Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
And why is this a bad thing? If he prefers it, let him be.

Among other things, there are three primary reasons:

I don't have a house keeper so I'd love him to at least wait until he gets near a laundry basket so I don't have to go around the house looking for shorts that were cast aside by my little heathen and tossed in some random direction in the same mindless lord-of-the-flies ritual he preforms nearly daily but never in quite the same way.

It makes it really, really super hard when I had plans to go back out, to get him motivated when he must now put shorts back on.

Lastly, it's a little bit embarrassing when other people come over and he forgets and does it in front of them (like, right in front of them). I know I said younger but we're talking reading age so he's quickly approaching the point where non-family are going to view it as odd rather than cute and being a single dad, that kind of scrutiny is something I worry about.

Don't you worry, though - more often than not, he still does it when it's just the two of us.
 

Kevin_W

Well-Known Member
Thought a few of you may appreciate this :p
Interesting read, thanks.

and yet: https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/03/10/flu-update--CDC estimated that there have been 20,000 deaths related to the flu so far this season.

I think every news article about COVID-19 rates should end with this sentence.
 

ImperfectPixie

Well-Known Member
Among other things, there are three primary reasons:

I don't have a house keeper so I'd love him to at least wait until he gets near a laundry basket so I don't have to go around the house looking for shorts that were cast aside by my little heathen and tossed in some random direction in the same mindless lord-of-the-flies ritual he preforms nearly daily but never in quite the same way.

It makes it really, really super hard when I had plans to go back out, to get him motivated when he must now put shorts back on.

Lastly, it's a little bit embarrassing when other people come over and he forgets and does it in front of them (like, right in front of them). I know I said younger but we're talking reading age so he's quickly approaching the point where non-family are going to view it as odd rather than cute and being a single dad, that kind of scrutiny is something I worry about.

Don't worry, though - more often than not, he still does it when it's just the two of us.
We had a single dad friend of ours give our oldest a little verbal jab about putting pants on when there's company over (we really don't consider him company, and I'm comfortable wearing PJs if he's in the house). It basically worked a miracle and now all I have to do is announce that company is coming over and both boys scramble to put on (at the very least) pants. ;)

He literally just said "DUDE! Put some pants on when you have company!" in a stern dad voice.

ETA: Sometimes it takes someone who isn't one of their parents to say something.
 

Horizons '83

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
But back on topic, I am hearing from my family that their schools are being cancelled for the rest of the school year and I am curious (since this is the Disney related thread) how that will affect the crowds, when WDW does reopen. Will it be insane the first week or will the Summer be brutal with all the cancelled spring break trips?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Speculation since nothing is known and just about every possiblity is up at this point.

I still wonder when the stream changes and things are attempting to reopen for business on the scale of WDW and parks around the world, does anyone else think China Parks will either be left closed(they were dragging the company a good bit because they were operating at an increasing loss every year since opening and have troubles even without the virus) or stay closed longer still since China is still more densely populated and cases are going to flucate more there? I also wonder with WDW what would remain closed the longest? I think the Waterparks would as they are not as big of revenue maker as the theme parks and have seasonal closures/lightning storms anyway, so staffing would not take priority for something that produces less revenue. The water parks and hotel wings closed off is how I see the phased reopening happen, but I am just speculating.
 

orlandogal22

Well-Known Member
n.

But back on topic, I am hearing from my family that their schools are being cancelled for the rest of the school year and I am curious (since this is the Disney related thread) how that will affect the crowds, when WDW does reopen. Will it be insane the first week or will the Summer be brutal with all the cancelled spring break trips?



RE: Schools / Parks. Good question. I'm thinking it may be a little of both. Possibly ramping up with crowds as more people filter in from out of state, but it will be interesting how they handle deciding on disclosing an opening date (and how far out) and how people will scramble to get reservations and / or amend reservations to align with those dates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

GoofGoof

Premium Member
Maybe? Hospitals run on a very thin margin and they are NOT going to invest in majorly expensive equipment to have it unused most of the year-1 no money for it, 2-no space for it 3-there wouldn't be personnel to staff it either.
The government would need to step in to fund this. Maybe FEMA or another agency can keep extra supplies and equipment to be deployed quickly as needed for different issues. They will certainly be beefing up the plans and resources dedicated to testing and isolating people on a mass scale. As far as space they will need to come up with a plan to either quickly convert space to temporary icu rooms or live with a certain number of unused rooms when that’s not practical. For staff, more training to make sure that when something like this happens it’s all hands on deck. There were lots of changes implemented after 9/11 to ensure we are ready for a terrorist attack or chemical/bio weapon attack, in this case it’s a virus but same concept. If it’s mandated by the government and funded by the government it won’t damage the hospital’s bottom line. It’s still way cheaper than the trillion dollar stimulus needed in this case.
 

Patcheslee

Well-Known Member
For now the government has choosen to collapse the US economy which will lead to a bunch of bad stuff, have to ask the question is it really worth it to save 80-90 year olds? Because that is really what this is for, saving the old and feeble out there. How many young peoples lives is it worth destroying to save an 80 year old who will die soon anyways? In my opinion none. You had your time, what happens after that is up to God.

There will be an increase in wife beatings/killings. There will be an increase in robberies/murders etc. There will be an increase in suicides. Funny thing is when you reduce to people to nothing peasants they get violent. It's a loss of hope for anything good to come their way. If this continues for months the rank and file will get violent.
Before you assume 80 year olds look into how many younger people are high risk due to health. My 41yo husband, DD11's 42yo father, are both in that category. Now take into account that losing my husband will result in lose of income permanently, and my kid would be devastated to lose her father. That does not count the 5 of 6 of her grandparents who are in the high risk category all under the age of 70. So in essence the "time" my daughter would have had if any of those were to pass away because of this virus would be taken away from her earlier.
 

thomas998

Well-Known Member
Well, as a percentage of infections, sure. As a flat, hard numerical comparison in the same amount of time, it's definitively far more deadly than H1N1. There were 10 times more confirmed deaths in the first 16 days than with H1N1.
Your numbers are off. They have traced back the first case of coronavirus to November, the first death from it didn't happen until January 9th... so in the first 16 days there were zero deaths, in fact it seems to have taken 2 months before the first death. With the Swine flu (H1N1) the first case was discovered in March 17th 2009, the first death was April 12th 2009... so if you want to compare the two the Swine flu was much faster to kill people... Overall it racked up 12,400 deaths in the US alone over the year it was considered a pandemic. At this time the numbers for the corona virus really aren't anywhere near the place they were with the Swine flu... So when you think about it, why are we going so far over the top with this pandemic compared to the one in 2009? Yes it is deadly, but in the swine flu pandemic we also had no vaccine but didn't go so nutty over it compared to this one.
 

JenniferS

When you're the leader, you don't have to follow.
Italian deaths will probably pass CHINA soon.
And it’s a much smaller country than China.
Just shows you how deadly this can be if unchecked

We’ll never know anywhere near the true numbers from China. Or Iran.
 

"El Gran Magnifico"

Mr Flibble is Very Cross.
1584537047080.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom