BlakeW39
Well-Known Member
In order to disagree with a point one first must be made. Blasting threads with tons of "cryptic" posts to try and look like an insider is not a point. Telling every person with a complaint about Disney they're right, no matter how nonsensical or worse, is not an actual point that can be debated because it's not a coherent idea, and a lot of it looking to valid rather awful positions that extend outside of a discussion of Disney.
Uh-huh. Do you know what an ad hominem fallacy is?
Under iger’s direction
You are full aware the parks guys takes all the arrows from the skirmishers…
I think we can see that he wasn’t the BIG problem then.
Everything done in parks…which ain’t looking good right now…fits iger’s mind trap to a T
he did have a 'point' ^^
I’m fully aware that you’re little more than a stochastic parrot that spams threads with incoherent, contradictory nonsense to try and look informed. Claiming Rasulo and Staggs just followed Iger is yet another clear example..
^^ which you then replied to with this ad hominem fallacy, attacking how @Sirwalterraleigh conducts himself across all forum topics (completely irrelevant), instead of addressing the actual content of what he's saying. All the while maintaining a (typical) condescending tone while at the same time completely misusing the word 'stochastic.'
Last edited: