Construction between Contemporary and TTC

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
That is just one example. There are several conditions that can cause negative skin friction.
But we’re talking about conditions so extreme that one single pile was so quickly and thoroughly sucked into the void that there is no longer evidence of its placement. And despite this Disney went back to the site and the Reedy Creek Improvement District for whatever reason lied to the state about this ground condition.
 

Master Yoda

Pro Star Wars geek.
Premium Member
But we’re talking about conditions so extreme that one single pile was so quickly and thoroughly sucked into the void that there is no longer evidence of its placement. And despite this Disney went back to the site and the Reedy Creek Improvement District for whatever reason lied to the state about this ground condition.
Where are you getting that they lied to the state about the ground condition?
 

bpiper

Well-Known Member
The state required RCID 2020 Comprehensive Plan listed the site as “Suitable” for building. Images were posted earlier in the thread.
Your confusing "Suitable" with "It costs so much that we won't make our 500% profit margin" if we built something. Both can be true.

Remember, in the Bob's era, if they don't make a gigantic profit on something, they don't do it.

I am wondering if the site was originally a sink hole and that when Seven Seas Lagoon was dug out, they dumped excess into the sinkhole filling it up, but not properly filling it up so that it could easily (Cheaply) support a foundation. Maybe the additional cost would be to excavate the hole and properly fill it back up so that it could support a weight.

There are other locations on property where you can see there is a sinkhole but Disney built around it instead of dealing with it. Look at Google images of Kidani. There is a sinkhole just to the west of the main entrance. I think the odd placement of Kidani and its amenities, is because of that. I think because of that sinkhole they had to do underbuilding parking instead of using a parking lot like Jambo.
 

dsinclair

Active Member
There are other locations on property where you can see there is a sinkhole but Disney built around it instead of dealing with it. Look at Google images of Kidani. There is a sinkhole just to the west of the main entrance. I think the odd placement of Kidani and its amenities, is because of that. I think because of that sinkhole they had to do underbuilding parking instead of using a parking lot like Jambo.
Is it the spot circled in red?
Screen Shot 2021-07-07 at 2.48.02 PM.png
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
For reference:


There was also a post recently hinting that the 2020 plan was coming out soon.
 

Ripken10

Well-Known Member
So am I the only one hoping for the hotel here just so one day I might be able to walk (or run) around the entire seven seas lagoon (safely)...

Ok, I also want most of these resort ideas built too so I could stay there.
 

Soluna16

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Is it the spot circled in red?
View attachment 570255

As I stated before I can attest to this as I am a Geologist in Orange and Seminole counties. Basically all the area you see here in dark colors is Sinkhole. It's fairly common on the Disney property (and this whole area). The WDW property has something like 300+ registered sinkholes.
 

GimpYancIent

Well-Known Member
As I stated before I can attest to this as I am a Geologist in Orange and Seminole counties. Basically all the area you see here in dark colors is Sinkhole. It's fairly common on the Disney property (and this whole area). The WDW property has something like 300+ registered sinkholes.
So to the meat and potatoes question, is the specific property being discussed between the Contemporary and TTC one of those registered sinkhole areas?
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Your confusing "Suitable" with "It costs so much that we won't make our 500% profit margin" if we built something. Both can be true.

Remember, in the Bob's era, if they don't make a gigantic profit on something, they don't do it.

I am wondering if the site was originally a sink hole and that when Seven Seas Lagoon was dug out, they dumped excess into the sinkhole filling it up, but not properly filling it up so that it could easily (Cheaply) support a foundation. Maybe the additional cost would be to excavate the hole and properly fill it back up so that it could support a weight.

There are other locations on property where you can see there is a sinkhole but Disney built around it instead of dealing with it. Look at Google images of Kidani. There is a sinkhole just to the west of the main entrance. I think the odd placement of Kidani and its amenities, is because of that. I think because of that sinkhole they had to do underbuilding parking instead of using a parking lot like Jambo.
The idea of land being suitable but expensive makes no sense. What makes the foundations more expensive is the suitability of the land.

Multiple projects to develop the site died before either Bob was ever part of the Company.

Again, the idea that both RCID and the former Vice President of Resort Development, who is an architect that worked on multiple projects for the site, are somehow completely unaware of the extreme conditions in this site (which a story told about multiple locations) strains credulity. A geotechnical analysis is a basic, typically early, part of building design and it’s going to be done even earlier if their are reports of problems with the site.
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
As I stated before I can attest to this as I am a Geologist in Orange and Seminole counties. Basically all the area you see here in dark colors is Sinkhole. It's fairly common on the Disney property (and this whole area). The WDW property has something like 300+ registered sinkholes.
Where can I go to see if a suspected sinkhole is registered? Do you need geo coordinates?
 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
If GF=Main street, Poly=Adventureland, WL=Frontierland, Cont=Tomorrowland .... then we just need a fantasyland.
Something along the lines of Hôtel Barrière le Normandy Deauville... a bit of french seaside architecture, and Bob can have his Beauty and the Beast bar and IP rooms there instead! win-win!

Basically a Magic Kingdom-y take on the Beach Club.
View attachment 570162
Based on recent form, I suspect something like this is what we would be seeing over the Seven Seas Lagoon if they built a hotel to tie in with Fantasyland:

europe.jpg
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
As I stated before I can attest to this as I am a Geologist in Orange and Seminole counties. Basically all the area you see here in dark colors is Sinkhole. It's fairly common on the Disney property (and this whole area). The WDW property has something like 300+ registered sinkholes.
Thanks for the info.

Is there a public document/website where these registered sinkholes are listed with their locations?
 

Soluna16

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Thanks for the info.

Is there a public document/website where these registered sinkholes are listed with their locations?

The FDEP Subsidence Reports database will get you ones that were registered as having formed recently. There's so many that I don't think all exist in one database but this is the best one for ones considered recently active.


Here's a fairly good map of ones considered hazardous to construction.

f11148.jpg
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom