easyrowrdw
Well-Known Member
You’ve misunderstood his meaning. The quotation in question: “And so we are revising our quotes, our central best estimate of the reproduction… something more, a little bit above of the order of three or a little bit above rather than about 2.5.”
In other words, he now thinks the infection rate may be slightly above 3, whereas previously he thought it was closer to 2.5.
This does not represent a major shift in his thinking or modelling. See the following from back in January:
“Ferguson, whose team have been modelling the disease for the World Health Organization, said they estimated the virus had a reproductive rate of 2.5-3, meaning that each person infected would potentially transmit it to up to three others.”
Coronavirus: 100,000 may already be infected, experts warn | Coronavirus | The Guardian
UK government urged to reassure public that NHS is ready for cases within daysamp.theguardian.com
Thank you! I thought the phrasing was odd, but I figured it was just a British thing.