All of that is true about the other parks, yes. They've lost a lot of their unique things, and it's a shame. But what has MK lost during Iger's tenure that was totally unique to MK? And by totally unique, I don't mean something that once existed at multiple parks but MK's ended up being the last one standing. I mean something completely, totally unique to MK that originated there and didn't go somewhere else. Maybe there are things and I just can't remember.
Alien Encounter/Stitch's Great Escape and Great Muppet moments in history just to name the more obvious ones. Iger's fault of MK not being different and sloppier than DL does not come from what has been built as much as what has been neglected and or closed. Neither additions to the park have infrastructure built for those utilized.
But even still, the point I'm making is MK isn't very unique and hasn't been for a long time. Despite being the busiest, it is the castle park with by far the least in the way of it's own personal identity. By being a sloppier version of Disneyland, and then having Tokyo show how MK could've been better with the same core concept, I feel it's always been hurt by not having enough to differentiate itself.
I get what you are saying now, but much of Tokyo being superior to MK came from neglect of efforts in the last 20-25 years with a few sprinkled changes before that. I did not always find Tokyo Disneyland to have the best of the Kingdoms. The criteria you reference is difficult, because some things were actually at MK first that became so popular others had gotten them a decade later. This is again is more neglect than not. MK upon opening had differences with increasing separation goals, some the public did not want early on like Pirates, and others that became stagnant. For example, as a miniland Mickey's Birthday land was original at its opening in 1988, so popular that Toontown borrowed most elements of it after they wanted something with Roger Rabbit for Disneyland. Space Mountain and Country Bears were original to MK but so good DL got them too. And although it no longer stands and was a clone in elements and name. Mr. Toad was certainly better at WDW than DL. But that is gone now too. It is not always that DL has a better version stance.
And Magic Kingdom was difficult to fault for having many of the similarities at first, as that is what people wanted. It was a goal, and Walt still made sure to plan differences and improvements in some cases (immersion, castle size/scale, Hall of Presidents compared to Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln) while having unique land elements at opening to differentiate it(Liberty Square) to wanting to have a different ride than Pirates, but they gave the public what they wanted. All in the recent years after Walt's death. When MK opened to many decades, it was not seen as the sloppier DL. That is a much more recent feeling from fans that know better. Location aside, people wanted the scale and other improvements that MK had.
I totally get what you are saying when one hopes to have something unique in a line up, but we know that is not the reason this attraction themed to cars is wanted or being built, and nor will it remain that way if it is a success.
Last edited: