Coronavirus and Walt Disney World general discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I'm afraid we can't wait for empirical studies to implement measures. There are ethical principles that prevent scientists from deliberately exposing people to the virus. Ideally you'd have 1000 people in a space, some of them infected, and then measure different amounts of masks, different types of masks, different distances, different numbers of infected people at different stages, different air quality, different participant ages, genders, pre-existing conditions, etc., and then see who got infected and who didn't. We'd learn a lot that way and get great data, and could make precise recommendations. But it's not allowed (obviously), so we have to do things like put screens up between hamsters, measure droplets, or just use observational data.

Right now it seems that staying farther apart, being outside, and wearing masks help to prevent the spread. It also makes logical sense (e.g., how will you infect me from 100 ft away on a windy day?). But we can't blame scientists or policy-makers for not having better data on exact effectiveness of measures. There's nothing that can be done about that.
I’ve heard “fauci doesn’t know what he’s talking about” being used in recent weeks for people being spoiled, selfish, and ultimately genetically stupid.

He doesn’t know how everything will move...that’s why it’s rolling based on data collection. He didn’t build the damn virus. It’s not a Toyota.

But the real problem is what the US was never going to show: patience and sacrifice.

It’s required and it’s not there. The fact that the WW2 generation is gone has never been more evident than 2020. The generations since have been spoiled...with amplification.
 

hopemax

Well-Known Member
In all fairness, though, there isn't much evidence in general as to how this virus behaves. The government and its agencies have to make decisions based on incomplete data, so they will likely err on the side of caution. I'm giving them a break on this one. But when evidence does become available, I hope it will be analyzed to see if changes can be made.
The thing is, within the epidemiology community, if you read their blogs, Twitter, etc the general consensus of "are masks useful?" was settled during SARS and MERS. Which is why they have been confused by the WHO and CDC recommendations. Which is why Asia went straight to masks. The community thinks there are far more important and necessary studies the epi and virology communities need to be doing than proving to obstinate Americans that masks are the way to go.
 

legwand77

Well-Known Member
I agree with you on many things, this isn't one.

Read this article and it has a link to all the evidence you want on how effective masks are including the studies the recommendations were based on.


Also, a quick google search on how Japan and Thailand smashed this thing is primarily because of the use of masks.

Also none of those sources listed in that article are about the effectiveness of cloth masks, they are only about detailed the risk of presymptomatic or asymptomatic transmission not about cloth mask effectiveness.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
The thing is, within the epidemiology community, if you read their blogs, Twitter, etc the general consensus of "are masks useful?" was settled during SARS and MERS. Which is why they have been confused by the WHO and CDC recommendations. Which is why Asia went straight to masks. The community thinks there are far more important and necessary studies the epi and virology communities need to be doing than proving to obstinate Americans that masks are the way to go.
I'm against being too critical of our government during this time, but it may have helped if we hadn't been told at the outset that this was no worse than the flu and that masks were not effective and not recommended. This was against a backdrop of pictures of healthcare workers treating patients in negative pressure rooms while wearing head to toe protective gear and pictures of Chinese, Italians and South Koreans all wearing masks. We're playing catch up.
 
Last edited:

DisneyDebRob

Well-Known Member
Where's our task force? Why can't we know what patterns they see in cases and transmission? If bars are the problem in Florida, work on that. Manufacturing, nursing homes, etc. We have been left in complete darkness about what they are observing about the virus. We should all be united in wanting to know what they've been up to these past few weeks. They know something. They interview those who become infected and can often trace things back. Let us know what you know so we can understand. Otherwise it feels like drive-by fear when there's usually much more going on that they could discuss.
It was taken off the air 40 some days ago.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I'm against being too critical of our government during this time, but it may have helped if we hadn't been told at the outset that this was no worse than the flu and that masks were not effective and not recommended. This was against a backdrop of pictures of healthcare workers treating patients in negative pressure rooms while wearing head to toe protective gear and pictures of Asians, Italians and South Koreans all wearing masks. We're playing catch up.
Even that isn’t quite the reversal people claim. Telling people not to wear masks was about protecting oneself and preventing a run on equipment. That remains true. At that same time even Dr. Fauci was saying those who are feeling ill should wear a mask to prevent spread. What actually changed is who is thought to be contagious.
 

legwand77

Well-Known Member
Can you link those for me? I'd like to read them. I believe the WHO is now aligned with the CDC guidance on masks as well.

From the revised June 5th WHO guidance , after when they got a lot of flack for saying masks weren't needed.

At present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID-19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332293/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.4-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

They still recommend but based on no real evidence

and from the cdc

note under filtration.

I personally don't care either way if people wear a mask or not, it is just interesting it is based on no real evidence
 
Last edited:

mickeymiss

Well-Known Member
Even that isn’t quite the reversal people claim. Telling people not to wear masks was about protecting oneself and preventing a run on equipment. That remains true. At that same time even Dr. Fauci was saying those who are feeling ill should wear a mask to prevent spread. What actually changed is who is thought to be contagious.
I still strongly suspect asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic people are more likely to infect a really really close contact than a stranger on the bus, for example. Maybe I'll be wrong but that's what I believe and none of the experts seem interested in talking to the public anymore.
 

DisneyDebRob

Well-Known Member
I'm not even sure who that celebrity could be. Anyone old, like Betty White, "would have died anyway." Too many others will be rated on their political advocacy. Tom Hanks was a possibility, but he's already recovered. It would have to be someone associated with the values of the people who won't wear masks or social distance. But many of those people will be granted access to the best medical practices, like Boris Johnson had.
Hey! Leave my girl Betty out of this. A National treasure right there.
 

TrojanUSC

Well-Known Member
This is the most amazing part, the government ruling/guidance is based on no actual evidence.

Meanwhile, back in the world of science and data:

 

legwand77

Well-Known Member
Meanwhile, back in the world of science and data:

I am sorry, that "article" reference is the Daily Mail leads off with "According to Daily Mail", quite the opposite of science and data , but click bait and whatever. There is no data in it. Might as well get your science from supermarket tabloid. Plus it is 2 months old
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I still strongly suspect asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic people are more likely to infect a really really close contact than a stranger on the bus, for example. Maybe I'll be wrong but that's what I believe and none of the experts seem interested in talking to the public anymore.
Yeah... You’re more likely to be less vigilant and have close, prolonged interactions with someone you know well.
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
I understand but this is also part of living in a free country. I'm in a very restricted state that has had low case counts. Masks can't be enforced here or anywhere. It comes down to making our own risk assessments. Whatever they are doing at grocery stores seems to be working well despite varying mask compliance. I think distancing and basic practical caution is as important as the masks.

This would be a lot simpler if it was just a question of personal risk, but but your choices impact others as well as yourself.
 

Chomama

Well-Known Member
I am not a political person. I don’t comment much here either. I just don’t understand what is hard to understand about masks. This is a photo of what happens for anyone that doesn’t understand. It isn’t complicated and if for some reason you still don’t want to wear one, please stay home. I say that not out of anger or spite. It’s just very frustrating to watch others argue about this over and over. If it only Slows the Spread 20% that makes a difference.
 

Attachments

  • CB3E70CD-256F-42A4-AE4D-D5498CF77D57.jpeg
    CB3E70CD-256F-42A4-AE4D-D5498CF77D57.jpeg
    65.7 KB · Views: 122
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom