Whatever the reason he probably still bails out in his golden parachute.So did Chapek actually ‘step down’ at his will or was he told to step down or just straight up fired?
They’re all very different
Whatever the reason he probably still bails out in his golden parachute.So did Chapek actually ‘step down’ at his will or was he told to step down or just straight up fired?
They’re all very different
Fired with a hot poker it seems. They didn't even tell him until the Board had secured Iger and the announcement was being made.. according to reports this AM.So did Chapek actually ‘step down’ at his will or was he told to step down or just straight up fired?
They’re all very different
I have to imagine some sort of correction is coming re: streaming especially if a recession hits. We seem to have reached critical mass in the market. The average consumer only has so many entertainment dollars and will grow tired of having to keep tabs on so many services.It was the plan 3-4 years ago when streaming was the unfailing future of media. And that bubble got bigger and bigger and bigger…..
Park reservations, park hopping restrictions, lightning lane access. A significant amount of logistics is being burdened onto guests. I believe that will change.What significant logistical issues will be addressed do you think?
Disney is in a unique situation because of their exposure in having 3 different streaming services. Most of which are bundled and most of which are not organic subscribers. (eg bundled with cellphone or telco or cable provider) I would wager that if most current D+, ESPN+, or Hulu subscribers had to pay directly for their subscriptions the situation would be much worse.I have to imagine some sort of correction is coming re: streaming especially if a recession hits. We seem to have reached critical mass in the market. The average consumer only has so many entertainment dollars and will grow tired of having to keep tabs on so many services.
So is the answer merge one or more of the above to eliminate redundancies and broaden appeal or keep them as separate yet in bundles so as to not deviate from their respective core reasons for being?Disney is in a unique situation because of their exposure in having 3 different streaming services. Most of which are bundled and most of which are not organic subscribers. (eg bundled with cellphone or telco or cable provider) I would wager that if most current D+, ESPN+, or Hulu subscribers had to pay directly for their subscriptions the situation would be much worse.
So merging is dangerous because they count subscribers of bundles across all the services. Imagine the collective horror of consolidating and finding your subscriber growth was flat.So is the answer merge one or more of the above to eliminate redundancies and broaden appeal or keep them as separate yet in bundles so as to not deviate from their respective core reasons for being?
I understand the optics but subscriber count being used as a measure of success is a silly premise when one thinks about it.So merging is dangerous because they count subscribers of bundles across all the services. Imagine the collective horror of consolidating and finding your subscriber growth was flat.
i would wager that 90% of US D+, Hulu, or ESPN+ subs are paying out of pocket already.Disney is in a unique situation because of their exposure in having 3 different streaming services. Most of which are bundled and most of which are not organic subscribers. (eg bundled with cellphone or telco or cable provider) I would wager that if most current D+, ESPN+, or Hulu subscribers had to pay directly for their subscriptions the situation would be much worse.
I hope so.Disney is in a unique situation because of their exposure in having 3 different streaming services. Most of which are bundled and most of which are not organic subscribers. (eg bundled with cellphone or telco or cable provider) I would wager that if most current D+, ESPN+, or Hulu subscribers had to pay directly for their subscriptions the situation would be much worse.
LOL it should be....Will this be the plot of season 5 of Succession?
I bet that Verizon deal is a lot of subs…i would wager that 90% of US D+, Hulu, or ESPN+ subs are paying out of pocket already.
Hearing many people say that Chapek was the fall out guy. Not sure what to think, Chapek did everything he could to save money for the company but a lot was tarnished due to it. Now Iger coming back and looking like the "good guy" is just laughable. Some of the decisions Iger made before his exit make me wonder if the company will really be in better hands or not. I always wonder who will be the true successor to Iger, in a way it's sort of unbelievable that Chapek was the one that succeeded Iger.
Will Disney IT really be willing to roll back a lot of these park systems? I mean, there's some huge legitimate questions to be answered. We all want the parks to be back to the normal way, but I seriously wonder if Disney will invest to "fix" what happened.
Chapek's walking away with tens of millions and the hatred of internet Disney fans he couldn't care less about. I'd get in line for that trade any day of the week.Will this be the plot of season 5 of Succession?
Not as much as you thinkWatching CNBC…Disney stock up 8% in pre market trading…Gee, you think the market is happy?
I can understand not being excited about a guy who is primarily responsible for the guy who just got canned.Not as much as you think
The street Is still not loving this like I woulda thunk
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.