Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoofGoof

Premium Member
We tried good faith. The results speak for themselves
I don’t think that’s what she meant but I hear what you are saying for sure. I was initially opposed to vaccine passports and trying to require vaccination because I honestly (naively???) thought we could get most people to go on their own and that would have been the better path for society as a whole. I was wrong (not the first time 🥺). We tried good faith, we tried letting people make the right decision on their own. Now we go to plan B. The vast majority of people support vaccines, the vast majority of adults (over 70%) have already taken a jab. Public sentiment has overwhelmingly swung in favor of requiring vaccination. The best way to accomplish this is through companies requiring employees to have it and eventually schools and colleges requiring it. We don’t need a Federal mandate. Once full FDA approval is given I would be highly in favor of the CDC recommending that all companies require employees be vaccinated to report to in person work. This would give companies an easy message and help them to put these rules in place. It didn’t have to be this way, but plan B it is.
 

hopemax

Well-Known Member
So as fate would have it Andy Slavitt's podcast guest this week, was Dr. Osterholm. I had never actually listened to one of them before, but I had a sorting project and given his name was invoked today, I went ahead and gave it a listen. As, I remembered, Dr. Osterholm is the real doom & gloomer in all of this, and they referenced his pessimism a couple times, and the Dr. brought up how his news media friends say, that "Nobody wants to listen to him, because of the things he says."

They talked about several things, but the overall message was the need to remain humble in the face of this new virus. He mentioned people who presume this will resolve like an influenza pandemic, and he does not think that path is certain. He thinks we will continue to be surprised by the turns this takes, and that Spring gave people a sense of overconfidence. He is surprised by how and when things flare in one place, but not another. How one person seems to be able to spread to a dozen vaccinated people, while others don't. He thinks there are characteristics that are not well understood by anyone, so be wary of that which implies confidence in outcome.

They talked about schools, and he did not say school should be virtual, and that he recognizes the value of in-person school, he did say parents need to be realistic about what will happen. He pointed out the guidance policy makers are using is from 2020, and was appropriate for then, but not now. He understands it is hard (impossible) for kids to wear N95 masks, but without them a classroom environment will lead to transmission like camps have been this summer. He considers the concerns about pediatric long COVID as valid, and even though they are the least at risk group, poor outcomes are expected at a higher frequency than regular flu. Parents need to appreciate the seriousness of Delta, and that this is not a risk-free situation for their kids.

And they talked about how vaccines are the most important weapon we have, and the need to get the world, and the vaccine hesitant vaccinated. Don't get hung up with the vaccine hostile, they are pretty much lost.

I am sure everyone who hung on every word he said about cloth masks will be sobered by his thoughts about what the future might be, and that this is still not over. Remember, he's the guy that thinks this will take 3 years.

Changing subjects, an interesting tangent that crossed my Twitter feed today, a new study theorizes that the pandemic of 1889-1890 aka the Russian Flu, might not have been influenza at all (or not just an influenza). But the emergence of one of the other known coronaviruses HCoV-OC43. This pandemic, caused some researches to reexamine the medical recordings and findings from that time, including veterinary data, and thought the reported symptoms sounded a lot like the type of systemic stuff that is happening this time, including loss of smell and protracted recovery times for some, like long COVID. After SARS, a researcher compared modern OC43 sequences and those of bovine coronaviruses and determined they likely shared a common ancestor about 130 years ago, or about the time of the so called flu. A Swedish researcher did the same, last year and came to the same conclusion about the timeline.

Obviously, still just a theory, but here's what Wikipedia says about the timeline that played out "The most reported effects of the pandemic took place from October 1889 to December 1890, with recurrences in March to June 1891, November 1891 to June 1892, winter of 1893–1894, and early 1895." That's a lot of winters, with it still being a thing. Good thing we have vaccines.

 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
You can all save the strawman and non-sense arguments, they aren't going to work. All they do is just show that you don't like to hear the truth and you are trying to twist logic so you don't have to actually admit it hurts you to hear it.
If you work for Walmart, Google, Netflix, Disney or Tyson Foods and want to keep your job you will have to be vaccinated. Amazon, Apple, Uber , Lyft and the major banks and Wall Street firms are all reported to be considering further plans too. That‘s no straw man, just a fact of life for hundreds of thousands of workers and likely to be millions more soon. That’s the truth I like to hear and it certainly doesn’t hurt. :)
 

DisneyFan32

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
So as fate would have it Andy Slavitt's podcast guest this week, was Dr. Osterholm. I had never actually listened to one of them before, but I had a sorting project and given his name was invoked today, I went ahead and gave it a listen. As, I remembered, Dr. Osterholm is the real doom & gloomer in all of this, and they referenced his pessimism a couple times, and the Dr. brought up how his news media friends say, that "Nobody wants to listen to him, because of the things he says."

They talked about several things, but the overall message was the need to remain humble in the face of this new virus. He mentioned people who presume this will resolve like an influenza pandemic, and he does not think that path is certain. He thinks we will continue to be surprised by the turns this takes, and that Spring gave people a sense of overconfidence. He is surprised by how and when things flare in one place, but not another. How one person seems to be able to spread to a dozen vaccinated people, while others don't. He thinks there are characteristics that are not well understood by anyone, so be wary of that which implies confidence in outcome.

They talked about schools, and he did not say school should be virtual, and that he recognizes the value of in-person school, he did say parents need to be realistic about what will happen. He pointed out the guidance policy makers are using is from 2020, and was appropriate for then, but not now. He understands it is hard (impossible) for kids to wear N95 masks, but without them a classroom environment will lead to transmission like camps have been this summer. He considers the concerns about pediatric long COVID as valid, and even though they are the least at risk group, poor outcomes are expected at a higher frequency than regular flu. Parents need to appreciate the seriousness of Delta, and that this is not a risk-free situation for their kids.

And they talked about how vaccines are the most important weapon we have, and the need to get the world, and the vaccine hesitant vaccinated. Don't get hung up with the vaccine hostile, they are pretty much lost.

I am sure everyone who hung on every word he said about cloth masks will be sobered by his thoughts about what the future might be, and that this is still not over. Remember, he's the guy that thinks this will take 3 years.

Changing subjects, an interesting tangent that crossed my Twitter feed today, a new study theorizes that the pandemic of 1889-1890 aka the Russian Flu, might not have been influenza at all (or not just an influenza). But the emergence of one of the other known coronaviruses HCoV-OC43. This pandemic, caused some researches to reexamine the medical recordings and findings from that time, including veterinary data, and thought the reported symptoms sounded a lot like the type of systemic stuff that is happening this time, including loss of smell and protracted recovery times for some, like long COVID. After SARS, a researcher compared modern OC43 sequences and those of bovine coronaviruses and determined they likely shared a common ancestor about 130 years ago, or about the time of the so called flu. A Swedish researcher did the same, last year and came to the same conclusion about the timeline.

Obviously, still just a theory, but here's what Wikipedia says about the timeline that played out "The most reported effects of the pandemic took place from October 1889 to December 1890, with recurrences in March to June 1891, November 1891 to June 1892, winter of 1893–1894, and early 1895." That's a lot of winters, with it still being a thing. Good thing we have vaccines.

I don't want want three more years of pandemic in USA. I don't want this really happen.
 

DisneyFan32

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
I don’t think that’s what she meant but I hear what you are saying for sure. I was initially opposed to vaccine passports and trying to require vaccination because I honestly (naively???) thought we could get most people to go on their own and that would have been the better path for society as a whole. I was wrong (not the first time 🥺). We tried good faith, we tried letting people make the right decision on their own. Now we go to plan B. The vast majority of people support vaccines, the vast majority of adults (over 70%) have already taken a jab. Public sentiment has overwhelmingly swung in favor of requiring vaccination. The best way to accomplish this is through companies requiring employees to have it and eventually schools and colleges requiring it. We don’t need a Federal mandate. Once full FDA approval is given I would be highly in favor of the CDC recommending that all companies require employees be vaccinated to report to in person work. This would give companies an easy message and help them to put these rules in place. It didn’t have to be this way, but plan B it is.
Will the indoor masks will ending soon as alot of people are vaccinating by early Fall?
 

