Perhaps you're too young to remember the hoopla and cries of inconvenience and extra cost when:On the topic of restrictions vs. quality of life...
If one wanted to get to 0 deaths on the Interstate system, one would enact a speed limit of 20 mph, an age restriction, and a no-passenger policy.
We don't do those things because while a draconian Interstate driving policy would drastically lower Interstate deaths, it would severely damage our economy and way of life, which would indirectly cost us lives in other ways.
We all have our opinions of what those in power should do about the virus. I find it useful to see those decisions as a sliding scale:
Too few restrictions = too many virus cases, deaths, hospital overload
Too many restrictions = economic hardship, addiction, abuse, suicides
- seat belts were required by law
- cars had to have air bags
- cars had to pass federal crash dummy tests
- speed limits were reduced as population density increased
- cars had to pass state inspections for safety
- people fined for not following safety laws
But if you're really going to compare driving accidents to COVID, assume 20-car pileups whose frequency increases geometrically over time... and there are people OK with that. They just want to drive fast with no seat belts.