Cliff Racer
Member
CoP, though I love it, is hokey and "middle-American", things that Apple actively trys to distance itself from in its advertising.
I too, thought Apple would be a great fit for Imagination, but then I remembered that HP is a sponsor in Future World already. Usually Disney doesn't pit sponsors of similar products against each other.I think if Apple got involved anywhere, it should be Imagination Pav. And I don't see that happening unless Disney lets Apple come at it with a bull dozer first.
I too, thought Apple would be a great fit for Imagination, but then I remembered that HP is a sponsor in Future World already. Usually Disney doesn't pit sponsors of similar products against each other.
Like you said.....back in the day, there was talk that Mt Fuji didn't come to the Japan pavilion because of their agreements with Kodak.Or they can't under contract...
Just listening to the DIS podcast- they're talking about Disney Springs and saying that Apple is on the list of stores to build...
Why hasn't Apple sponsored CoP yet? Disney/Jobs --> huge connection; attraction desperately needs some tech updating...
Seems pretty logical to me.
I hope you're not comparing Walt to Steve Jobs, because they are completely different.
Apple doesn't really innovate anything anymore. Sure it could be argued they started the smart phone craze but since then they've just gone downhill. They don't know how to innovate anymore to be honest, just how to market.
Good thing I'm behind a keyboard and can't get hit by the poo that might be flung at me for saying this but
I think CoP should just close up shop and be moved to the Smithsonian.
I love, repeate LOVE the CoP, but I just don't see it ever getting the love it deserves to bring it back to glory. It's a museum piece, so I think it's time to move it to an actual museum. Let it stand as a historical attraction, reinstate some version of the "original" last scene, and hike it up to DC.
Tell me, does it get boring living under a rock?That's an incredibly interesting statement. Particularly because, skipping over your bizarre non-innovation claim, the most inaccurate part of your post is that they know how to market. One of their biggest weaknesses in the Cook era has been their advertising.
Tell me, does it get boring living under a rock?
There's a reason every second person owns some sort of apple product. Why do you think hundreds of thousands line up outside apple stores to get the new "revolutionary" iPhone year when all they are getting is a thinner and slightly faster device. It's because Apple are marketing geniuses. Everytime I see those ads on TV for iPad it makes me want to go buy one (again).
Even if the latest marketing might not be as great as the Jobs era, Tim Cook is still doing alright.[/quote
Part of the reason is that we are actually very dumb and want the next best thing all the time. Minimum advertising can do that. People got in line for the next I thing and do not know what is included they just know it is "better".
Tell me, does it get boring living under a rock?
There's a reason every second person owns some sort of apple product. Why do you think hundreds of thousands line up outside apple stores to get the new "revolutionary" iPhone year when all they are getting is a thinner and slightly faster device. It's because Apple are marketing geniuses. Everytime I see those ads on TV for iPad it makes me want to go buy one (again).
Even if the latest marketing might not be as great as the Jobs era, Tim Cook is still doing alright.
I haven't. But advertising isn't something you have to work in to know wether it's good or bad. That's like saying I can't compare movies I have seen because I was never a director.The reason people line up for Apple products is because Apple is innovative. They've created products and a related ecosystem that doesn't easily lose customers. Once people buy an Apple product, they very rarely leave for another product family. Has little to do with their advertising. Has everything to do with software and hardware that is intuitive (something few of their rivals can claim) and clean.
Do a quick study of their advertising in the past few years - why not start with the famed Apple Genius ads - and let me know if you think that compares with any of the advertising that was common during Steve Jobs' lifetime. That particular campaign was pulled early; TBWA wouldn't even release production credits for those commercials. (Not an easy sell in a rather ego-driven advertising industry) Not exactly a marketing coup.
Incidentally, how long have you worked in advertising?
I haven't. But advertising isn't something you have to work in to know wether it's good or bad. That's like saying I can't compare movies I have seen because I was never a director.
Give me a list of anything that Apple has innovated since the release of iPhone, I dare you. They're not innovators, they just take technologies that haven't popularized and use their marketing skills to turn them mainstream.
So you tell me I wouldn't know because I don't work on marketing, then you admit you don't either? lol.I'm not saying you can't have an opinion on advertising because you don't work in it - I am saying that there are people who know advertising (and I'm not one of those people) very well who disagree with you. I don't know much about painting, but I'd be inclined to trust Picasso's opinion on the subject, right?
They've innovated the iPhone. A few iMacs. The MacBook Pro. The MacBook Air. The iPad. The iPad Mini. Apple TV. iTunes. iCloud. Software. The list goes on.
Innovation doesn't have to be the invention of a brand new product. Innovation can be, and usually is, small. Wheels have been essentially the same for a very long time. Tire companies still make improvements, though, and we all are better for it.
Innovation need not be limited to just the base technology. Just look at the number of companies copying Apple's design language. Or how many PC companies now offer all-in-one desktops that also resemble the iMac. If you change people's expectations of a product, then you must have done something.So you tell me I wouldn't know because I don't work on marketing, then you admit you don't either? lol.
Everything you listed was not an innovation. They were simply new products using the same tech as lesser known products. The last thing apple innovated, the iPod. And even that was borrowing off MP3 players.
Sure, some companies innovate things to improve them, but when do we ever care about that? Most of the time it's things changing something that already works as well as borrowing off other products.
Yeh Apple should be celebrated for what they did with smartphones, but they don't deserve the credit they get from people like yourself.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.