GoofGoof
Premium Member
I think that’s our plan B if a vaccine fails to pan out. People talk about what do we do if there is no vaccine, we can’t just keep things closed for years. What you laid out is a way to allow a lot more people to interact normally. It’s the definition of learning to live with the virus. I am hopeful that the saliva tests get better and cheaper over time and it could be possible everyone tests themselves frequently (daily?) if it comes to that.I think the only way to truly get ahead of this (without a vaccine or waiting for it to run its course) is constant testing with fast results. That’s going to require the tests to be free, require the capacity to produce billions of tests a week, require something less intrusive than sticking a long q-tip up people’s noses, and most importantly require hundreds of new labs so that those tests can be processed in hours rather than days.
We‘ve faced much more dangerous viruses before, the main reason this one is so problematic is because most infected people dont even know they have it, this allows them to pass it along without ever knowing they were sick, even those who get symptoms will pass it for days before the first symptom shows. If it were a more dangerous virus it would be easier to deal with because we could easily identify sick people without a test.
Even with a 99% survival rate it can be more deadly than a more lethal virus simply based on the fact it’ll eventually find all of the 1% who can’t fight it if we can’t find a way to stop it.