DisneyDebRob

Well-Known Member
If you work for Walmart, Google, Netflix, Disney or Tyson Foods and want to keep your job you will have to be vaccinated. Amazon, Apple, Uber , Lyft and the major banks and Wall Street firms are all reported to be considering further plans too. That‘s no straw man, just a fact of life for hundreds of thousands of workers and likely to be millions more soon. That’s the truth I like to hear and it certainly doesn’t hurt. :)
IMO… just imagine how many more vaccinated we would have if we started this months ago. I know there are people on both sides of the fence on this issue but I think it would have been a game changer back then. Passports of some sort for indoor shows… restaurants.. jobs..etc. I’ve been saying it for months and I guess better late then never but we possibly.. no we would have saved a lot of agony I think.
 

mmascari

Well-Known Member
And for the last freaking time, practice some damn PERSONAL responsibility. That means protect yourself. It does not mean expecting others to do something to themselves for your protection.
Nobody owes you anything, especially if that anything is injecting their own bodies with something they are against putting into it.
As far as withholding coverage, as long as people are paying for their insurance I don't care what the company pays for.
Being out in public and keeping you or anyone whose vaccinated status is unknown from breathing on them is taking responsibility.

What gives you the right to breath disease on someone else? Sure you think you don’t have it. But buy the time you know, it’ll be to late. It’s 100% on you to keep it to yourself and not on others to just avoid you.

At some point, there’s going to be people taking vaccine passports into their own hands and forcibly removing others. Not just my kid, which is still cute. But some big burly guy out with his Nanna and not taking any chances. Gotta keep Nanna safe, and not accepting used air from an unknown source is part of that.
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
IMO… just imagine how many more vaccinated we would have if we started this months ago. I know there are people on both sides of the fence on this issue but I think it would have been a game changer back then. Passports of some sort for indoor shows… restaurants.. jobs..etc. I’ve been saying it for months and I guess better late then never but we possibly.. no we would have saved a lot of agony I think.
Yes and no. It would be great to be further along, but I think it works better now that we have a smaller minority unvaccinated. It’s difficult for employers to enforce vaccine requirements on employees and businesses to enforce passports on customers when the majority of people were not vaccinated. I’m still not sure it will be easy to enforce passports on customers, but I’m encouraged to see employers start to require them. We see examples all the time of customers fighting flight attendants and cashiers and theme park workers when they don’t like policies but you rarely see someone throwing a tantrum like that at work over rules they don’t like.
 

mmascari

Well-Known Member
I was initially opposed to vaccine passports and trying to require vaccination because I honestly (naively???) thought we could get most people to go on their own and that would have been the better path for society as a whole.
I’ve said it before, it’s hope. You have the most hopeful while still grounded posts instead of simply wishful thinking. Keep at it. There’s plenty of others who have given up hope already.

Posted while I’m on vacation, not at WDW because we didn’t trust the numbers would go by now. Thankful that I’m not at WDW because the numbers are worse now. There was a few weeks when it looked like we guessed wrong. Yet, somehow still in a red transmission location with a positivity over 10%. At least we’re able to do distance things and eat takeout. The people we see some places are jammed in so tight, it’s no wonder the county is red. We’ve adjusted activities to avoid those. Total rainout today really limited our options.
 

correcaminos

Well-Known Member
And for the last freaking time, practice some damn PERSONAL responsibility. That means protect yourself. It does not mean expecting others to do something to themselves for your protection.
Nobody owes you anything, especially if that anything is injecting their own bodies with something they are against putting into it.
As far as withholding coverage, as long as people are paying for their insurance I don't care what the company pays for.
This mentality is exactly the problem now. Vaccines never work in the singular like you are saying. They rely on groups to create solid immunity for all. Otherwise with any disease running rampant vaccines singularly won't be as effective. The amount of people who do not understand this astounds me. Do pediatricians not use this as a line of explaining why one should vaccinate?
 

DisneyCane

Well-Known Member
South Florida, a private caregiver that came to the retirement community my mom works at tested positive on Thursday of last week and died today. My mom is pretty shaken by it. Unvaccinated, late 40s.
Hopefully many people who are unvaccinated hear about this and it motivates them to get vaccinated. I may be anti-a lot of things COVID related but I'm about as pro-vaccine as you can get.
 

