GimpYancIent
Well-Known Member
Wish her well. Now, who is next? How deep is the bench?
As a C-suite executive, McCarthy is considered a "key employee." Restoration to one's job may be denied to key employees should the company deem that restoration would cause "substantial and grievous economic injury to the company." § 825.218The company is OBLIGATED to give her FMLA. Obviously no C-level wants that as the impact to their career is major and regaining your seat is complex - but the 'you don't get...' line makes no sense to me.
Wish her well. Now, who is next? How deep is the bench?
Maybe you should re-read????????????You’re thanking god that she has medical issues????????
WOAH. Careful there, very hot take around here.I wish her no ill will, and the fact that it’s a medical issue is terrible and hopefully things work out for the best, whatever it may be. That said, I’m glad she’s no longer CFO.
This woman has had no impact in my life whatsoever,
As a cancer survivor, I would not be cheering if Chapek had to step down because of a cancer diagnosis. It's a horrible, horrible disease. I have no opinion on this woman's performance, but I think it's terrible how people are calling her "horrible woman" and they're celebrating that she's stepping down for health reasons, regardless of how you feel about her performance.I just...
If Bob Chapek stepped down from CEO due to a medical leave, I firmly believe tons would be cheering. Not because of his hypothetical health issues, but because he was terrible at the position.
I don't understand how people have conflated someone's health and their job.
I've been going to WDW since 1996 and nothing she has done during her tenure has negatively impacted me. In fact I was just there three weeks ago and had one of the best visits ever. This is just another idiotic smear campaign by some Peter Pan adults who haven't seemed to grasp that a multi-billion dollar company doesn't bow down and cater to them. People like you are so unserious, I can't help but laugh hysterically. Stay pressed and bitter.If you are a Disney stockholder or were a regular customer during her tenure, she has.
but I think it's terrible how people are calling her "horrible woman"
I've been going to WDW since 1996 and nothing she has done during her tenure has negatively impacted me. In fact I was just there three weeks ago and had one of the best visits ever. This is just another idiotic smear campaign by some Peter Pan adults who haven't seemed to grasp that a multi-billion dollar company doesn't bow down and cater to them. People like you are so unserious, I can't help but laugh hysterically. Stay pressed and bitter.
I don't know of anything that CMc was responsible for in order to grade her tenure as good or bad, except for facilitating Chapek's firing, which I would think people here would be applauding.
The purchase of Fox? I applaud that. But I'm not giving Christine credit for it. That was an Iger+Board decision.
What was she responsible for that can be pinned on her alone that would indicate she was bad at her job?
That's the thing. That comment made headlines, and for good reason. But since when are finance people known for their sense of humor?People mostly seem to hate her for a snarky comment she made, that was clearly in poor taste, and likely her attempt to inject humour. Again all done insanely poorly and distastefully.
The purchase of Fox? I applaud that. But I'm not giving Christine credit for it. That was an Iger+Board decision.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.