They might have more success (although probably not much) representing people who bring lawsuits against businesses that don't take available measures to protect them from getting COVID, but I doubt legal considerations are going to drive these decisions. It's more likely to come down to political/social considerations.
That question has a super important qualifier around who "they" is. If "they" is a business (Disney spending more than it makes), towns, counties, or states, then it matters a lot. But, if "they" is the federal government, or more specifically, "an entity that creates the currency", all the rules are different.
Very good read. Puts things into the most simplest terms that anyone should be able to understand.That question has a super important qualifier around who "they" is. If "they" is a business (Disney spending more than it makes), towns, counties, or states, then it matters a lot. But, if "they" is the federal government, or more specifically, "an entity that creates the currency", all the rules are different.
Here's a fun read:
Macroeconomics, money and post-Brexit recovery, all in one Twitter thread
This Twitter thread, published this morning, took about four hours and 40 years of thinking to write... I keep hearing people complain that the ‘mainstream media’ does not understand economics and that we’re talked down to as if everything must be explained as if the economy is a household. In...www.taxresearch.org.uk
This explanation says the spending comes before the taxing. With spending increasing the money sloshing around in the economy and taxing decreasing it. Where inflation is the real measure of if there's to much money sloshing around.
Which is to say, if the economy is running hot, unemployment is low, or that spending is buying the same limited resources as others, it'll drive inflation and be bad. A booming economy is a good time to reduce government spending. Right now, we don't have any of those worries. Which should mean, we can spend wildly, as long as we pull back as the situation changes and the economy starts to support itself. With the government spending to get us through the downturn so it's not so low and then letting up as things swing back up.
I've been waiting to review the official paper on Johnson & Johnson's trial (ENSEMBLE2), so that we're not just going off information from a press release. It seems like they're going to hold it until just before the hearing.The FDA advisory committee JnJ vaccine meeting page for the meeting scheduled in two weeks can be found here: (No JnJ docs yet, but has links for streaming the meeting when it occurs, as well as other information)
VRBPAC February 26, 2021 Meeting Announcement
This is the CBER Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee February 26, 2021 Meeting Announcement.www.fda.gov
Expect documents to show up there when it gets closer to the meeting.
That question has a super important qualifier around who "they" is. If "they" is a business (Disney spending more than it makes), towns, counties, or states, then it matters a lot. But, if "they" is the federal government, or more specifically, "an entity that creates the currency", all the rules are different.
Here's a fun read:
Macroeconomics, money and post-Brexit recovery, all in one Twitter thread
This Twitter thread, published this morning, took about four hours and 40 years of thinking to write... I keep hearing people complain that the ‘mainstream media’ does not understand economics and that we’re talked down to as if everything must be explained as if the economy is a household. In...www.taxresearch.org.uk
This explanation says the spending comes before the taxing. With spending increasing the money sloshing around in the economy and taxing decreasing it. Where inflation is the real measure of if there's to much money sloshing around.
Which is to say, if the economy is running hot, unemployment is low, or that spending is buying the same limited resources as others, it'll drive inflation and be bad. A booming economy is a good time to reduce government spending. Right now, we don't have any of those worries. Which should mean, we can spend wildly, as long as we pull back as the situation changes and the economy starts to support itself. With the government spending to get us through the downturn so it's not so low and then letting up as things swing back up.
Yes, they may delay it until close to the meeting time. From the government point of view here are the deadlines for document publishing to the public:
I or someone else has probably linked the Phase 1/2 paper before (Though they just updated it four days ago, while it was initially published last month). But here it is in case it has not been linked here before:
I’m good, as I just got my medical letter.
jamanetwork.com
Using the Dates of Dec18 (Cherry picked as a high number) and ending on Feb11:
covidtracking.com
Consider the source, facts unfair and unbalancedSometimes it is good to see all sides in politics. The right seeing the left, and left seeing the right. Humor sometimes helps vs a lot of words.
So here is some political right humor: (The first is about Biden vaccines, but honestly I cannot figure out what they consider in his barely started program is a miss). The other political cartoons make more sense(In what they are trying to communicate) to me, but they are not vaccine/covid related.
