correcaminos
Well-Known Member
Appreciate your thoughts. We can agree to disagree that it is being oversold. I went from "we don't know, but it looks good" to "still pretty good but not the best"I appreciate your posting of the articles. I was talking about this very thing in a private forum not too long ago that we need to hear more about what having covid does or does not do in terms of immunity. I think that is why some people are wondering about the topic. The narrative is to ignore natural immunity to push the vaccine (hence being oversold and why I quoted it along with that other post). I understand why they would do this but it isn't helping. I disagree with the likes of Sam Harris (semi-popular? intellectual who I am quite fond of) who said that this is not the time to be asking questions. Total garbage. This is exactly the time to be asking questions. It's not my problem that there is an overabundance of morons (and this coming from the dumbest forum member, mind you) that cannot handle the nuance.
Immunity from having Covid previously does offer a measure of protection. No, it may not offer the same measure of protection as the vaccine, but nevertheless, there is immunity. The fact that people may want to hear about those things does not indicate being an anti-vaxxer and even if they are an anti-vaxxer, the legitimacy of the topic still stands. It can be and should be discussed. I will not stand for discourse being curtailed just because there are people who think Covid is a hoax and the vaccine is a CIA mind-control drug.
Oddly friends who were earlier cases and really bad off didn't care about how good their natural immunity was. They wanted everything in their power to make sure they didn't live it or have it worse. Just a differing point of view. Neither is right or wrong in my opinion. Though some do use "natural immunity" as anti-vax rhetoric. Not all do, but many who often had covid 2 or more times too
I do think many are looking at all angles, but IRL not everyone sees that they are.