RobWDW1971
Well-Known Member
This is a legitimate debate with hypotheticals that have never truly been tested in the modern era. I think the right choice is err on the side of economic crash. Economies can be rebuilt. Forcing us into a position where we have to decide who lives and who dies on a daily basis isn’t sustainable or ethical.
But society does it every day - we decide if we are going to keep every patient alive as long as possible, when do you pull the plug on the elderly vs. millions of dollars of care for another day or two, that cars aren't built like tanks to be safe because that's too expensive, etc, etc. We could make all speed limits 25 miles an hour on the freeway and save thousands of lives, but that's not convenient. It is all a balance of weighing acceptable deaths. It's not a pretty thought, but it is just the facts.