StarWarsGirl

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
You can all save the strawman and non-sense arguments, they aren't going to work. All they do is just show that you don't like to hear the truth and you are trying to twist logic so you don't have to actually admit it hurts you to hear it.
Here's some logic:

Humankind eradicated smallpox through vaccines
Polio was effectively eradicated by vaccines.
They had effectively eradicated measles, and then it came back because a small group of people decided that they didn't like vaccines.

Vaccines only work when the vast majority of the population gets the vaccine.

We could end this pandemic if people would just get the vaccines, but somehow people have this idea that the vaccine is somehow more dangerous than the disease that has killed 4.25 million people globally. That's just baffling.
 

Figgy1

Well-Known Member
This mentality is exactly the problem now. Vaccines never work in the singular like you are saying. They rely on groups to create solid immunity for all. Otherwise with any disease running rampant vaccines singularly won't be as effective. The amount of people who do not understand this astounds me. Do pediatricians not use this as a line of explaining why one should vaccinate?
One would hope people would have remembered that from high school biology
 

RobbinsDad

Well-Known Member
Full FDA approval May help get some people who are actually hesitant for that reason over the hump. I fear for many who claim it’s a big deal it’s just a buzzword they have heard as an excuse why the vaccine isn’t safe and as soon as it happens they will switch excuses. What it will definitely do is make it even easier for corporations to justify requiring vaccination for all workers. Some companies are hesitant to require vaccination while the vaccine is under EUA but once that hurdle is cleared we should see an increase in that trend. It started already and in large, well respected companies so let’s hope the trend continues.
It’s possible that full approval may change some minds but I’m not optimistic it will be very many. The same people who mistrust most things government and science aren’t likely to push that aside in this case.
 

DisneyFan32

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
It’s possible that full approval may change some minds but I’m not optimistic it will be very many. The same people who mistrust most things government and science aren’t likely to push that aside in this case.
Imagine that, now this full approval will make people change their minds about this fall/winter season as we will want the pandemic end as we will go back to normal soon as possible with no more masks and social distancing ever!
 

RobbinsDad

Well-Known Member
Full FDA approval May help get some people who are actually hesitant for that reason over the hump. I fear for many who claim it’s a big deal it’s just a buzzword they have heard as an excuse why the vaccine isn’t safe and as soon as it happens they will switch excuses. What it will definitely do is make it even easier for corporations to justify requiring vaccination for all workers. Some companies are hesitant to require vaccination while the vaccine is under EUA but once that hurdle is cleared we should see an increase in that trend. It started already and in large, well respected companies so let’s hope the trend continues.
Another thought: once the vaccine is fully approved, health insurers might start charging higher premiums for those without the vaccine. The precedent is already there for smokers.
 

GoofGoof

Premium Member
It’s possible that full approval may change some minds but I’m not optimistic it will be very many. The same people who mistrust most things government and science aren’t likely to push that aside in this case.
Another thought: once the vaccine is fully approved, health insurers might start charging higher premiums for those without the vaccine. The precedent is already there for smokers.
I think there could be some who change their mind based on full approval. We are also approaching 1 year from the initial trial so how much longer do people need to see the vaccines are safe? People are still saying “wait and see” but we are quickly approaching a time when that’s not a valid answer anymore. On the bright side even if nobody extra gets the vaccine at least we won‘t have to hear the anti-vaxx crowd call it an experimental vaccine anymore :)

All kidding aside the FDA has nothing to gain by not giving full approval and a lot to lose. If they wait until January in an attempt to appear thorough or cautious people will continue to use the EUA as an excuse not to get it. If some incredibly unlikely event occurs that shows the vaccines are actually unsafe between now and January nobody will give the FDA credit for being extra cautious with their full approve. 192M of us will be furious they told us it was safe. So there is really no upside to waiting. The data is in, it has been analyzed so make the call.

The insurance thing is possible. It would take a little time to setup. A lot of corporate plans have their open enrollment period in the fourth quarter so that’s fast approaching.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom