Connections Cafe and Eatery

Vinnie Mac

Well-Known Member
Having lunch at Connections Cafe and Eatery right now and Epcot fans will be pleased to know that the background music includes a rendition of Celebrate the Future Hand in Hand from the Millennium Celebration alongside other Epcot themes I couldn’t make out. This doesnt mean that’s the entire background music playlist plenty of it is full of generic upbeat tunes that are nice enough.

Side note the Curry Spice Pizza is delish definitely recommend! The overall ambience is rather nice too with plenty of natural light and colors, the giant mural is also very well done, and the light fixtures in particular are great
Isn't We Go On in the loop somewhere as well?

Also, Communicore being exposed to more natural light was a great decision
 

Vinnie Mac

Well-Known Member
The more I'm thinking about this, the more I think this actually may be a huge example of how far awry Epcot went. And, it's a little frustrating for Disney to be hyping this as if they did some masterful thing. They created the problem!

I still think this is a little generic. But, several people have pointed out other great examples of how this is used successfully (the Expo from @Communicora being a particularly good one). My concern here is (ironically) this NOT being more timeless, more Disney, etc. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind this would look horribly dated in 10 years (let alone 20). Just like a hotel lobby, modern spaces should be refreshed no more than every 10 years. And, these spaces seemed to be designed to allow for that.

My issue is Disney has proven they will let spaces sit in Epcot for 20+ years without an update. And, they then pat themselves on the back for doing this innovative transformation. Stargate lasted 12 years and was viewed as long in the tooth then. Electric Umbrella was there OVER 25 YEARS (1994).

The reason I think I'm irritated is because, had these spaces (and all of Epcot) been given attention, we wouldn't have needed all this. And, I bet we wouldn't need to be totally abandoning Epcot's central themes because "popular". Again, I actually think this new space works pretty well for what it is and aligns to Epcot. But, I refuse to give Disney any praise for this great update when it was something 15 years too late. And, with no indication they will learn from those past mistakes.
Part of me feels like there are solutions but not a one size fits all solution. It's hard to maintain a theme park about the future when the future is constantly changing (especially nowadays). I have plenty of ideas about EPCOT but I'm not yet an imagineer or in a corporate position so hey, what can I do about it lol.

I hate to say it but maybe WS should be the main focus of EPCOT. CORE Human culture doesn't really change all that much in a 15-20 year period (which I guess would be the average lifespan of any "era" of EPCOT").


With all this being said though I am excited about the current vision for EPCOT. I think it'll remain an appropriate era for the park coming into the 2030's.
 
Last edited:

Vacationeer

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Epcot‘s finally starting to look exciting again. It was hobbled with construction during our last few trips. I remember when HS felt like that for a looonng time after all the 2016 demolition. Now we love HS again and hopefully we’ll feel the major changes going on at Epcot are worth it as well. Can’t wait for our next visit in the fall.

Any chance that Epcot will be doing something special for their 40th anniversary in October?
 

ctrlaltdel

Well-Known Member
Epcot‘s finally starting to look exciting again. It was hobbled with construction during our last few trips. I remember when HS felt like that for a looonng time after all the 2016 demolition. Now we love HS again and hopefully we’ll feel the major changes going on at Epcot are worth it as well. Can’t wait for our next visit in the fall.

Any chance that Epcot will be doing something special for their 40th anniversary in October?
I’m sure there will be festivities. Hopefully Journey of Water and (maybe?) the rest of the spine will be completed by then but that seems it could easily fall into 2023.
 

Vacationeer

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
I’m sure there will be festivities. Hopefully Journey of Water and (maybe?) the rest of the spine will be completed by then but that seems it could easily fall into 2023.
That would work okay. It’ll be great not dealing the dark gloomy labyrinth of walls.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
My one gripe with this is that its very clear that there came to be a point with this project where they realized that they still had space left and just decided to fill it with even more seating. I'm not sure of what else should have been used to fill the space (maybe another dining venue? a dessert stand perhaps? a stage for entertainment?), but there is no way the restaurant comes close to filling that dining room. Maybe if (hopefully when) Sunshine Seasons has to be taken out of commission for a refurb then it gets used more?
A Disney restaurant with too much seating? I'm ok with that.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
There was a single parks blog article about it. You’re making up this over-promotion by Disney.
PR extends beyond the Disney Parks Blog - which has at least 2 articles dedicated to Connections - and every single one features the excessive, overwrought language that I called BS. If it's "just a basic quickservice" that's fine, but then this is an inordinate amount of lip service to give such a nothing-burger of a space:


















Not especially becoming of you to say I'm making things up just because you don't seem to understand what I'm referring to.
 

jasminethecat

Well-Known Member
PR extends beyond the Disney Parks Blog - which has at least 2 articles dedicated to Connections - and every single one features the excessive, overwrought language that I called BS. If it's "just a basic quickservice" that's fine, but then this is an inordinate amount of lip service to give such a nothing-burger of a space:


















Not especially becoming of you to say I'm making things up just because you don't seem to understand what I'm referring to.


"nothing-burger of a space"? Surely you don't mean to imply that this restaurant which will serve meatball pizza AND pepperoni pizza, not to mention a "french bistro burger" which would be difficult to replicate unless you went to a Wendy's or Burger King.

I looked at the hype, and this line stood out in particular to me. "What makes it unique is it gets its inspiration from the delicious cuisines from across the globe." Really? A restaurant at WDW, at EPCOT no less, which gets inspiration for its cuisine from across the globe?
1651026650112.png
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
I honestly don't see the issue here and am not sure how they can win. Some are hammering this quick service restaurant for not being an amazing experience that looks like nowhere else on planet Earth, while others are complaining that they have gone overboard in trying to build up a simple quick service restaurant as something it's not.

In terms of this explanation, sure, it's full of hyperbole as Disney PR almost always is. However, it's not really that disconnected from what they built. They did put a mural around the place showing people from different cultures around the world cultivating and eating food, a little museum of coffee implements from different times and place, and whatever that rolling pin display is supposed to be. The show kitchens do let guests watch food being prepared, and the windows do provide rather lovely views of the gardens outside.

They have to come up with some concept to guide the design, and in this case they seem to have come up with a decent one that you can detect in the space if you look for it but probably goes over the heads of most guests. It also gives the place a name that makes sense and harmonizes with Creations next-door.

I much prefer this kind of 'backstory' that is more conceptual than literal to all the fan fiction they are writing about supposed owners of stores, their families, and friends in other parks. This seems more like the Disney of old than the other type of laboured backstory that modern Imagineers seem to love.
I explained already how they can "win" - if you're designing a space that won't feature an exceptional function, then at least give it an exceptional form. Would anybody here really call the interior of Connections an exceptional space? I've passed through several dozen like it without ever meaning to.

Either make something amazing and unique to hype up, or don't hype it up so much. Seems pretty simple. The restaurant is B A S I C, with a capital B. While I think that's a lousy option to choose, it is an option . . . but if you're picking it then you should know better than to oversell that project.

For the record, I definitely agree with you about the "fan fiction" backstories. If I ever have to hear about Barnabas T. Bullion or Gustav Tinkerschmidt again it'll be too soon. Characters that have no meaningful presence, impact, or root in the experience, that merely cling to the top of it like a film someone forgot to scrub. I'm glad there's no purported "proprietor" "C. O. NnEctions" that we have to hear about but never see, adding no meat to the experience here.

But the lack of that doesn't make Connections some sort of conceptual beacon. The concept is "It's a restaurant with a sleek design, because that's what #EPCOT is, right?", and beyond that it doesn't go any deeper than . . . I'll say it again . . . an Airport Terminal Cafeteria. The only thing they do different here is branding it with EPCOT Logos and old Blueprints.

Remove those and there's nothing left in its actual bones that says "You're in EPCOT, and that's a cool place to be".
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
PR extends beyond the Disney Parks Blog - which has at least 2 articles dedicated to Connections - and every single one features the excessive, overwrought language that I called BS. If it's "just a basic quickservice" that's fine, but then this is an inordinate amount of lip service to give such a nothing-burger of a space:


















Not especially becoming of you to say I'm making things up just because you don't seem to understand what I'm referring to.

You say PR extends beyond the parks blog, but then every single one of your examples is from Zach’s IG. He’s an imagineer so of course he’s going to pour over design, and that’s only to his relatively small and niche following. People seeing Zach’s stuff are people already following this closely.

There hasn’t been a single post on any of Disney’s actual social media, no media previews, etc. But I stand corrected, there have been two parks blog articles. But that’s pretty typical stuff for any quick service opening, there’s nothing new here.

Oh and I realize my original reply was slightly rude and I’m sorry about that.
 
Last edited:

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Remove those and there's nothing left in its actual bones that says "You're in EPCOT, and that's a cool place to be".

I agree with everything you posted -- I just believe Stargate, Centorium, MouseGear, and Electric Umbrella all had the same issue and thus it's not a departure from the spaces that served a similar function in earlier eras.

That doesn't mean they couldn't have done better this time, of course. It's just that I don't see it as a decline the way so many other things in the park are.
 

wdwgreek

Well-Known Member
I have a split mind on this. From one perspective, I hear the folks saying that this is uninspired or akin to nice high school cafeteria. I also feel from looking at the videos and pictures that this is a super clean and trendy space that I'm genuinely looking forward to experiencing. I found electric umbrella horribly date and drab, I find the modern ascetics of this space plus the new store and club cool to be very exciting and fresh. Is it epcot unique no? Will it age poorly, probably. In the moment do I see it as refreshing and modern. Yes.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
You say PR extends beyond the parks blog, but then every single one of your examples is from Zach’s IG. He’s an imagineer so of course he’s going to pour over design, and that’s only to his relatively small and niche following. People seeing Zach’s stuff are people already following this closely.

There hasn’t been a single post on any of Disney’s actual social media, no media previews, etc. But I stand corrected, there have been two parks blog articles. But that’s pretty typical stuff for any quick service opening, there’s nothing new here.

Oh and I realize my original reply was slightly rude and I’m sorry about that.
Consider how many websites, like this one and beyond (I've got a bevy of links but not sure which of them are permitted to be shared here - a quick Google of Connections Cafe will bring many of them up) report on each of those posts and spread the word to Disney fans of all levels.

That's the intended purpose of the IG posts - to reach Zach's 45,000 Instagram followers, yes, but also to generate headlines far across the fanscape. And it works, which is why this thread is on page 54 for a restaurant that doesn't even open until tomorrow. We've been talking about it for months.

Also, I appreciate your apology and would like to offer my own - My response was somewhat curt as well.
 

Vinnie Mac

Well-Known Member
I explained already how they can "win" - if you're designing a space that won't feature an exceptional function, then at least give it an exceptional form. Would anybody here really call the interior of Connections an exceptional space? I've passed through several dozen like it without ever meaning to.

Either make something amazing and unique to hype up, or don't hype it up so much. Seems pretty simple. The restaurant is B A S I C, with a capital B. While I think that's a lousy option to choose, it is an option . . . but if you're picking it then you should know better than to oversell that project.

For the record, I definitely agree with you about the "fan fiction" backstories. If I ever have to hear about Barnabas T. Bullion or Gustav Tinkerschmidt again it'll be too soon. Characters that have no meaningful presence, impact, or root in the experience, that merely cling to the top of it like a film someone forgot to scrub. I'm glad there's no purported "proprietor" "C. O. NnEctions" that we have to hear about but never see, adding no meat to the experience here.

But the lack of that doesn't make Connections some sort of conceptual beacon. The concept is "It's a restaurant with a sleek design, because that's what #EPCOT is, right?", and beyond that it doesn't go any deeper than . . . I'll say it again . . . an Airport Terminal Cafeteria. The only thing they do different here is branding it with EPCOT Logos and old Blueprints.

Remove those and there's nothing left in its actual bones that says "You're in EPCOT, and that's a cool place to be".
I feel like you're the type of guy to look at Electric Umbrella and say "but it had personality!"
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
I agree with everything you posted -- I just believe Stargate, Centorium, MouseGear, and Electric Umbrella all had the same issue and thus it's not a departure from the spaces that served a similar function in earlier eras.

That doesn't mean they couldn't have done better this time, of course. It's just that I don't see it as a decline the way so many other things in the park are.
Stargate and Centorium at least had going for them that the entire CommuniCore structure was conceived around the shared presence of those dining and shopping options, along with the CC Exhibits themselves - they weren't slotted into an empty venue, the venue was conceptually founded on housing those specific shopping and dining options. It wasn't "and whatever restaurant and shopping we think of can go here" - the CommuniCore building wasn't an empty husk waiting for tenants. The building was designed to hold Stargate and Centorium, and the architecture and planning reflected the functions of those specific spaces in its design.

MouseGear and Electric Umbrella negated much of the form and function of these spaces the same way Innoventions did - that entire reconception botched the central plaza buildings and their value to the EPCOT guest experience, which was higher pre 1994 than it has been at any time since.

The decline was 28 years ago, so it's understandable that not everyone remembers it. And it is true that Stargate and Centorium weren't, like, E-Ticket options within the park. They were shopping and dining. But they were highly-considered shopping and dining that came in the form of an innovative design that served highly both the functional design of outer Future World and the internal spaces themselves. The CommuniCore buildings as we have known them are a gift Stargate and Centorium were partly responsible for giving us - it would not have been designed the same way without them. A gift that's been squandered for nearly 3 decades, and is now being well recieved with the new shopping and dining options that simply make bland use of an already great building.

The good things that have come with Connections and Creations are a credit to the successed of the 1982 design of the structure, not really to any work that was done now aside from choosing to reveal it again. Which was a good choice - better than Mousegear and Electric Umbrella did, but isn't an innovation of its own. Especially when you consider they took a great exterior and gave it such a regular-looking interior. Connections and Creations more leeching off the good bones than they are building on them.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Stargate and Centorium at least had going for them that the entire CommuniCore structure was conceived around the shared presence of those dining and shopping options, along with the CC Exhibits themselves - they weren't slotted into an empty venue, the venue was conceptually founded on housing those specific shopping and dining options. It wasn't "and whatever restaurant and shopping we think of can go here" - the CommuniCore building wasn't an empty husk waiting for tenants. The building was designed to hold Stargate and Centorium, and the architecture and planning reflected the functions of those specific spaces in its design.

MouseGear and Electric Umbrella negated much of the form and function of these spaces the same way Innoventions did - that entire reconception botched the central plaza buildings and their value to the EPCOT guest experience, which was higher pre 1994 than it has been at any time since.

The decline was 28 years ago, so it's understandable that not everyone remembers it. And it is true that Stargate and Centorium weren't, like, E-Ticket options within the park. They were shopping and dining. But they were highly-considered shopping and dining that came in the form of an innovative design that served highly both the functional design of outer Future World and the internal spaces themselves. The CommuniCore buildings as we have known them are a gift Stargate and Centorium were partly responsible for giving us - it would not have been designed the same way without them. A gift that's been squandered for nearly 3 decades, and is now being well recieved with the new shopping and dining options that simply make bland use of an already great building.

The good things that have come with Connections and Creations are a credit to the successed of the 1982 design of the structure, not really to any work that was done now aside from choosing to reveal it again. Which was a good choice - better than Mousegear and Electric Umbrella did, but isn't an innovation of its own. Especially when you consider they took a great exterior and gave it such a regular-looking interior. Connections and Creations more leeching off the good bones than they are building on them.

Again, I agree with almost all of this -- but it feels like you're giving Centorium and Stargate credit that they don't really deserve. Communicore itself was incredibly well designed, but I think that's different from the actual interior design of Centorium and Stargate. They were very much early/mid 1980s design; I don't think anyone thought they were forward looking spaces absent the overall Communicore framing.

But perhaps it's two separate discussions? The overall architecture versus the interior design?
 

Rich Brownn

Well-Known Member
Ehhhhhh... yes and no. The 60s NY World's Fair is the most direct influence, but the technological triumphalism and celebration of a corporate-built future was absolutely fundamental to all American Fairs, and pavilions with exhibits celebrating this were just as central as the international exhibits. After all, the most popular and culturally resonant element of the very first US Fair in Philadelphia in 1876 was the massive Corliss Centennial Engine, which powered the entire expo and in which various great literary, political, and corporate minds saw the dawning of a new age. Really, the technological and international components can't be separated - the ideological foundation of the fair was the interaction of the two.

(And if we're looking for very direct influences, NY 1939, which featured a giant ball as the centerpiece and a popular robot show gives the 60s version a run for its money.)

I do think, however, that one way forward for EPCOT might be to start looking at the Fairs more broadly, bringing in elements from expos other then the 60s NY ones. This could open up a huge range of architectural, design, and thematic possibilities while still remaining true to the founding spirit of EPCOT.
The 64/65 relied more on corporate than any other fair because it wasn't sanctioned and a lot of nations refused to participate. (The 39/40 was also not totally sanctioned either). Compare corporate pavilions between 64/65 fair and the sanctioned Expo70.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom