Hoping this isn’t considered political, if it is feel free to remove. Just want to share this.
I guess I shouldn’t be surprised but... it certainly shocks me as a Canadian neighbour.
I hope this can be amended so the US is able to share with the rest of the world who also needs vaccines.
Soooo this flags so many things in my brain I may have to take a moment to collect myself. Let me tell all of you how I (and hopefully anyone of you) deal with something like this.
1. Who is the source?
I had never heard of him so I looked him up . I got this:
Eric Liang Feigl-Ding is an American public health scientist who is currently a Senior Fellow at the Federation of American Scientists in Washington DC
Ok that tell me nothing. Especially "
public health scientist" Is that really a job? So who is
Federation of American Scientists I have never heard of them so I look them up based on their political leanings. On a google search I get two main results:
When I look on a fairly center left media checking sight I get:
Overall, we rate The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) a Pro-science source based on sourcing and alignment with the consensus.
When I look at fairly center right media checking sight get:
Federation of American Scientists media bias rating is Lean Very Left.
OK that gets me no where, one thinks they are legit and the other thinks they are biased.
So I go to Vanity Fair, the source of the information, always my favorite science based site. Didn't they used to be lingerie clad models walking the runway and a survey about how to be better in bed ten years ago?
So I check the left center fact check site on Vanity fair and it tells me:
Overall, we rate Vanity Fair Left Biased based on editorial positions that always favor the left and sometimes factual in reporting, due to failed fact checks. Their zeal to spin an article to their liking often finds the results wanting.
Then I check the center right Media Bias site:
Vanity Fair media bias rating is Lean Very Left.
Ok so both sides agree that Vanity Fair is left leaning and an anti Trump story is what they like.
Then I go to current facts as I can see them and stories to back them up:
The United States plans to send roughly 4 million doses of AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine that it is not using to Mexico and Canada in loan deals with the two countries, yielding to requests to share vaccines with allies.
www.reuters.com
The United States will loan millions of doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine — not yet approved for emergency U.S. use — to its closest neighbors.
www.npr.org
Biden administration has come under pressure to share vaccine, which has been authorized in other countries but not yet in US
www.theguardian.com
I did find it interesting that all of the articles said "share or loan" the jabs to those countries and maybe under contracts they couldn't be "sold" I just don't know.
I do know two things:
1. If we announce we were giving all these AZ doses which we do not need to other countries and it fell through because of some deal the Trump administration had made it would be front page on every news source in the US. These articles are three weeks old. and other than Vanity Fair (which I am sure we all consider a better news source than the AP or BBC) we have heard nothing.
2. Just because some posts a tweet or an article to support some thing, unless you 100% trust that source, you need to investigate to see if you do.
Do I think those vials were given, loaned or shared with Mexico and Canada?
Absolutely!!! If not we would have heard of it, and if we couldn't have done it then the current administration would have never announced it.