DisneyCane
Well-Known Member
The comparison to the flu is absolutely appropriate. The "experts" don't even know how many people are actually infected with SARS-CoV-2 and therefore don't know what the mortality rate is. It spreads faster than the flu mostly because people sick with the flu are usually ill enough that they stay home in bed. With this virus, very mild cases or asymptomatic cases lead to people going about their business because they think they have an annoying cold or nothing at all.This is nothing like the flu, the comparison to the flu is not appropriate at all. I am not a medical professional, I am an attorney, not an expert by amy means. But here are what the experts are saying. This virus spreads faster then the flux this virus has a higher mortality rate then the flu, this virus has an acute morality rate for folks in at risk categories. The prospective that we should shrug and move on for those too weak to survive is horrid, we live in a society, a civilized society where we need to support each other. 1 death , 1 grandfather dying because someone had to go to the beach that day is one person too many. If you disagree we don't have a difference of fact, we have a difference of morality.
The same people susceptible to this are also susceptible to the flu. Some portion of those killed by this would have been killed by the flu in a similar this year..
We do have a difference in morality. Adversely effecting the lives of over 99% of the population so that 1 grandfather lives a little longer is not a justified trade-off. Every day that this nonsense goes on, people are losing their jobs (may of which will take a while to come back) and losing their ability to enjoy life. Every day 7.7 BILLION people are being deprived of a day of quality life.
Here's the bottom line. If these same lockdowns were to happen for flu season every year we would save over 250,000 lives a year. Would you argue that we should start doing that? There is no cure for the flu and the vaccine does not prevent all strains.
Also, regarding the experts, if you go back and track Dr. Fauci's statements he has made several contradictions over the past few weeks.
Just to head off the argument of this virus killing 1% or whatever of the world population, I do not accept that premise because the mortality rate is not known. The "experts" are making decisions based on worst-case scenarios, not real data. I still believe that if this virus wasn't discovered made known, the world would have just thought it was a particularly bad flu season. Even in the worst case country, Italy, the number of deaths is a very tiny percentage of their population.
You can disagree with my morality but this is how I feel.