on this article (and a NYT pick):
"I'd like to The NYTimes convene and share the content of a panel discussion of the following people:
A working parent of a developmentally disabled, autistic, handicapped or otherwise special needs child who depends on services offered in the public schools, services his parents are not able or qualified to provide him.
A person close to retirement whose savings could be decimated or even just evaporate in an economic depression, making the difference between the dignified and comfortable retirement she expected and a miserable, impoverished, and, yes, attenuated old age.
An hourly worker who has been fired or laid off and who soon won't be able to afford food, let alone rent.
A couple who will be unable to pay for their children's educations due to pay cuts, job loss, etc. subsequent to a prolonged shutdown.
A patient whose cancer surgery has been postponed due to wildly inaccurate projections of hospital use somewhere other than NYC.
A worker who has lost her job and therefore her health insurance and can't afford life sustaining medications. People with insurance couldn't afford insulin before this!
Instead, we get a panel of well fed, well paid, and comfortably housed "thinkers" airily tossing out prognostications of endless, untenable shutdowns. I'll bet my group would have much a different discussion and conclusions."
- UpperEastSideGuy