Haymarket2008
Well-Known Member
This could be just copium talking, but…..the northern path adjacent to Thunder Mountain buts up against trees and….water?
Last edited:
There will still be water and beautiful sightlinesRemoving the water and beautiful sightlines. Putting Cars IP zooming by the Haunted Mansion. Having a snowy mountain randomly across from the facades of Frontierland...
Disney is a failed company. How did something this stupid ever get approved!
False. The concept are shows them totally filling in the water and having the cars ride right outside the queue for Haunted Mansion.There will still be water and beautiful sightlines
Cars will not be zooming by the Haunted Mansion
How did something this stupid ever get approved!
The five stages of grief in action.I keep seeing some comments about how there may be a change of mind, and it wont go forward on TSI and RoA. Just to reiterate, this project is full steam ahead, and nobody is reconsidering.
Would work perfect. I like how you could create a small Bayou area on the mountain side of cars as wel
right? Maybe that water connects to the Bayou below tiana’sThis could be just copium talking, but…..the norther path adjacent to Thunder Mountain buts up against trees and….water?
View attachment 809271
If they do not stop after the horrible feedback, fire lots of people involved with the terrible decision, and move the Cars ride to behind Thunder where there is a TON of space - then Disney deserves to have empty parks.I keep seeing some comments about how there may be a change of mind, and it wont go forward on TSI and RoA. Just to reiterate, this project is full steam ahead, and nobody is reconsidering.
No. It actually doesn’t show that. It shows the river removed. But it still shows water and waterfalls and there will be more that you can’t see from this art.False. The concept are shows them totally filling in the water and having the cars ride right outside the queue for Haunted Mansion.
I think outside of the serious fans, the majority of casual park guests think Cars moving into RoA and TSI is a very good thing.If they do not stop after the horrible feedback, fire lots of people involved with the terrible decision, and move the Cars ride to behind Thunder where there is a TON of space - then Disney deserves to have empty parks.
Outside of the echo chamber most of us live in, the feedback for this is not horrible. In fact it’s quite positive.If they do not stop after the horrible feedback, fire lots of people involved with the terrible decision, and move the Cars ride to behind Thunder where there is a TON of space - then Disney deserves to have empty parks.
Correct. It seems they are wanting it to be more Mineral King Ski Resort a la Country Bears lore. Which is.....fine, but there is no connective tissue anywhere else.
They KNOW it has to blow people out of the water! Just like they knew Tiana’s had to blow people out of the water! Look at how great that turned out! Why can’t we trust these poor execs making these hard decisions!
They think we’re idiots.
I keep seeing comments about how MK has the worst FL, but I honestly don't get it. What makes other FLs more special than MK's? I've been to DL and their FL seemed small and didn't have much more (if anything more) to offer than MK's. Of course, now it will with their shooting arcade, riverboat and island still intact (for now). But I felt underwhelmed with their FL compared to WDW's. Ours always felt so open to me and very "western expansion" like.Magic Kingdom version kinda does. Probably the worst one in the world. It’s such a nothing burger in comparison to the other ones. That’s why I think those of is who’re excited for it getting changed are excited even if we disagree with the chosen IP. It’s kind of unfortunate that the busiest park in the world has got the worst version of a cool land, and that’s gotta change.
I think this is the part where I’m willing to wait and see. Along the existing path, I can see what they’re going for with the transition from the northeast to Appalachia to the Opry to the bayou to Yellowstone to the southwest. I think this can look good from existing Frontierland. Very different, but still good. I’ll have to see how effectively they hide all things Cars. But therein lies the issue, which is that they have to hide parts of it, regardless of how pretty the walls surrounding it end up being. It’s cordoned off because they acknowledge that there will be cognitive dissonance otherwise.3) The current plan is a STAGGERING aesthetic downgrade - literally paving paradise and putting in a parking lot. It also ruins the entire plan of a third of the park to which the water is integral. It doesn’t even rise to the level of a first draft - it would barely be acceptable as a brainstorming product. It’s unfathomably lazy and a huge indictment of the Imagineers.
I think outside of the serious fans, the majority of casual park guests think Cars moving into RoA and TSI is a very good thing.
I think it's super simple for the general public. "I don't go on TSI, but I would love two Cars rides. I'm in!"It would depend on how it's framed IMO. Casual fans are probably not thinking of the implication of what it means or what the land might feel like without the ROA/TSI.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.