Rumors are just that...rumors. FP+ may not come back (unlikely given the money invested), it may come back different than before or it may come back exactly the same. I don’t think anyone knows for sure, even senior management at Disney. It’s been rumored since FP + was rolled out that it would become a paid service but that hasn’t happened so far. I’m not saying it won’t happen just that it’s not a given either right now.
Just to clarify, the disclaimer was not aimed at you in any way. You've been a pretty calm head throughout this discussion.
I know this won’t be a popular opinion, but I’d like to see fast passes offered to just Disney Resort guests. Something similar to what Universal does.
I think we agree then? Shocking I know.
ha
I always thought they would go that way. Offering 30 extra days to book didn’t seem like a great incentive to stay on site but making it exclusive would. I guess they were trying to keep everyone happy. I’d actually think the best way to do it would be to offer resort guests 60 days advance, but make less availability up front then offer additional reservations that open up the day of visit to everyone similar to max pass at DLR. Then you solve the issue with AP holders and also allow everyone a shot at waiting until the day of to decide what park to visit without missing out on FP reservations. At the same time it gives resort guests a huge advantage possibly worth paying more for.
Especially since the “missing” documentation is the way one would know a death is misattributed, the death certificate. Funny how these stories rely on both having and not having the same damning evidence.
The allegation of a suicide being attributed to a respiratory disease isn’t just a difference of interpretation, it is outright fraud and malpractice. The this the garbage message employed by denier, not just regarding the pandemic but we also see it with things like vaccines. They couch in seemingly acceptable terms but they use it to justify an extreme case, the whole point being to discredit well studied, well established norms of medicine.
(alleged)? Really? You are free to believe whatever you want but "alleged" is defined as "without proof". If you believe this worldwide viral illness is without proof, please go ahead and believe that. Does that make the (alleged) bubonic plague, the 1918 (alleged) Spanish flu, the (alleged) ebola, and other widespread viral infections also without proof? There seems to be proof of the current virus that has, to most observers, infected over 8 million people and spread to (at last count) 6 of the 7 continents on this planet. If you wish to ignore this proof, you are free to do so, however ill-advised that may be, but to call this an alleged pandemic requires everyone to likewise ignore this proof and believe as you do that this is all made-up without proof otherwise. However, no disclaimer is need to, nor can it ever, soften your beliefs. Too many have died from this "alleged" virus to make it meaningful for you to tack a hollow disclaimer on your dismissal of their deaths and the pain of those who have lost loved ones.
I didn't say covid was alleged. I said the pandemic was alleged. The common cold can infect up towards 1 billion people per year. And what does the media primarily focus on? Positives cases, not deaths.
Legitimate is the key. A mistake is a mistake and like we talked about extensively there’s some grey areas particularly with co-morbidities but there’s a big difference between legitimate errors in counting or judgement calls and a widespread conspiracy to inflate the death count. This discussion all started with an allegation that it’s widespread that hospitals are falsifying death records to get extra Covid payments from the government. I’m sure there’s some errors going both ways, there‘s also a possibility some doctor somewhere was overstating Covid deaths whether for personal financial gain or political beliefs. What I don’t find credible is the conspiracy theory that the over-reporting is widespread and therefore the numbers are exaggerated and our response an overreaction. As I said a while back in an extreme example if 10% of Covid deaths were incorrectly reported (overstated) there are still over 200K Americans dead...it doesn’t really move the needle. I don’t buy into this ”gotcha“ mentality where if you find one discrepancy (like the motor cycle accident story quoted frequently)that’s proof that the numbers are materially wrong.
No, they don't. Go look up the average number of flu deaths in a year on the CDC website...~40,000 for an entire year. We've lost 220,000 to COVID in less than 8 months.
At this point you are either willfully ignorant or just lying. I’m sorry you’re so scared and don’t want to face the reality of the situation.
www.cdc.gov
We are in a pandemic and it is not "alleged". One frequently used definition of a pandemic is a disease or illness that is prevalent in a country or the world. One definition of prevalent talks about it being widespread. One definition of widespread is found or disstributed over a large area or number of people. Which of these definitions do not apply to the covid virus? Which is there not enough proof to remove the "alleged" pejorative in your prior post? But go ahead and believe otherwise.
I liked maxpass at DLR and since we were only there for a few days and I don’t know when we will be back I wanted to get to do as much as possible. I’m not sure if I was a more regular visitor to DLR that I would buy it. That may be because it was a lighter crowd time when I visited too. They don’t need the FP kiosks to go to a maxpass system, they could make it pay or use standby lines.
