GoofGoof
Premium Member
I got away with it. I didn’t need to see a doctor and had no expenses so I just never activated it.Very good example. I’ve had to use cobra before the 60 days were up and was extremely glad I had it.
I got away with it. I didn’t need to see a doctor and had no expenses so I just never activated it.Very good example. I’ve had to use cobra before the 60 days were up and was extremely glad I had it.
And the high school senior that turned 19 was everyone's best friend if you needed someone to buy alcohol.I could have lived without prom too...but those parties were a pretty good time
They finished selling the last of the stock in Dec of 2013, the price was in the 39's per share. It wasn't until Oct of 2017 that the share price went over 40. It traded in the mid 30 during that time, was in the low 40's for a little while and then dropped back into the mid to upper 30's. Looks like they sold at a good peak. If they held out until late 2017, they may have broke even with the slightly higher share price coupled with the resumption of the quarterly dividend, but the pressure was on to close out the books of TARP.You're right. It was all mixed together. Not sure why I always thought of them as separate. Looks like I was wrong about Ally too; we did get our money back on that. Woohoo! Haha
I don't think there was much of a chance of GM stock reaching the levels needed for the government to make a profit, though. But I think economists still say it was the right decision.
New York City is already starting to breakdown healthcare wise. Also the outbreak wasn't traced to any Chinese workers in ItalyIn terms of this I don't think it's a fair comparison given the average age of those dying and affected in Italy and our healthcare system vs theirs. Also Northern Italy has a high population of factory workers from Wuhan many of whom went home for the Chinese New Year and then flew back to Italy unchecked and unregulated.
I could have lived without prom too...but those parties were a pretty good time
The US has 35 ventilators per 100,000 population while Italy has 12. They have a much older population and they kiss each other's cheeks as a greeting. It's difficult to compare any two countries regarding the spread of this virus.Tell that to Italy.
I didn't attend my prom.
For me, my friends were the neighborhood kids - and school was separate from that. Literally, my high school was in "the 'hood."
My neighborhood friends weren't in my school (well, one was - but he was a grade ahead of me and I never saw him) I attended school, than caught the train home to hang out with my neighborhood friends.
Listen. I’m watching our news right now where deaths are up by ONE THIRD in 24 hours. Don’t come crying about college football being cancelled.China really?????????
Tell it to anyone who’s naive then.The US has 35 ventilators per 100,000 population while Italy has 12. They have a much older population and they kiss each other's cheeks as a greeting. It's difficult to compare any two countries regarding the spread of this virus.
One death is one too many.Indeed, tell it to Italy (.01% of pop. dead) and Spain (.0049%). However, China (.00022%) and Germany (.00014%) have, relatively speaking, lower numbers (for now).
Tell it to anyone who’s naive then.
You say that like you think I’ve read it.This article seems to support his assertion. What part do you disagree with?
SCCM: Too Few Ventilators, ICU Beds Available for Worst-Case COVID-19 Scenario
Even with less-than-fully-functional models pressed into service, shortages likelywww.medpagetoday.com
Last year over 600,000 people died in the UK - that would be about 1% of a normal year.One death is one too many.
Current projection is the UK will be lucky if the dead number around 6,000.
According to the Washington Post if Trump reopens the economy he will be responsible for deaths caused by the opening. The question I have is who is responsible for the deaths caused by closing the economy? If anyone thinks there will not be any they are delusional.
And that’s meant to be a good thing?Last year over 600,000 people died in the UK - that would be about a 1% increase over a normal year.
Not an endorsement. Just a logical, often quoted statement.I am not trying to be argumentative (and I feel uneasy asking this of perhaps the most respected member of this board), but...
What does your statement mean? Why is any honest discussion of numbers taken to be an endorsement of death? Are there really folks on this board who think death is good and should not be combatted? Statements like "one death is to many" or "if we save just one life..." are conversation-enders that, if taken to their logical conclusion, are absurd.
Again, with all due respect!
The worldwide economy is crashing. That is not a reason to want to back off on life saving measures."Crying" about the economy is not merely a selfish complaint about losing money. It is often a genuine concern about the future of society, really. The "economy" is not just one's pocketbook. It is the sum total of millions of individual human interactions. Life itself, really. It think that is worth being concerned about.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.