rushtest4echo
Well-Known Member
It's cheaper to build 2-4 stories than a 20 story building. If they built Pop and All Stars as towers they would not be value resorts. If land is available and cheap then build low otherwise you have to build high. There are other considerations but in general.
I'd assume in Florida with the lack of earthquake codes that going taller is likely cheaper than most other cases- though I'm sure you're right and that it is more expensive overall for construction costs. However, landscaping, bus service, elevators, parking, roads, security, housekeeping, power, plumping, weatherproofing, roofing and other maintenance things are much more costly when spread out the way that many Disney resorts are. I'm positive that room for room, something like Grand Floridian's DVC tower is cheaper to operate for 20 years than something at CBR once all costs are factored in. Which is funny, considering the pricing/profit margins between them.
I'd be interest to see any hard numbers on this though. If it's truly more expensive to go vertical (when all costs are factored), why are they doing this now in an era of cost cutting at every corner?